Euler Homogeneity Equation in Source Parameter Imaging and Deconvolution for Depth-To-Basement Estimation of Ground Magnetic Survey Data
Abstract
This study investigated the depth to bedrock of the Aule Flood landscape using Source Parameter Imaging (SPI) and the Euler deconvolution depth estimation algorithm, which applies Euler homogeneity equations to the acquired ground magnetic potential data. The study used the structural index (N) to describe the shape of the underlying causative body. Euler deconvolution employs the homogeneity equation to precisely measure the potential field and estimate the depth and location of the source causative body. The SPI-based depth estimation technique calculates the local wavenumber and the analytical signal using the Euler homogeneity equation. The observed vertical and horizontal derivatives of the Earth's magnetic field are combined to obtain the local wave number. Conforming to the preliminary findings of the ground magnetic exploration, Euler deconvolution estimated the deepest possible basement level at 31.9.
In comparison, Source Parameter Imaging (SPI) estimated a maximum depth of 74.9 meters. This study shows that the Euler Deconvolution method is more sensitive to shallow magnetic sources than to deeper ones because it uses the vertical derivative, which amplifies shallow-source anomalies. Because the SPI approach is not affected by magnetisation direction, it can provide precise depth estimates in the vicinity of this study. The studied geographic region's bedrock relief portrays an uneven geologic succession with several bedrock deformations, as indicated by results from Source parameter imaging and the Euler deconvolution method for depth estimation, due to broken bedrock and buried metal resources underlying various locations. Since the results obtained support the geology of the research area, these depth-estimating methods are highly reliable.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Ghanbarifar, S., Hosseini, S. H., Ghiasi, S. M., Abedi, M., & Afshar, A. (2024). Joint Euler deconvolution for depth estimation of potential field magnetic and gravity data. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2023.363558.595090
2. Hosseini, S. H., Dehkordi, B. H., Abedi, M., & Oskooi, B. (2020). Implications for a geothermal reservoir at Abgarm, Mahallat, Iran: Magnetic and magnetotelluric signatures. Natural Resources Research, 30(1), 259–272. doi: 10.1007/s11053-020-09739-8
3. Ghiasi, S. M., Hosseini, S. H., Afshar, A., & Abedi, M. (2022). A novel magnetic interpretational perspective on Charmaleh iron deposit through improved edge detection techniques and 3D inversion approaches. Natural Resources Research, 32(1), 147–170. doi: 10.1007/s11053-022-10135-7
4. Okpoli, C. C. (2019). High-Resolution Magnetic Field Signatures Over Akure and Its Environs, Southwestern Nigeria. Earth Science Malaysia, 09–17. doi: 10.26480/esmy.01.2019.09.17
5. Reid, A. B., Ebbing, J., & Webb, S. J. (2014). Avoidable Euler Errors – the use and abuse of Euler deconvolution applied to potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 1162–1168. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12119
6. Reid, A. B., & Thurston, J. B. (2014). The structural index in gravity and magnetic interpretation: Errors, uses, and abuses. Geophysics, 79(4), 61–66. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0235.1
7. Thompson, D. T. (1982). EULDPH: A new technique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics, 47(1), 31–37. doi: 10.1190/1.1441278
8. Alagbe, O. A. (2013). Fracture Distribution within Bowen University Permanent Site and Its Hydrogeologic Implication. Research Journal of Physical Sciences, 1(3), 1-5.
9. Parasnis, D. S. (1986). Principles of Applied Geophysics. Chapman and Hall.
10. Adagunodo, T. A., Sunmonu, L. A., & Adabanija, M. A. (2015). Geomagnetic Signature Pattern Of Industrial Layout Orile Igbon. Advances in Architecture, City and Environment, 1(3), 14-25
11. Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millett, A. J., & Somerton, I. W. (1990). Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics, 55(1), 80–91. doi: 10.1190/1.1442774
12. Blakely, R. J. (1996). Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press.
13. Nabighian, M. N. (1972). The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section; its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics, 37(3), 507–517. doi: 10.1190/1.1440276
14. Nabighian, M. N. (1974). Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section. Geophysics, 39(1), 85–92. doi: 10.1190/1.1440416
15. Smith, R. S., Thurston, J. B., Dai, T., & MacLeod, I. N. (1998). iSPITM— the improved source parameter imaging method. Geophysical Prospecting, 46(2), 141–151. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.00084.x
16. Adelusi, A., Akinlalu, A. A., & Adebayo, S. S. (2013). Geophysical and hydrochemistry methods for mapping groundwater contamination around Aule area, Akure, Southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 5(7), 442–451. doi: 10.5897/ijwree2013.0370
17. Ankeli, S. O., Chukwuma, E. O., Kareem, T., & Adebisi, S. T. (2025). Subsurface Characterisation Using the Electrical Resistivity Method: A Case Study of Itohan Girls Grammar School, Benin City, Nigeria. Path of Science, 11(11), 9001. doi: 10.22178/pos.124-38
18. Ankeli, S. O., Kareem, T., Abioye, I. K., Ahamefule, F. C., Ahamefule, P. C., & Atoyebi, E. O. (2026). Integrated Geophysical Techniques for Near-Surface Engineering Studies at Fadama Rice Farm, Aule, Nigeria. Path of Science, 12(1), 7001. doi: 10.22178/pos.126-16
19. Keating, P., & Pilkington, M. (2004). Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 52(3), 165–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00408.x
20. Ayuba, R. A., & Nur, A. (2018). Depth Estimates Deduced From Source Parameter Imaging of High Resolution Aeromagnetic Data over Part of Nasarawa and Environs, North-Central Nigeria. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 4(4), 54-62.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Samson Oyine Ankeli, Musa Ayinde Tijani, Jeffrey Ilabeshi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



