Effect of Locust Bean Pod Ash and Eggshell Ash on the Mortar Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Cement Blends

Olumide Olu Olubajo, Abubakar Jibril, Odey Ade Osha

Abstract

An increase in the generation of biogenic wastes such as locust bean pods and eggshells coupled with the need to drive sustainability in the cement industry has led the use of these wastes as cement replacement materials. The paper aims to investigate the effect of locust bean pod ash (LBPA) and eggshell ash (ESA) on the mortar compressive and flexural strength of ternary cement blends. The LBPA was obtained by calcining locust bean pod (LBP) at various temperatures of 800-900 °C and time of 60–120 minutes at an interval of 50 °C and 30 minutes respectively to determine the optimal conditions. The chemical composition of Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), LBPA and ESA were obtained via X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer and LBPA chemical composition did not satisfy one of the requirements specified by ASTM C618-01 (2001) with SiO2+ Al2O3+Fe2O3 of 30.42 wt. % which is less than 50 wt. %, but satisfies SO3 content requirement of 0.7 wt. % and Loss on Ignition (LOI) of 7.12 wt. % and contains 19.42 wt. % CaO which is within the range of 10-30 wt. % CaO is class C pozzolan. The compressive strength of blended cement mortars at the early age of 2 and 7 days produced better strengths for cement blends with higher ESA content than LBPA especially at LBPA/LBPA-ESA ratio of 0, 0.4 and 0.6 for 2.5 wt. % cement replacement respectively. The early strength gain could be attributed to the provision of more nucleation sites by ESA inclusion which results in the acceleration of cement hydration rate. On the other hand, the enhanced strengths at 28 days of cement blended with various replacement from 2.5–10 wt. % could be attributed to the pozzolanic reaction between the available lime and reactive silica from LBPA despite clinker diminution which was close to control. Another reason for enhanced strength' could be attributed to the increased potassium content by an increase in LBPA content resulting in a gradual strength gain (retarder) muscovite formation K2Al2Si6Al4O20(OH)4. All cement blends experienced an increase in the mortar compressive and flexural strengths as the curing day progressed with some blends producing enhanced strength compared to control especially with 1.5 ESA1LBPA produced the best strength at 50.15 (6.82) N/mm2 against 48.80 (6.80) N/mm2. This enhanced strength could be related to the pozzolanic activity and the high potassium content from LBPA despite clinker diminution, especially at 28 days.



Keywords


Locust Bean Pod Ash; Eggshell Ash; Compressive Strength; Flexural Strength Pozzolan; Flexural Strength; Cement blends

Full Text:

PDF


References


Adama, A., & Jimoh, Y. (2012). Effect of locust bean pod ash on strength properties of weak soils. AU Journal of Technology, 16(1), 21–35.

Afizah Asman, N. S., Dullah, S., Lynn Ayog, J., Amaludin, A., Amaludin, H., Lim, C. H., & Baharum, A. (2017). Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Eggshell Ash and Rice Husk Ash As Partial Replacement Of Cement. MATEC Web of Conferences, 103, 01002. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201710301002

Afolayan J. (2017). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete with Locust Bean Waste Ash. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 42–47.

Akpenpuun, T. D., Akinyemi, B. A., Olawale, O., Aladegboye, O. J., & Adesina, O. I. (2019). Physical, mechanical and microstructural characteristics of cement-locust bean pod ash mortar blend. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 23(3), 377. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v23i3.1

Ali, H., Babatunde, R. I., Ibrahim, A., & B.O, A. (2019). Investigation of Locus Beans Waste Ash as Partial Replacement for Cement in Concrete Structures. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 5(4), 149–153. doi: 10.31695/ijasre.2019.33133

ASTM International. (2001). Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry (ASTM C270-01). doi: 10.1520/c0270-01

ASTM International. (2001). Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete (ASTM C618-00). doi: 10.1520/c0618-00

ASTM International. (2019). Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete (ASTM C618-19). doi: 10.1520/c0595_c0595m-19

Balamurugan, M., & Santhosh, R. (2017). Influence of Egg Shell Ash on the Properties of Cement. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(4), 160–165.

Black, L. (2016). Low clinker cement as a sustainable construction material. Sustainability of Construction Materials, 415–457. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100370-1.00017-2

Bonavetti, V. (1998). Limestone filler cements: Interaction mechanism and its influence on mechanical properties (Doctoral dissertation), University of Center Buenos Aires State, Argentine.

Bonavetti, V. ., Rahhal, V. ., & Irassar, E. . (2001). Studies on the carboaluminate formation in limestone filler-blended cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(6), 853–859. doi: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00491-4

De Weerdt, K., Kjellsen, K. O., Sellevold, E., & Justnes, H. (2011). Synergy between fly ash and limestone powder in ternary cements. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(1), 30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.006

Fazeera, U., Kamran, S., & Yasmin, H. (2016). Viability of Eggshells ash affecting the setting time of cement. Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/record/1112185#.XpIF1_37TDA

Georgescu, M., & Saca, N. (2009). Properties of blended cements with limestone filler and fly ash content. Scientific Bulletin, Series B, 71(3), 11–22.

Ikumapayi, C. M. (2017). Crystal and microstructure analysis of Pozzolanic properties of bamboo leaf ash and locust beans pod ash blended cement concrete. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 20(4), 943. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v20i4.6

Ikumapayi, C., & Akingbomire, S. (2018). Effects of Bamboo Leaf and Locust Beans Pod Ashes on Autogenous Shrinkage Strain and Compressive Strength of Mortar. Journal of engineering and engineering technology, 12(1), 49–53.

Kaya, A. (2010, September). A study on blended bottom ash cements (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12612504/index.pdf

Kumar, P., Vishwakarma, A., & Soni, K. (2016). Laboratory Analysis of Cement Concrete Prepared with EggShells Ash. International Journal of Advanced Technology for Science & Engineering Research, 1(6), 16–23.

Mtallib, M., & Rabiu, A. (2009). Effects of EggShells Ash (ESA) on The Setting Time of Cement. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 28(2), 29–38.

Ndububa, E., & Uloko, J. (2018, July). Locust Bean Pod Ash (LBPA) as a Pozzolanic Material in Concrete. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326631966_LOCUST_BEAN_POD_ASH_LBPA_AS_A_POZZOLANIC_MATERIAL_IN_CONCRETE

Ojewumi, M., Ayomide, A., Obanla, O., Awolu, O., & Ojewumi, E. (2016). Pozzolanic properties of Waste Agricultural Biomass – African Locust Bean Pod Waste. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences, 6(3), 1–7.

Okonkwo, U. N., Odiong I. C., & Akpabio, E. E. (2012). The effects of eggshell ash on strength properties of cement-stabilized lateritic. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 13(1), 18–25.

Olubajo, O., & Osha, O. (2013). Influence of bottom ash and limestone powder on the properties of ternary cement and mortar. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2(7), 1201–1212.

Olubajo, O., Osha, O., El- Nafaty, U., & Adamu, H. (2014). Effect of water-cement ratio on the mechanical properties of blended cement containing bottom ash and limestone. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(12), 1–9.

Olubajo, O., Osha, O., El-Natafty, U., & Adamu, H. (2017). A study on Coal bottom ash and limestone effects on the hydration and physico-mechanical properties of ternary cement blends (Doctoral thesis). Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University.

Péra, J., Husson, S., & Guilhot, B. (1999). Influence of finely ground limestone on cement hydration. Cement and Concrete Composites, 21(2), 99–105. doi: 10.1016/s0958-9465(98)00020-1

Ramachandran, V. S., & Chun-Mei, Z. (1986). Thermal analysis of the 3CaO · Al2O3-CaSO4 · 2H2O-CaCO3-H2O system. Thermochimica Acta, 106, 273–282. doi: 10.1016/0040-6031(86)85139-5

Soroka, I., & Setter, N. (1977). The effect of fillers on strength of cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 7(4), 449–456. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(77)90073-4

Spelta, J. S. de O., & Galdino, A. G. de S. (2018). Bioceramic composite: hen’s eggshell characterization and main applications. Revista Ifes Ciência, 4(1), 9–20. doi: 10.36524/ric.v4i1.323

Tang, Ran An (2010, November). Compressive Strength of Normal strength Concrete (NSC) Using British Standard, Euro code and non-destructive test approaches (Bachelor’s thesis). Retrieved from http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/3297/1/TANG_JIAN_AN.PDF

Venkateswara, R., Kontham, G., Venkata, R., & Chundupalli, S. (2011). Effect of Potassium Chloride (KCl) on Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) Concrete. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 1(2), 103–107.

Winton, A. L., Winton, K. G. B., & Lakhotia, R. L. (2003). Poultry eggs. Jodhpur: Agrobios.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Olumide Olu Olubajo, Abubakar Jibril, Odey Ade Osha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.