Handling Strategies for Areas and Slums Settlements with the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in Mojokerto Regency, Indonesia

Donny Setyaelvanda Julkarnain, Mohammad Bisri, Moh. Khusaini, Andy Fefta Wijaya

Abstract

The new direction in the current development process is the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The concept of sustainable development is organised into four dimensions: economic, social, environmental and institutional. The Sustainable Development Goals have 17 goals and several indicators for their measurement. The United Nations (UN) 2015 formulated these 17 points of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to overcome the problems that exist in the world. One of the goals contained in the SDG's is goal No 11, namely Sustainable Cities and Communities. One of the world problems discussed in this goal is slums found in Target 11.1 points, namely: "Ensure access to decent, safe and affordable housing and basic services for all and improve the quality of slums". This research method uses mixed methods and then solves with qualitative because it can produce a study of existing phenomena. In this case, case studies greatly help handle settlements and slums in other places and different handling methods as a comparative study. Mojokerto's success in addressing slums in Kedungmaling Village was achieved through strategic integration of various aspects: involving the community as active actors and working group formers, intensive on-the-ground mentoring with facilitators, land management without eviction while consolidating public spaces, strong commitment from local institutions, and program integration through DAK Integration and funding collaboration. This approach, which is aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's), not only targets local solutions but also steers Mojokerto towards international standards of slum upgrading, making a significant impact at both local and national levels.

10.22178/pos.103-33


Keywords


Sustainable Development Goals; Slum Areas; Settlements

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2014). Kajian Indikator [Sustainable Development Goals]. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/48852-ID-kajian-indikator-sustainable-development-goals.pdf (in Indonesian).

2. Patel, Z., Greyling, S., Simon, D., Arfvidsson, H., Moodley, N., Primo, N., & Wright, C. (2017). Local responses to global sustainability agendas: learning from experimenting with the urban sustainable development goal in Cape Town. Sustainability Science, 12(5), 785–797. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0500-y

3. Hitesh, V., & Tathagarta, C. (2020). Actioning the Global Goals for Local Impact. In I. B. Franco, T. Chatterji, E. Derbyshire, & J. Tracey (Eds.), Science for Sustainable Societies. Springer Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9927-6

4. Participatory Slum Upgrading Programme. (2020). Sustainable Urban Development And Agenda 2030: UN-Habitat's Programme Framework. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/1527072751wpdm_SDGsandPSUP.pdf

5. Arandel, C., & Wetterberg, A. (2013). Between “Authoritarian” and “Empowered” slum relocation: Social mediation in the case of Ennakhil, Morocco. Cities, 30, 140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.02.005

6. Viratkapan, V., & Perera, R. (2006). Slum relocation projects in Bangkok: what has contributed to their success or failure? Habitat International, 30(1), 157–174. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.09.002

7. Nakamura, S. (2016). Does slum formalisation without title provision stimulate housing improvement? A case of slum declaration in Pune, India. Urban Studies, 54(7), 1715–1735. doi: 10.1177/0042098016632433

8. Kim, H.-S., Yoon, Y., & Mutinda, M. (2019). Secure land tenure for urban slum-dwellers: A conjoint experiment in Kenya. Habitat International, 93, 102048. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102048

9. Bogaert, K. (2011). The Problem of Slums: Shifting Methods of Neoliberal Urban Government in Morocco. Development and Change, 42(3), 709–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01706.x

10. Carpenter, J. P., Daniere, A. G., & Takahashi, L. M. (2004). Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 533–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.007

11. Semba, R. D., de Pee, S., Kraemer, K., Sun, K., Thorne-Lyman, A., Moench-Pfanner, R., Sari, M., Akhter, N., & Bloem, M. W. (2009). Purchase of drinking water is associated with increased child morbidity and mortality among urban slum-dwelling families in Indonesia. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 212(4), 387–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.09.001

12. Fitria, N., & Setiawan, R. P. (2014). Identifikasi karakteristik lingkungan permukiman kumuh di Kelurahan Kapuk, Jakarta Barat [Identifying environmental characteristics of slums in Kapuk Urban Village, West Jakarta]. Jurnal Teknik Pomits, 3(2) (in Indonesian).

13. Zulkarnaini, W. R., Elfindri, E., & Sari, D. T. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Permukiman Kumuh di Kota Bukittinggi [Factors Affecting Slums in Bukittinggi City]. Jurnal Planologi, 16(2), 169. doi: 10.30659/jpsa.v16i2.5047 (in Indonesian).

14. Setiadi, A. (2014). Tipologi Dan Pola Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kota Bontang [The Typology and Patterns of Slum Improvement Management in Bontang City]. Jurnal Tataloka, 16(4), 220. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.16.4.220-233 (in Indonesian).

15. Barbara, B. P., & Umilia, E. (2014). Clustering Permukiman Kumuh di Kawasan Pusat Kota Surabaya [Clustering Slum Settlements in Surabaya City Centre Area]. Jurnal Teknik Pomits, 3(2) (in Indonesian).

16. Wijaya, D. W. (2016). Perencanaan Penanganan Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh (Studi Penentuan Kawasan Prioritas untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Infrastruktur pada Kawasan Pemukiman Kumuh di Kota Malang) [Planning for Slum Settlement Area Handling (Study on Determining Priority Areas for Infrastructure Quality Improvement in Slum Settlement Areas in Malang City)]. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.21776/ub.jiap.2016.002.01.1 (in Indonesian).

17. Ervianto, W. I., & Felasari, S. (2019). Pengelolaan Permukiman Kumuh Berkelanjutan di Perkotaan [Sustainable Urban Slum Management]. Jurnal Spektran, 7(2), 178–186 (in Indonesian).

18. Arisa, S., Sukendi, S., & Syahril, S. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan Ekowisata Bahari Selat Baru Kabupaten Bengkalis [Development Strategy for Marine Ecotourism in Selat Baru, Bengkalis Regency]. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 15(1), 45. doi: 10.31258/jil.15.1.p.45-53 (in Indonesian).

19. Kusumawardhani, V., Sutjahjo, S. H., Dewi, I. K., & Panjaitan, N. F. (2016). Penyediaan Infrastruktur Pengelolaan Persampahan di Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh Kota Bandung [Provision of Waste Management Infrastructure in Bandung City Slum Neighbourhoods]. Jurnal Permukiman, 11(2), 100. doi: 10.31815/jp.2016.11.100-109 (in Indonesian).

20. Pramantha, R. Q. (2019). Penataan Permukiman Kumuh Dengan Teknologi Risha Di Kampung Deret Petogogan, Jakarta Selatan [Slum Upgrading with Risha Technology in Kampung Deret Petogogan, South Jakarta]. Jurnal Ilmiah Desain & Konstruksi, 18(1), 16–26. doi: 10.35760/dk.2019.v18i1.1955 (in Indonesian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Donny Setyaelvanda Julkarnain, Mohammad Bisri, Moh. Khusaini, Andy Fefta Wijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.