Genetic and Epigenetic Profiling of Embryos in Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Olasoji O. Agboola, Magnus Adebo Thomas, Jolade Opeyemi Olabanji

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing improves assisted reproductive technology outcomes in high-resource settings, yet implementation in genetically diverse African populations remains virtually absent despite elevated genetic disease burden. This study aimed to characterise the genetic and epigenetic profiles of embryos from Nigerian couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology and assess clinical outcomes following genetic selection. We conducted a prospective, multicentre study across 30 fertility clinics in Nigeria's six geopolitical zones between January 2023 and June 2024, enrolling 246 couples and yielding 1,248 embryos for comprehensive genetic analysis. Embryos underwent next-generation sequencing for chromosomal assessment, targeted testing for monogenic disorders, and epigenetic profiling using bisulfite sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Statistical analysis employed generalised linear mixed models with random intercepts for clinic clustering using R version 4.3.0. Overall, the aneuploidy rate was 48.6% (95% CI: 45.8-51.4%), increasing from 35.4% in women under 35 years to 78.2% in those over 40 years. Single euploid embryo transfers achieved significantly higher implantation rates than morphology-selected transfers: 42.8% versus 26.3% (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.47-2.97, p < 0.001). Preimplantation genetic testing for sickle cell disease demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 98.2%. Nigerian embryos exhibited 1,203 differentially methylated regions compared to European populations and 3-fold greater mitochondrial haplogroup diversity. Genetic embryo selection substantially improves Nigerian assisted reproductive technology outcomes but requires population-specific protocols rather than direct application of international standards.




Keywords


preimplantation genetic testing; aneuploidy; assisted reproductive technology; Nigeria; population genetics; epigenetics

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Munné, S., Kaplan, B., Frattarelli, J. L., Child, T., Nakhuda, G., Shamma, F. N., Silverberg, K., Kalista, T., Handyside, A. H., Katz-Jaffe, M., Wells, D., Gordon, T., Stock-Myer, S., Willman, S., Acacio, B., Lavery, S., Carby, A., Boostanfar, R., Forman, R., … Alfarawati, S. (2019). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomised clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility, 112(6), 1071-1079.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346

2. Rotimi, C. N., Bentley, A. R., Doumatey, A. P., Chen, G., Shriner, D., & Adeyemo, A. (2017). The genomic landscape of African populations in health and disease. Human Molecular Genetics, 26(R2), R225–R236. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx253

3. Martin, A. R., Kanai, M., Kamatani, Y., Okada, Y., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2019). Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nature Genetics, 51(4), 584–591. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x

4. Vermeiden, J. P. W., & Bernardus, R. E. (2013). Are imprinting disorders more prevalent after human in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertility and Sterility, 99(3), 642–651. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.125

5. Chango, A., & Pogribny, I. (2015). Considering Maternal Dietary Modulators for Epigenetic Regulation and Programming of the Fetal Epigenome. Nutrients, 7(4), 2748–2770. doi: 10.3390/nu7042748

6. Marsidi, A. M., Kipling, L. M., Kawwass, J. F., & Mehta, A. (2021). Influence of paternal age on assisted reproductive technology cycles and perinatal outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 116(2), 380–387. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.033

7. Coates, A., Kung, A., Mounts, E., Hesla, J., Bankowski, B., Barbieri, E., Ata, B., Cohen, J., & Munné, S. (2017). Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomised controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility, 107(3), 723-730.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022

8. Vera-Rodriguez, M., Diez-Juan, A., Jimenez-Almazan, J., Martinez, S., Navarro, R., Peinado, V., Mercader, A., Meseguer, M., Blesa, D., Moreno, I., Valbuena, D., Rubio, C., & Simon, C. (2018). Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Human Reproduction, 33(4), 745–756. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey028

9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

10. von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x

11. Andrews, S. (2010). FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Retrieved June 1, 2025, from https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/

12. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30(15), 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

13. Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25(14), 1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

14. Talevich, E., Shain, A. H., Botton, T., & Bastian, B. C. (2016). CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. PLOS Computational Biology, 12(4), e1004873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004873

15. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

16. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 57(1), 289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

17. R Core Team. (2023). The R Project for Statistical Computing. Retrieved June 1, 2025, from https://www.r-project.org/

18. Torroni, A., Achilli, A., Macaulay, V., Richards, M., & Bandelt, H. (2006). Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. Trends in Genetics, 22(6), 339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.04.001

19. Franasiak, J. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Werner, M. D., Upham, K. M., Treff, N. R., & Scott, R. T. (2014). The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertility and Sterility, 101(3), 656-663.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004

20. Soares, P., Alshamali, F., Pereira, J. B., Fernandes, V., Silva, N. M., Afonso, C., Costa, M. D., Musilova, E., Macaulay, V., Richards, M. B., Cerny, V., & Pereira, L. (2011). The Expansion of mtDNA Haplogroup L3 within and out of Africa. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29(3), 915–927. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr245

21. May-Panloup, P., Boucret, L., Chao de la Barca, J.-M., Desquiret-Dumas, V., Ferré-L’Hotellier, V., Morinière, C., Descamps, P., Procaccio, V., & Reynier, P. (2016). Ovarian ageing: the role of mitochondria in oocytes and follicles. Human Reproduction Update, 22(6), 725–743. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw028

22. Piel, F. B., Patil, A. P., Howes, R. E., Nyangiri, O. A., Gething, P. W., Dewi, M., Temperley, W. H., Williams, T. N., Weatherall, D. J., & Hay, S. I. (2013). Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. The Lancet, 381(9861), 142–151. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61229-x

23. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146

24. Schoolcraft, W. B., Fragouli, E., Stevens, J., Munne, S., Katz-Jaffe, M. G., & Wells, D. (2010). Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertility and Sterility, 94(5), 1700–1706. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Olasoji O. Agboola, Magnus Adebo Thomas, Jolade Opeyemi Olabanji

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.