Stable Connections in Different System Languages and Their Cognitive-Language Features

Aytan Arif Mammadova

Abstract

The general theoretical issues of set phrases have yet to be studied at the level of the requirements of modern linguistics, the position of such language units has not been clearly defined, and their boundaries with other phrases remain uncertain. Issues such as the nature of set phrases, their formation, types, and attitude to other linguistic units, especially words and sentences, features of development, still need to be addressed in linguistics. The article's author explains that set phrases from the point of view of the language are the most exciting units that express the spirit of the people. The main features of stable combinations are their nominative and communicative functions. The author also discusses the differences between set phrases and complimentary combinations of words. Particular attention is paid to connecting complex term combinations to stable combinations.



Keywords


linguistics; Turkic languages; stable combinations; cognitive linguistics; term



References


1. Abdullayev, K. (1999). Azarbajdzhan dili sintaksisinin nazari problemlari [Theoretical problems of Azerbaijani language syntax]. Baku: Maarif (in Azerbaijani).

2. Cruse, D. (2000). Approaches to semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Dzhafarov, N. (2020). Umumi dilchilik [General linguistics]. Baku: Tahsil (in Azerbaijani).

4. Dzhafarova, L. (2013). Badii matnin tashkilinda sabit soz birlashmalarinin rolu [The role of fixed word combinations in the organization of a literary text]. Baku: n. d. (in Azerbaijani).

5. Fahnestock, J. (2005). Rhetoric in the age of cognitive science. Retrieved from http://cogsci.uwaterloo.ca/courses/COGSCI600.2009/Fahnestock(2005).pdf

6. Gadzhieva, N., & Serebrennikov, B. (1986). Istoricheskaja grammatika tjurkiskih jazykov. Sintaksis [Historical grammar of Turkic languages. Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

7. Humboldt, V. (1985). Jazyk i filosofija kul'tury [Language and philosophy of culture]. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

8. Kononov, A. (1956). Grammatika sovremennogo turecuogo literaturnogo jazyka [Grammar of modern Turkish literary language]. Moscow – Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR (in Russian).

9. Lyons, J. (1997). Linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10. Mahmudova, G. (2009). Qypchaq qrupu turk dillarinin frazeologiyasy [Phraseology of Turkic languages of the Kipchak group]. Baku: Nurlan (in Azerbaijani).

11. Ozhegov, S. (1957). O strukture frazeologii [On the structure of phraseology]. In Leksikograficheskij sbornik (pp. 182–219). Moscow: n. d. (in Russian).

12. Ungerer, F. (2004). Word formation. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

13. Vinoqradov, V. (1975). Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

14. Wood, M. (1981). Definition of idiom. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Aytan Arif Mammadova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.