The Contribution and Role Played by Individual Persons in Criminal Victimisation

Joseph Mwai, Cyprian Kavivya, Stephen Handa

Abstract

Committing a crime is the outcome of a process where many factors are at work. In most cases, crime is not an action but a reaction, or an overreaction, to external and environmental stimuli. This investigation aims to find out why individuals contribute to their criminal victimisation and sometimes even play some role in accelerating or provoking the offender to commit the wrong. Suppose individuals ensure that adequate steps are taken to deter, delay and provide warnings to assist in summoning assistance to prevent crime or reduce the impact of wrongdoing. In that case, criminal victimisation may drop considerably. Situational crime prevention theory proposes that if society takes some measures to reduce the chances of committing a crime, the potential offenders will not succeed in their endeavour to offend. This article argues that the commission of crimes is primarily a function of opportunities to break the laws, which, admissibly, is influenced by the behaviour of potential victims occasionally. Researchers now just do not see a victim as an innocent point of impact on crime but know the victim, at times, playing quite an active role as a contributor to his victimisation. This study adopted a cross-sectional survey design. This approach lets the scholar get data from various sets of populations simultaneously. In this study, the emphasis is on reducing victimisation through enhancing individual personal security. Towards this end, the researcher sought to examine the role played by particular persons in victimisation. The study examined these relationships using samples of common area residents (n = 210), key informants (n = 45) and 145 members of focused group discussions. The findings of this research are expected to provide data that helps inform policymakers and the individuals who are the primary victims of criminal victimisation of the need for enhanced personal security to assist in crime risk management. The study was conducted in Kajiado County, which sits on the southern side of Nairobi City, the capital of Kenya.



Keywords


personal security; criminal victimisation; environmental stimuli; crime prevention

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Berg, M. T., & Schreck, C. J. (2022). The Meaning of the Victim–Offender Overlap for Criminological Theory and Crime Prevention Policy. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 277–297. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-120724

2. Boccio, C. M., Beaver, K. M., & Schwartz, J. A. (2018). The role of verbal intelligence in becoming a successful criminal: Results from a longitudinal sample. Intelligence, 66, 24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.003

3. Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused Deterrence Strategies and Crime Control. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12353

4. Byrne, J., & Marx, G. (2019). Technological Innovations in Crime Prevention and Policing. A Review of the Research on Implementation and Impact. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/technological-innovations-crime-prevention-and-policing-review

5. Carter, E. (2020). Distort, Extort, Deceive and Exploit: Exploring the Inner Workings of a Romance Fraud. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(2), 283–302. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azaa072

6. Shariati, A., & Guerette, R. T. (2016). Situational Crime Prevention. Preventing Crime and Violence, 261–268. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_22

7. Cook, E. A., & Walklate, S. (Eds.). (2019). Excavating Victim Stories: Making Sense of Agency, Suffering and Redemption. The Emerald Handbook of Narrative Criminology, 239–257. doi: 10.1108/978-1-78769-005-920191023

8. De Biasi, A., McGarrell, E., Krupa, J., & Circo, G. (2019). Detroit project safe neighborhoods: Final evaluation report. Retrieved from https://cj.msu.edu/_assets/pdfs/mjsc/psn-det-edmi-final-report-june-2022.pdf

9. Ejrnæs, A., & Scherg, R. H. (2020). The impact of victimisation on feelings of unsafety in different welfare regimes. European Journal of Criminology, 19(6), 1304–1326. doi: 10.1177/1477370820960025

10. Fox, A. M., & Novak, K. J. (2018). Collaborating to Reduce Violence: The Impact of Focused Deterrence in Kansas City. Police Quarterly, 21(3), 283–308. doi: 10.1177/1098611118758701

11. Heap, V. (2020). Exploring the effects of long-term anti-social behaviour victimisation. International Review of Victimology, 27(2), 227–242. doi: 10.1177/0269758020961979

12. Hourigan, K. L. (Ed.). (2019). Narrative Victimology: Speaker, Audience, Timing. The Emerald Handbook of Narrative Criminology, 259–277. doi: 10.1108/978-1-78769-005-920191024

13. Janssen, H. J., Oberwittler, D., & Koeber, G. (2020). Victimisation and Its Consequences for Well-Being: A Between- and Within-Person Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37(1), 101–140. doi: 10.1007/s10940-019-09445-6

14. Kettlewell, N., Morris, R. W., Ho, N., Cobb-Clark, D. A., Cripps, S., & Glozier, N. (2020). The differential impact of major life events on cognitive and affective wellbeing. SSM - Population Health, 10, 100533. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100533

15. Lebrun-Harris, L. A., Sherman, L. J., & Miller, B. (2020). State-Level Prevalence of Bullying Victimisation Among Children and Adolescents, National Survey of Children’s Health, 2016-2017. Public Health Reports, 135(3), 303–309. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912713

16. Mars, D. P. (2021). Theories of inmate victimisation. In T. C. Pratt & J. J. Turanovic (Eds.), Revitalising victimisation theory: Revisions, applications, and new directions (pp. 185–211). New York: Routledge.

17. Wa Teresia, J. N. (2022). Demographic Vulnerability to Crime Victimisation among Urban Residents in Informal Settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. East African Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 72–90. doi: 10.37284/eajis.5.1.618

18. Noble, J., & Jardin, A. (2019). From Victimisation to Fear: Fear of Crime and its Variations Among Victims. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(2), 468–489. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azz051

19. Marktplaats. (2005, June). Personal Security Guide. Retrieved from https://www.marktplaats.nl

20. Pratt, T. C., & Turanovic, J. J. (2021). Revitalising victimisation theory. Revisions, applications, and new directions. New York: Routledge.

21. Schreck, C. J., & Berg, M. T. (2021). What Ideas of Victimization and Vulnerability Mean for Criminological Theory. Revitalising Victimization Theory, 15–55. doi: 10.4324/9781003159629-3

22. Schreck, C. J., Berg, M. T., Fisher, B. S., & Wilcox, P. (2018). That Door You Just Kicked in Was Locked forYourProtection, Not Mine. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(2), 316–345. doi: 10.1177/0022427817751570

23. Turanovic, J. J. (2018). Heterogeneous effects of adolescent violent victimisation on problematic outcomes in early adulthood. Criminology, 57(1), 105–135. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12198

24. Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2019). Thinking About Victimization. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315522333

25. Walters, G. D. (2020). Mediating the victim–offender overlap with delinquent peer associations: a preliminary test of the person proximity hypothesis. Criminal Justice Studies, 33(4), 297–315. doi: 10.1080/1478601x.2020.1711752

26. Walklate, S., Maher, J., McCulloch, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Beavis, K. (2018). Victim stories and victim policy: Is there a case for a narrative victimology? Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 15(2), 199–215. doi: 10.1177/1741659018760105


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Joseph Mwai, Cyprian Kavivya, Stephen Handa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.