Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal

Strategic communication plays a central role in public health crisis management, especially during high-impact emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents a comparative case analysis of strategic communication practices across two public health institutions: the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) and the U.S.-based HEAL (Health Equity Action Lab), a data-focused public health initiative committed to advancing health equity and strengthening crisis response among underserved communities. Using a qualitative content analysis of secondary data, including institutional reports, press briefings, global frameworks (WHO, CDC), and scholarly evaluations, the study explores how communication clarity, transparency, timeliness, leadership visibility, and stakeholder engagement influenced public trust and crisis responsiveness. The analysis identifies key divergences and similarities in the communication strategies employed by each institution. HEAL demonstrated high leadership visibility and message clarity but lacked robust feedback mechanisms and transparency. NCDC showed improvement over time but was often constrained by reactive messaging and limited stakeholder inclusion. A thematic integration reveals that institutions with consistent messaging and participatory planning were better able to maintain public confidence and internal alignment. The study concludes by highlighting the consequences of weak strategic communication, such as public scepticism, misinformation spread, and non-compliance. It proposes a cross-context framework for strengthening crisis communication in future emergencies. These findings offer actionable insights for public health leaders and policymakers in both developed and developing settings.

Strategic communication; crisis management; public health institutions; healthcare leadership; communication effectiveness; COVID-19; mixed methods; transparency; stakeholder engagement; institutional trust

1. Malecki, K. M. C., Keating, J. A., & Safdar, N. (2020). Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 697–702. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa758

2. World Health Organization. (2017). Communicating risk in public health emergencies: a WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (‎ERC)‎ policy and practice. Retrieved from https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/259807

3. CERC. (2018). Crisis + Emergency Risk Communication. Introduction. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cerc/media/pdfs/CERC_Introduction.pdf

4. Reynolds, B., & W. Seeger, M. (2005). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1080/10810730590904571

5. World Health Organization. (2020, March 16). Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Action Plan Guidance COVID-19 Preparedness and Response. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-communication-and-community-engagement-(rcce)-action-plan-guidance

6. Coombs, W. T. (2012). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (3d ed.). SAGE Publications.

7. Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2020). Theorising crisis communication (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

8. James, E. H., & Wooten, L. P. (2010). Leading under pressure: From surviving to thriving before, during, and after a crisis. Routledge.

9. Kim, J., Lee, H. W., & Chung, G. H. (2023). Organisational resilience: leadership, operational and individual responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 37(1), 92–115. doi: 10.1108/jocm-05-2023-0160

10. Gollust, S. E., Nagler, R. H., & Fowler, E. F. (2020). The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 967–981. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641506

11. Wood, R. M., Juanchich, M., Ramirez, M., & Zhang, S. (2023). Promoting COVID-19 vaccine confidence through public responses to misinformation: The joint influence of message source and message content. Social Science & Medicine, 324, 115863. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115863

12. Rubinelli, S., Häfliger, C., Fiordelli, M., Ort, A., & Diviani, N. (2023). Institutional crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. A qualitative study of the experiences of representatives of public health organisations. Patient Education and Counseling, 114, 107813. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107813

13. Hong, S., Kim, B., & Lee, S. Y. (2023). A public health crisis in the university: Impact of crisis response strategies on universities' transparency and post-crisis relationships during COVID 19 pandemic. Public Relations Review, 49(1), 102287. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102287

14. Adepoju, P. (2020). Nigeria responds to COVID-19; first case detected in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 444–448. doi: 10.1038/d41591-020-00004-2

15. Lassa, S., Saddiq, M., Owen, J., Burton, C., & Balen, J. (2022). Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6097

16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

17. Shen, W., Hentschel, T., & Hideg, I. (2023). Leading through the uncertainty of COVID‐19: The joint influence of leader emotions and gender on abusive and family‐supportive supervisory behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(1). doi: 10.1111/joop.12439