Morphological and Variational Analysis of Upper Limb Superficial Vein Patterns in Human Identification and Forensic Anatomy

Olasoji O. Agboola, Thomas K. Adenowo

Abstract

Traditional forensic identification does not work well when tissues are damaged, bodies are incomplete, or when people try to hide who they are. Studies of blood vessel patterns are less accurate outside the lab. We tested whether visible arm vein patterns can reliably identify people for forensic use. We studied 384 people (192 men, 192 women, aged 18-72) from three Nigerian states from January 2023 to March 2024. The ethnic groups were Igbo (38.2%), Yoruba (31.5%), and Hausa (22.1%). We used special cameras, clear photos, and an ultrasound to record the vein patterns of both arms under the same conditions. We analysed the shapes and patterns using sorting and computer tools. We reached 96.8% accuracy with seven main features, and computer learning methods reached 98.5%. Four main pattern types had different results: complex (98.3%), network (97.2%), hybrid (96.8%), and linear (96.1%). The features stayed the same over 12 months, with similarity scores consistently above 0.94. Age, gender, and ethnicity helped improve identification. In summary, upper-arm vein patterns are strong forensic identifiers, making them valuable for modern forensic analysis.



Keywords


vascular biometrics; forensic identification; morphometric analysis; pattern recognition; temporal stability; biometric validation

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. FBI. (n. d.). Next Generation Identification (NGI). Retrieved from https://le.fbi.gov/science-and-lab/biometrics-and-fingerprints/biometrics/next-generation-identification-ngi

2. Hemis, M., Kheddar, H., Bourouis, S., & Saleem, N. (2024). Deep learning techniques for hand vein biometrics: A comprehensive review. Information Fusion, 114, 102716. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102716

3. Shaheed, K., Mao, A., Qureshi, I., Kumar, M., Hussain, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Recent advancements in finger vein recognition technology: Methodology, challenges and opportunities. Information Fusion, 79, 84–109. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.10.004

4. López-González, P., Baturone, I., Hinojosa, M., & Arjona, R. (2022). Evaluation of a vein biometric recognition system on an ordinary smartphone. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3522. doi: 10.3390/app12073522

5. Garcia-Martin, R., & Sanchez-Reillo, R. (2020). Wrist vascular biometric recognition using a portable contactless system. Sensors, 20(5), 1469. doi: 10.3390/s20051469

6. Gonzalez-Soler, L. J., Zyla, K. M., Rathgeb, C., & Fischer, D. (2024). Contactless hand biometrics for forensics: review and performance benchmark. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2024(1). doi: 10.1186/s13640-024-00642-3

7. Jain, A. K., & Ross, A. (2015). Bridging the gap: from biometrics to forensics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 370(1674), 20140254. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0254

8. Fiolka, J., Bernacki, K., Farah, A., & Popowicz, A. (2023). Multi-Wavelength biometric acquisition system utilising NIR imaging of finger vasculature. Sensors, 23(4), 1981. doi: 10.3390/s23041981

9. Chen, A. I., Balter, M. L., Maguire, T. J., & Yarmush, M. L. (2016). 3D near infrared and ultrasound imaging of peripheral blood vessels for Real-Time localisation and needle guidance. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9902, 388–396. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_45

10. Bacchetti, P., McCulloch, C. E., & Segal, M. R. (2008). Simple, defensible sample sizes based on cost efficiency. Biometrics, 64(2), 577–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01004_1.x

11. Dass, S., Zhu, N. Y., & Jain, A. (2006). Validating a biometric authentication system: sample size requirements. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(12), 1902–1913. doi: 10.1109/tpami.2006.255

12. Mao, L., Kim, K., & Miao, X. (2021). Sample size formula for general win ratio analysis. Biometrics, 78(3), 1257–1268. doi: 10.1111/biom.13501

13. Wang, L., & Leedham, G. (2006). Near- and Far- Infrared Imaging for Vein Pattern Biometrics. IEEE International Conference on Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 52. doi: 10.1109/avss.2006.80

14. Bookstein, F. L. (1997). Shape and the Information in Medical Images: A Decade of the Morphometric Synthesis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 66(2), 97–118. doi: 10.1006/cviu.1997.0607

15. Zhou, S. K., Greenspan, H., Davatzikos, C., Duncan, J. S., Van Ginneken, B., Madabhushi, A., Prince, J. L., Rueckert, D., Summers, R. M., Zhou, S. K., Greenspan, H., Davatzikos, C., Duncan, J. S., Van Ginneken, B., Madabhushi, A., Prince, J. L., Rueckert, D., & Summers, R. M. (2021). A review of deep learning in medical imaging: imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promises. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 820–838. doi: 10.1109/jproc.2021.3054390

16. Hallgrimsson, B., Percival, C. J., Green, R., Young, N. M., Mio, W., & Marcucio, R. (2015). Morphometrics, 3D imaging, and craniofacial development. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 115, 561–597. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.09.003


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Olasoji O. Agboola, Thomas K. Adenowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.