Fragmentation of Authority in Muslim Liquid Society: A Crisis of Legitimacy, Epistemic Pluralism and Religious Negotiation in the Digital Age

Nazar Naamy, Ishak Hariyanto

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of religious authority fragmentation within the context of Muslim liquid society, a social condition in which the boundaries of tradition, institutions, and scholarly hierarchies dissolve under the waves of modernity, globalisation, and the digital revolution. Employing a sociology of religion framework and critical discourse analysis, this study traces how traditional ulama authority undergoes systemic delegitimisation. At the same time, new religious actors such as social media preachers, Muslim influencers, and online communities fill the emerging power vacuum. The researchers gathered data through an in-depth literature study of contemporary Islamic sociology, digital media studies, and cross-national religious phenomena. The findings indicate that authority fragmentation not only produces a legitimacy crisis but also gives rise to a complex epistemic pluralism in which actors with diverse social capital contest, negotiate, and continuously construct religious truth. This study argues that Muslim liquid society is not an outright threat to Islam, but rather a dynamic arena of theological and social negotiation that nonetheless requires institutional recalibration to prevent moral relativism and community polarisation.



Keywords


Authority Fragmentation; Muslim Liquid Society; Digital Media

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Eickelman, D. F., & Anderson, J. W. (2003). New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.

3. Roy, O. (2004). Globalised Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. Columbia University Press.

4. Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. University of North Carolina Press.

5. Mandaville, P. (2007). Global political Islam. Routledge.

6. Zed, M. (2014). Library research methods. Jakarta: Indonesia Torch Foundation.

7. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed). Routledge.

8. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

9. Beck, U. (2010). A God of One's Own. Polity Press.

10. Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Polity Press.

11. Bellah, R. N. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. University of California Press.

12. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 1–44.

13. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.

14. Zaman, M. Q. (2010). The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton University Press.

15. Messick, B. (1993). The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. University of California Press.

16. Hallaq, W. B. (2001). Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press.

17. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.

18. Wearesocial. (2023). Digital 2023: Indonesia. The Essential Guide to the Latest Connected Behaviours. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Digital-2023-Indonesia.pdf

19. Hew, W. W. (2018). The Art of Dakwah: Social Media, Visual Persuasion and the Islamist Propagation of Felix Siauw. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 61–79. doi: 10.1080/13639811.2018.1416757

20. UIN News Online. (2020). PPIM survey: nationalism dimension in religious education curriculum requires the DPR's attention. Retrieved from https://uinjkt.ac.id/en/ppim-survey-dimension-of-nationalism-in-religious-education-curriculum-requires-the-dpr-attention#

21. Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers' fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. doi: 10.1177/1329878x16665177

22. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.

23. Bowen, J. R. (2016). On British Islam: Religion, Law, and Everyday Practice in Shari'a Councils. Princeton University Press.

24. Anderson, J. W., & Eickelman, D. F. (2003). Redefining Muslim publics. In D. F. Eickelman & J. W. Anderson, New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere (pp. 1–18). Indiana University Press.

25. Burhanuddin, J., & Baedowi, A. (2003). Transformasi otoritas keagamaan: pengalaman Islam Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

26. Hamayotsu, K. (2012). Once a Muslim, always a Muslim: The Politics of State Enforcement of Syariah in Contemporary Malaysia. South East Asia Research, 20(3), 399–421. doi: 10.5367/sear.2012.01

27. Wahid Foundation. (2020). The potential for radicalism and terrorism in Indonesia: A 2020 national survey.

28. Pew Research Centre. (2022). Dataset: Global Restrictions on Religion 2007-2022. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/dataset/dataset-global-restrictions-on-religion-2007-2022/

29. Ramadan, T. (2009). Radical Reform: Islamic Ethics and Liberation. Oxford University Press.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Nazar Naamy, Ishak Hariyanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.