Comparison of the Republic of Indonesia ITE Law No 19 Of 2016 with PDP Law No 27 of 2022 and the Role of the Police in Handling Cases Of Personal Data Dissemination (Doxing)

M. Riansyah Aksar Tarigan, Patricia Riniwigati

Abstract

As technology and information develop, regulations and laws are forced to govern the relationship between individuals and individuals in cyberspace. The emergence of Indonesian Republic Law No 19 of 2016 and the Personal Data Protection Law in Article No 27 of 2022 illustrates that the Indonesian government is also involved in maintaining order in Indonesian society on social media. However, what are the differences and similarities between the two laws in tackling the crime of doxing? Then, what is the role of the police in handling the criminal act of doxing in Indonesia? Law No 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and Law No 27 of 2022 regarding Personal Data Protection have a similar function in preventing the criminal act of spreading personal data (doxing). In the personal data protection law, suppose the ITE law discusses Electronic Documents and Electronic Information such as images, videos, and sound documents. In that case, the regulation discusses formal data such as genetic data, address, family, etc. The two laws complement each other, and both function as an effort to protect the public from the criminal act of spreading personal data (doxing). In the context of law enforcement officials, the police are currently very good at handling cybercrime because they are assisted by the presence of 11 sophisticated data forensic laboratories and other supporting tools, in harmony with the presence of qualified human resources to deal with cybercrime cases.



Keywords


Cybercrime; Doxing; IT Law; Police Role

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Dian, U., Bagos, B., Fajar, F., & Noerma, K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Era Digital Di Indonesia [Legal Protection of Intellectual Property in the Digital Age in Indonesia]. TERANG, 1(1).

2. Putra, Pratama, A., & Pradnya, Y. D. G. (2022). Analyzing Trials Through Online Media During The Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 8–15. doi: 10.55047/polri.v1i1.22

3. Halif, H., Azizah, A., & Ratrini, P. D. (2023). Regulating Doxing and Personal Data Dissemination in Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum, 3(1), 61. doi: 10.19184/jkph.v3i1.33938

4. BBC News Indonesia. (2023, September 22). Pinjol AdaKami diduga teror nasabah karena terlambat bayar cicilan - “Saya dibilang anak haram, orangtua dimaki dengan kasar” [Pinjol AdaKami allegedly terrorises customers for late repayments - ‘I was called an illegitimate child, my parents were abused’]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cz986dygeeyo (in Indonesian).

5. Prihatini, Z., & Maullana, I. (2022, November 11). Sidang Kasus Pria Ancam Korban Pinjol Digelar di PN Jakarta Utara [Trial of man who threatened loan shark victim held at North Jakarta District Court]. Retrieved from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/11/18/14223061/sidang-kasus-pria-ancam-korban-pinjol-digelar-di-pn-jakarta-utara#google_vignette (in Indonesian).

6. Raharjo, A. (2022, June 15). Lima Karyawan Pinjol Ditangkap Atas Dugaan Penyebaran Data [Five loan shark employees arrested on suspicion of spreading data]. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2941341/lima-karyawan-pinjol-ditangkap-polisi-atas-dugaan-penyebaran-data (in Indonesian).

7. Jayanti, D. (2022, December 13). Jerat Hukum Mencatut Nama Orang Lain dalam Dokumen [The Legal Snares of Using Other People's Names in Documents]. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/jerat-hukum-mencatut-nama-orang-lain-dalam-dokumen-lt569eee7a6efaa/ (in Indonesian).

8. Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2023). Behavioral analysis of cybercrime: Paving the way for effective policing strategies. Journal of Economic Criminology, 2, 100034. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100034


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 M. Riansyah Aksar Tarigan, Patricia Riniwigati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.