On the Role of Intonation in Defining the Boundary of Words in English and Azerbaijani Utterances
Abstract
The article deals with segmental and suprasegmental boundary tools. As is known, the boundary signals of meaningful units come at the beginning or end of the word. The place of stress in the compared languages differs from each other, and this distinction is manifested in boundary signals.
In the live speech, the time spent on the pronunciation of each syllable varies quite a bit, but the time interval spent on the pronunciation of a whole rhythmic group remains unchanged. Occurring, repeatedly stressed syllables in English at a specific time interval are considered a characteristic feature of the rhythm of this language. In other words, in the communication process, rhythmic division in this language is perceived based on temporal-dynamic contrasts between stressed and unstressed syllables. In the communication process, rhythmic division in this language is perceived based on temporal-dynamic contrasts between stressed and unstressed syllables.
Research shows that in the Azerbaijani language, there is one primary stress in the attributive word combinations, which falls on the first component of the word combinations. In this case, the stress in those combinations has a unifying character and forms a rhythmic group. Since English belongs to the group of analytic languages, words in this language undergo very little change within the text. Thus, intra-textual syntactic relations are realized in English, not using suffixes but prepositions.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Akhundov, A. (1973). The phoneme system of the Azerbaijani language. Baku: Maarif (in Azerbaijani).
2. Akhundov, A. (1988). Phonetics of the Azerbaijani language. Baku: Maarif (in Azerbaijani).
3. Akhundov, A., Babayev, S., & Zeynalov, F. (1996). Rhythmic-melodic characteristics of stress in English and Azerbaijani languages. Baku: BSU (in Azerbaijani).
4. Antipova, A. (1979). English speech system. Moscow: Higher School (in Russian).
5. Ashby, P. (2011). Understanding Phonetics. London: Hodder Education (in English).
6. Aslanov, F. (2007). Principles of syntagmatic division of sentences in modern German and Azerbaijani languages. Baku: Mutarjim (in Azerbaijani).
7. Crystal, D. (2008). Dictionary of and Phonology. New York: Blackwell Publishing.
8. Demirchizade, A. (2007). Modern Azerbaijan language (Vol. 1). Baku: East & West (in Azerbaijani).
9. Kingdon, R. (1958). The groundwork of English Stress. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
10. Laver, J., Aronoff, M., & Miller, J. (2013). Linguistic Phonetics. The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell publishing.
11. Roach, P. (2000). English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Veno, V., & Reiss, C. (2020). Formal Generative Pholonology. Retrieved from https://radical.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/VolonecReiss2020.pdf
13. Veysalli, F. (2016). Phonetics and phonology problems. Cambridge: Hertfordshire Press (in Azerbaijani).
14. Zeynalov, F. (2001). On the phonetic means that signal the sound of words and combinations in the speech process. Baku: Mutercim (in Azerbaijani).
15. Zeynalov, F. (2020). Practical English Phonetics. Baku: Mutarjim (in Azerbaijani).
16. Zinder, L. (1979). General phonetics, second edition. Moscow: Higher School (in Russian).
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Alizade Jeyhun Kubra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



