The Concept of "Multi-knowledge" in the Digital Stage: an Epistemological Analysis

Turana Alibayova

Abstract

In the article, through the prism of the interdisciplinary methodological approach, the content of knowledge in digital culture conditions and the epistemological peculiarities of the formation of new knowledge are investigated. For this purpose, knowledge is viewed as the result of intellectual activity in the cognitive-social-cultural environment.

The article shows that knowledge is transforming into "multi-knowledge" at the modern stage. It can be conceived as a processual gestalt with a multifractal character. Multifractality is used because the viewed object consists of a synthesis of different fractals (self-similarities). Therefore, this article considers knowledge a multifractal system (or network) of "fractal sub-knowledge". In that context, processual gestalt means that this multifractal system (or network) transforms from one phase to another, not fragmentarily, but entirely and whole. On this basis, the new multi-knowledge results from the creative transformation of the existing multi-knowledge as a multifractal unit due to the gestalt process.

The following methodological principles are applied in the article: non-linearity, intersubjectivity, emergent interface, and multifractality. It is accepted that there is a close relationship between them.

Applying synergistic synthesis and comparative analysis methods within the logical framework of this methodological approach allowed us to obtain concrete results.



Keywords


multifractality; gestalt transitions; intersubjectivity; hierarchy of knowledge; pluralism of knowledge; creative transformation of knowledge; emergence

Full Text:

PDF


References


Arshinov, V. (1999). Sinergetika kak fenomen postneklassicheskoj nauki [Synergetics as a phenomenon of post-non-classical science]. Moscow: IFRAN (in Russian).

Britanica. (2023). The history of epistemology. Retrieved June 22, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology/The-history-of-epistemology

Britannica. (2023). Epistemology. Retrieved June 22, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology

Budanov, V. (2009). Metodologija sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoj nauke i obrazovanii [Methodology of synergetics in post-non-classical science and in education] (3rd ed.). Moscow: LKI (in Russian).

Cassan, E. (2021). Bacon’s Novum organum. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 38–46. doi: 10.5840/eps202158341

Fuller, S. (2021). The Prophetic Bacon. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 78–86. doi: 10.5840/eps202158345

Garber, D. (2021). Bacon’s Metaphysical Method. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 22–37. doi: 10.5840/eps202158340

Goldman, A., & O’Connor, C. (2019). Social epistemology. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social

Greco, J. (2021). Pritchard’s Case for Veritism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 46–53. doi: 10.5840/eps202158458

Gurbanov, F.M. (2023). Heydar Aliyev va jeni rahbarlik: falsafi va elmi tahlil [Heydar Aliyev and the new leadership: a philosophical and scientific analysis]. Baku: Elm va Tahsil (in Azerbaijani).

Hui, Y. (2019). Recursivity and Contingency. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Jalobeanu, D. (2021). On Metaphysics and Method, Or How to Read Francis Bacon’s Novum organum. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 98–118. doi: 10.5840/eps202158347

Kasavin, I. T. (2022). Creativity in Science as a Social Phenomenon. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 19–29. doi: 10.5840/eps202259336

Lebedev, S. (2019). 6 “K” Post-nonclassical epistemology. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125911808.pdf

Lebedev, S. (2019). The Pluralism of Scientific Truths Criteria: Level Model. Studia Humanitatis, 12(1), 4–14. doi: 10.15393/j12.art.2019.3361

Levin, S. M. (2021). Intellectually Virtuous Inquirer and the Practical Value of Truth. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 54–59. doi: 10.5840/eps202158459

Lynch, W. (2021). Method and Control. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(3), 69–77. doi: 10.5840/eps202158344

McCormick, M. S. (2020). Value beyond truth-value: a practical response to skepticism. Synthese, 198(9), 8601–8619. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02590-7

McLuhan, М. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Morin, E. (1994). Method: Towards a Study of Humankind (Vol. 1). New York: Peter Lang. doi: 10.1177/027046769401400486

Pritchard, D. (2021). In Defense of Veritism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 22–37. doi: 10.5840/eps202158456

Ryan, S. (2021). Wisdom, not Veritism. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 58(4), 60–67. doi: 10.5840/eps202158460

Truncellito, D. (2020). Epistemology. Retrieved June 22, 2023, from https://philpapers.org/rec/TRUE


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Turana Alibayova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.