Assessing the Impact of Lean Six Sigma Management on Organisational Productivity

Humphery Efe Golor, Samuel Nilayefah Fawedikimo, Ademola Hope Adeoye, Emmanuel Ifeanyi Duhu, Oluwakemi Fehintola Dosunmu, Hannah Motunrayo Shobajo

Abstract

We conducted a comprehensive study to investigate the impact of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) management practices on organisational productivity across various industries. We employed a quantitative research approach, using structured questionnaires, to survey 44 professionals from diverse sectors, including manufacturing, IT/technology, healthcare, engineering, and finance. The survey assessed their perceptions of LSS implementation outcomes over a seven-day data collection period from June 6 to 13, 2025. Our results demonstrate that LSS significantly enhances organisational performance, with 88.7% of participants agreeing that LSS reduces organisational waste, 86.3% acknowledging its role in improving customer satisfaction, 81.8% recognising its contribution to organisational culture change, and 77.3% confirming its effectiveness in achieving competitive advantage. We also identified critical success factors, with Leadership and Facilitation rated as most essential (61.4%), followed by Process Improvement (59.1%) and Data Analytics (56.8%), while the primary implementation challenge was sustaining improvements over time (61.4% agreement). The study concludes that LSS provides substantial empirical evidence for enhancing organisational productivity through comprehensive waste reduction, improved customer satisfaction, cultural transformation, and strategic positioning across multiple industry sectors, emphasising the critical importance of leadership commitment, analytical capabilities, and sustained organisational support for successful implementation. 



Keywords


Lean Six Sigma; Organisational Productivity; Process Improvement; Quality Management; Operational Excellence

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. McDermott, O., Antony, J., Bhat, S., Jayaraman, R., Rosa, A., Marolla, G., & Parida, R. (2022). Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review on Motivations and Benefits. Processes, 10(10), 1910. doi: 10.3390/pr10101910

2. Laureani, A., & Antony, J. (2012). Critical success factors for the effective implementation of Lean Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(4), 274–283. doi: 10.1108/20401461211284743

3. Antony, J., McDermott, O., Powell, D., & Sony, M. (2022). The evolution and future of Lean Six Sigma 4.0. The TQM Journal, 35(4), 1030–1047. doi: 10.1108/tqm-04-2022-0135

4. Gijo, E., & Sarkar, A. (2013). Application of Six Sigma to improve the quality of the road for wind turbine installation. The TQM Journal, 25(3), 244–258. doi: 10.1108/17542731311307438

5. Zhang, M., Wang, W., Goh, T. N., & He, Z. (2014). Comprehensive Six Sigma application: a case study. Production Planning & Control, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2014.891058

6. Bhat, S., Gijo, E., & Jnanesh, N. A. (2015). Productivity and performance improvement in the medical records department of a hospital: An application of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(1), 98–125. doi: 10.1108/ijppm-04-2014-0063

7. Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2019). Big data in lean six Sigma: A review and further research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(3), 947–969. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1598599

8. Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Lean and green – a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064

9. Sahoo, S., & Yadav, S. (2018). Lean implementation in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Benchmarking an International Journal, 25(4), 1121–1147. doi: 10.1108/bij-02-2017-0033

10. Thomas, A., Barton, R., & Chuke‐Okafor, C. (2008). Applying Lean Six Sigma in a small engineering company – a change model. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(1), 113–129. doi: 10.1108/17410380910925433

11. Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1969). Organisation and Management: A Systems Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12. Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kumar, N., & Haleem, A. (2016). Barriers in the Green Lean Six Sigma Product Development Process: An ISM Approach. Production Planning & Control, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1165307

13. Albliwi, S., Antony, J., Lim, S. A. H., & Van Der Wiele, T. (2014). Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(9), 1012–1030. doi: 10.1108/ijqrm-09-2013-0147

14. De Mast, J., & Lokkerbol, J. (2012). An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), 604–614. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.035

15. Bhat, S., & Jnanesh, N. (2014b). Application of Lean Six Sigma methodology to reduce the cycle time of outpatient department service in a rural hospital. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 14(3), 222. doi: 10.1504/ijhtm.2014.064257

16. Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020). Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model. Technology in Society, 61, 101248. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101248

17. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2010). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster.

18. Prashar, A. (2022). Quality management in industry 4.0 environment: a morphological analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(3), 863–885. oi: 10.1108/ijqrm-10-2021-0348

19. Woodall, W. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (1999). Research issues and ideas in statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology, 31(4), 376–386. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1999.11979944

20. Folaron, J., & Morgan, J. P. (2003). The evolution of Six Sigma. Lean & Six Sigma Review, 2(4).

21. Reese, S. (2020). Taking the learning organisation mainstream and beyond the organisational level. The Learning Organisation, 27(1), 6–16. doi: 10.1108/tlo-09-2019-0136

22. Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073–1093. doi: 10.1108/ijqrm-03-2016-0035

23. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

24. Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

25. Thornhill, A., Lewis, P., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2019). Research Methods For Business Students. ‎Pearson.

26. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

27. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

28. Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Global Edition (7th ed.). Pearson.

29. Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2018). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

30. Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

31. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual. In Routledge eBooks. doi: 10.4324/9781003117452

32. Prashar, A. (2020). Quality management for high-contact professional service firms: a multiple-case evidence from Indian law firms. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(2), 413–436. doi: 10.1108/ijqrm-02-2019-0064

33. Kumar, M., Antony, J., Madu, C. N., Montgomery, D. C., & Park, S. H. (2008). Common myths of Six Sigma demystified. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(8), 878–895. doi: 10.1108/02656710810898658


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Humphery Efe Golor, Samuel Nilayefah Fawedikimo, Ademola Hope Adeoye, Emmanuel Ifeanyi Duhu, Oluwakemi Fehintola Dosunmu, Hannah Motunrayo Shobajo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.