The Meaning of the Phrase "Degrading Act" in the Criminal Offense of Insulting the President or Vice President

Rahmani Rahmani, Prija Djatmika, Abdul Madjid

Abstract

This study examines Law No 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code, mainly focusing on the provision regarding the insult of the President and/or Vice President in Article 218, paragraph 1. The research employs a normative juridical approach, explicitly analyzing the grammatical interpretation of the phrase "Degrading Act". The findings indicate that the "Degrading Act" encompasses actions that disrupt judicial processes, threaten judges, and insult the judiciary. This includes defacement, writing, drawing, or damaging national symbols, even when such actions deviate from their intended form, size, or colour. Notably, the study demonstrates that the categorization of the "Degrading Act" extends beyond mere legal definitions, encompassing considerations of societal propriety. By providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal and societal dimensions of insulting state leaders, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the evolving legal landscape in Indonesia. Furthermore, the study offers a clearer understanding of the legal aspects concerning insults towards state leaders and contributes to the changing legal landscape in Indonesia.



Keywords


Degrading Act; Meaning; President; Vice President

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Nusantara, A. H. (2011). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia [Rule of Law and Human Rights]. Retrieved from https://pushamuii.org/files.php?type=art&lang=id&id=154 (in Indonesian).

2. Triwahyuningsih, S. (2018). Perlindungan Dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Di Indonesia [Protection and Enforcement of Human Rights (Ham) in Indonesia]. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 113. doi: 10.24269/ls.v2i2.1242 (in Indonesian).

3. Yati, R. (2021). Perlindungan HAM (Hak Asasi Manusia) Dalam Konsepsi Negara Hukum [Protection of human rights in the conception of the rule of law]. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/acwxz (in Indonesian).

4. Marmor, A. (2005). Interpretation and legal theory. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/w/canlii/1993CanLIIDocs9.pdf

5. Solan, L. M., & Gales, T. (2017). Corpus linguistics as a tool in legal interpretation. BYU L. Rev., 1311. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3128&context=lawreview

6. Eisenberg, N., Reykowski, J., & Staub, E. (2016). Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives. New York: Routledge.

7. Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

8. Nuzul Indrawan, L., Arba, & Munandar, A. (2021). Juridicial Review Implementation Of Land Registration According To Government Regulation No. 18 Of 2021 Concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units And Land Registration. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 1(1), 39–56. doi: 10.55047/polri.v1i1.27


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Rahmani Rahmani, Prija Djatmika, Abdul Madjid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.