Virtual Reality in Anatomical Sciences Teaching and Research

Olasoji O. Agboola

Abstract

This research investigates the implementation and effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) technology in anatomical sciences teaching across three medical education institutions. The study employed a mixed-methods approach to examine VR's influence on learning outcomes, teaching methodologies, and resource utilisation in anatomical education. Data analysis from 245 participants, including 217 medical students and 28 faculty members, revealed significant improvements in student performance. The quantitative assessment demonstrated an 18.5% increase in spatial comprehension and a 14.3% enhancement in long-term knowledge retention compared to traditional teaching methods. Technical implementation analysis showed 92.8% average system uptime through dedicated support systems and robust infrastructure. Student comfort levels with VR technology improved from 3.2 to 4.5 on a five-point scale, while faculty technical confidence showed similar improvement patterns. Hybrid learning environments demonstrated 92% teaching time efficiency compared to traditional settings. The findings support VR technology's effectiveness in enhancing anatomical education while emphasising the importance of integrated teaching approaches. Critical success factors included comprehensive technical support, ongoing professional development, and balanced implementation strategies. These results provide valuable guidance for institutions implementing VR technology in medical education, contributing to theoretical understanding and practical application of educational technology in anatomical training.



Keywords


Virtual Reality; Anatomical Education; Medical Training; Educational Technology; Mixed-Methods Research; Learning Outcomes; Technology Implementation; Spatial Comprehension; Faculty Development; Hybrid Learning

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Al-Hiyari, N., & Jusoh, S. (2020). The current trends of virtual reality applications in medical education. 2022 14th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ecai50035.2020.9223158

2. García‐Robles, P., Cortés‐Pérez, I., Nieto‐Escámez, F. A., García‐López, H., Obrero‐Gaitán, E., & Osuna‐Pérez, M. C. (2024). Immersive virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(3), 514–528. doi: 10.1002/ase.2397

3. Naidoo, N., Akhras, A., & Banerjee, Y. (2020). Confronting the challenges of Anatomy Education in a Competency-Based Medical Curriculum during Normal and Unprecedented Times (COVID-19 Pandemic): Pedagogical Framework development and implementation. JMIR Medical Education, 6(2), e21701. doi: 10.2196/21701

4. Aasekjær, K., Gjesdal, B., Rosenberg, I., & Bovim, L. P. (2022). Virtual Reality (VR) in anatomy teaching and learning in higher healthcare education. In Springer eBooks (pp. 117–129). doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-10399-5_10

5. Aasekjær, K., Bjørnås, B., Skivenes, H. K., & Vik, E. S. (2024). Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) when learning anatomy in midwifery education: a pre-post pilot study. European Journal of Midwifery, 8, 1–7. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191364

6. Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Implementing Immersive Virtual Reality in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study of Instructor Attitudes and Perspectives. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 4(2)

7. Mergen, M., Graf, N., & Meyerheim, M. (2024). Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05777-5

8. Rosmansyah, Y., Putri, A., Koesoema, A. P., Latief, A., & Amalia, Y. S. (2021). A systematic review of virtual reality application in anatomy studies. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2344, 050002. doi: 10.1063/5.0047867

9. Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: Review the last decade's learning theories, approaches and methodologies. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. doi: 10.3390/electronics12132832

10. Ustun, A. B., Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2020). Virtual reality in medical education. In Advances in Medical Technologies and Clinical Practice book series (pp. 56–73). doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2521-0.ch004

11. Malungana, L., & Chimbo, B. (2024). The adoption of virtual reality technologies for training healthcare professionals. Africa's Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 12(1). doi: 10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.867

12. Mantovani, F., Castelnuovo, G., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2003). Virtual Reality Training for Healthcare Professionals. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(4), 389–395. doi: 10.1089/109493103322278772

13. Wardana, N. I. N. G. (2021). Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Human Anatomy Courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 209–219. doi: 10.36418/japendi.v2i2.102


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Olasoji O. Agboola

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.