Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal

The purpose of the article is to develop the diagnostics of the system of public e-procurement in terms of the risks of its subjects and to develop an approach to minimize the risk associated with changes in the purchase price. It is determined that the most widespread risks in the public e-procurement system in Ukraine, classified on the basis of a subjective approach, are: 1) a conspiracy of participants in the tender process; 2) insufficient level of professionalism; 3) change of purchase price. It has been determined that risk management in the system of public e-procurement should be understood as the diagnostic process (identification, analysis, evaluation), prevention, minimization and elimination of the risks of the customer, supplier and common risks in the stages of post-accession, tender and post-tandem procedures in order to balance financial and legal interests of the state and business. It is established that calculation of the correction of the purchase price (taking into account macroeconomic fluctuations) should take into account the following elements (components): 1) commodity-material element (direct commodity-material expenses as of the base date (opening of a tender offer) and on the date of delivery or start of implementation of the state order); 2) the human element (labor costs (average wage), qualification upgrading by the base date (opening a tender offer) and as of the date of delivery or start of execution of the state order); 3) an element related to other attendance costs (costs of bank servicing of payments, the amount of duty in the case of export-import operations, logistics costs as of the base date (opening a tender offer) and as of the date of delivery or start of execution of the state order); 4) fixed item (percentage in % of purchase price). The prospect of further research in this direction is to improve the system of polycriterial diagnostics of the activities of enterprises, taking into account the presented research results.

business; public e-procurement system; diagnostics; risk; risk management; correction of price

1. Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy. (2017). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi zasady diialnosti antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy [Organizational and legal principles of activity of the antimonopoly committee of Ukraine]. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://www.amc.gov.ua/amku/control/main/uk/publish/article/84306 (in Ukrainian)
[Антимонопольний комітет України. (2017). Організаційно-правові засади діяльності антимонопольного комітету України. Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: http://www.amc.gov.ua/amku/control/main/uk/publish/article/84306].

2. Center for public monitoring and research. (2014). Pro Tsentr hromadskoho monitorynhu ta doslidzhen [About Center for public monitoring and research]. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://www.gmd.center/aboutus (in Ukrainian)
[Центр громадського моніторингу та досліджень. (2017). Про Центр громадського моніторингу та досліджень. Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: http://www.gmd.center/aboutus].

3. DoZorro. (2017). Analitychni instrumenty dlia kontroliu ta monitorynhu publichnykh zakupivel [Analytical tools for monitoring and monitoring public procurement]. Retieved November 1, 2017, from https://dozorro.org/tools (in Ukrainian)
[DoZorro. (2017). Аналітичні інструменти для контролю та моніторингу публічних закупівель. Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: https://dozorro.org/tools].

4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy Competence centre Administrative Capacity Building. (2015). Public procurement guidance for practitioners. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_public_proc_en.pdf

5. Glas, A. H., Schaupp, M., & Essig, M. (2017). An organizational perspective on the implementation of strategic goals in public procurement. Journal of public procurement, 17(4), 572–605.

[Google Scholar]

6. Government of India, Ministry of Finance. (2017). Manual for Procurement of Goods 2017. Retrieved from http://doe.gov.in/sites/default/files/Manual%20for%20Procurement%20of%20Goods%202017_0_0.pdf

7. Hanchak, O. (n. d.). Ryzyky pry zakupivli tovariv, robit i posluh za derzhavni koshty (z tochky zoru zamovnyka ta uchasnyka torhiv) [Risks when purchasing goods, works and services for public funds (from the point of view of the customer and bidder)]. Retrieved November 1, 2017, http://www.mvk.if.ua/uploads/files/dz090212_10.pdf (in Ukrainian)
[Ганчак, О. (n. d.). Ризики при закупівлі товарів, робіт і послуг за державні кошти (з точки зору замовника та учасника торгів). Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: http://www.mvk.if.ua/uploads/files/dz090212_10.pdf].

8. Kiiver, P., & Kodym, J. (2015). Price-quality ratios in value-for-money awards. Journal of public procurement, 15(3), 275–290.

[Google Scholar]

9. Makoba, N., Nyamagere, G., & Eliufoo, H. (2017). E-Procurement Risks and Mitigation: The Case for Tanzania Construction Companies. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 6(4), 180–186.

[Google Scholar]

10. Ministerstvo yustytsii Ukrainy. (2017). Napriamy diialnosti. Retrieved from November 1, 2017, from https://minjust.gov.ua/ndd (in Ukrainian)
[Міністерство юстиції України. (2017). Напрями діяльності. Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/ndd].

11. Pro publichni zakupivli [About Public Procurement] (Ukraine), 25 December 2015, No 922. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/922-19 (in Ukrainian)
[Про публічні закупівлі (Україна), 25 грудня 2015, № 922. Актуально на 01.11.2017. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/922-19].

12. Prozorro. (2017). The Official Resource on Public Purchasing in Ukraine. Retrieved October 20, 2017, from https://prozorro.gov.ua/en/about

13. Pysmenna, M. (2017). Audyt efektyvnosti elektronnoi systemy publichnykh (derzhavnykh) zakupivel [Audit of the effectiveness of the electronic system of public (public) procurement]. Innovative solutions in modern science, 2(11), 1–15 (in Ukrainian)
[Письменна, М. (2017). Аудит ефективності електронної системи публічних (державних) закупівель. Innovative solutions in modern science, 2(11), 1–15].

[Google Scholar]

14. Pysmenna, M. (2017). Implementation of transparency and accountability under risk-based audit of electronic procurement system. The Journal of Zhytomyr State Technological University. Series: Economics, 3(81), 17–24.

[CrossRef]

15. Saastamoinen, J., Reijonen, H., & Tammi, T. (2017). The role of training in dismantling barriers to sme participation in public procurement. Journal of public procurement, 17(1), 1–30.

[Google Scholar]

16. Stilger, P. S., Siderius, J., & Raaij, E. (2017). A comparative study of formulas for choosing the economically most advantageous tender. Journal of public procurement, 17(1), 89–125.

[Google Scholar]

17. Svidronova, M., & Mikus, T. (2015). E-procurement as the ICT innovation in the public services management: case of Slovakia. Journal of public procurement, 15(3), 317–340.

[Google Scholar]

18. Tosko, R. (2016). Metodolohiia otsiniuvannia koruptsiinykh ryzykiv publichnykh zakupivel z metoiu ratsionalnoho vykorystannia derzhavnykh resursiv [Methodology assessment of corruption risks public procurement in order to rational use of state resources]. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, 12. Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1019 (in Ukrainian)
[Тосько, Р. (2016). Методологія оцінювання корупційних ризиків публічних закупівель з метою раціонального використання державних ресурсів. Державне управління: удосконалення та розвиток, 12. URL: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1019].

19. Tosko, R. (2017). Klasternyi analiz koruptsiinykh ryzykiv publichnykh zakupivel na makro-, mezo-, mikrorivniakh dlia stabilizatsii ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Cluster analysis of public procurement corruption risks at the macro, meso, micro stabilization of economic security for Ukraine]. Derzhavno-upravlinski studii, 1. Retrieved from http://www.dus.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=11 (in Ukrainian)
[Тосько, Р. (2017). Кластерний аналіз корупційних ризиків публічних закупівель на макро-, мезо-, мікрорівнях для стабілізації економічної безпеки України. Державно-управлінські студії, 1. URL: http://www.dus.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=11].

[Google Scholar]

20. Yuzevych, V., Klyuvak, O., & Skrynkovskyy, R. (2016). Diagnostics of the system of interaction between the government and business in terms of public e-procurement. Economic Annals-ХХI, 160(7-8), 39–44.

[Google Scholar] [CrossRef]