Automated Construction Monitoring Using Drone Technology And Digital Twins

Aleke Christiana Ukamaka, Christopher Mayowa Adeniji, Kofi Yeboah Adjei, Olatunji Olamide Segun, Idris Usman Aliyu, Peter Sanctus Ejiofor

Abstract

The construction industry faces significant challenges in terms of project tracking, quality assurance, and making real-time decisions. The study examines the transformations that are possible when considering the use of drone technology in combination with digital twinning structures to automate construction site monitoring. This paper demonstrates that integrating uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and digital twin models enables the transformation of construction supervision. Key results indicate an increase in monitoring efficiency, with a potential decrease in inspection time of up to 75%, improved accuracy in tracking progress, and cost savings resulting from early identification of problems. The embedding enables real-time data synchronisation between the actual construction site and a virtual digital twin model, supporting predictive capabilities and active project management. This study contributes to a strategy guide on industry adoption, technical difficulty, regulatory, and organisational issues, emphasising the importance of this technology convergence to innovative construction practices.


10.22178/pos.121-6


Keywords


Drones; Digital Twins; Construction Monitoring; Automation; Smart Construction; Real-Time Data; UAV; Project Management

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Salem, T., Dragomir, M., & Chatelet, E. (2024). Strategic integration of drone technology and digital twins for optimal construction project management. Applied Sciences, 14(11), 4787. doi: 10.3390/app14114787

2. Alhammadi, S. A., Tayeh, B. A., Alaloul, W. S., & Salem, T. J. (2021). Risk Management Strategies in Construction Organisations. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 15(1), 406–413. doi: 10.2174/1874149502115010406

3. Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., & Rezgui, Y. (2020). Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Automation in Construction, 114, 103179. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179

4. Omrany, H., Al-Obaidi, K. M., Husain, A., & Ghaffarianhoseini, A. (2023). Digital Twins in the Construction industry: A comprehensive review of current implementations, enabling technologies, and future directions. Sustainability, 15(14), 10908. doi: 10.3390/su151410908

5. Rao, A. S., Radanovic, M., Liu, Y., Hu, S., Fang, Y., Khoshelham, K., Palaniswami, M., & Ngo, T. (2022). Real-Time Monitoring of Construction Sites: Sensors, Methods, and Applications. Automation in Construction, 136, 104099. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104099

6. Ullo, S. L., & Sinha, G. R. (2020). Advances in Smart Environment Monitoring Systems Using IoT and Sensors. Sensors, 20(11), 3113. doi: 10.3390/s20113113

7. Anwar, N., Izhar, M. A., & Najam, F. A. (2018). Construction Monitoring and Reporting using Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The Tenth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-10)

8. Fan, J., & Saadeghvaziri, M. A. (2019). Applications of Drones in Infrastructure: Challenges and Opportunities. Zenodo (CERN European Organisation for Nuclear Research). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3566281

9. Berie, H. T., & Burud, I. (2018). Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Earth Resources Monitoring: A Focus on Evaluating Potentials for Forest Monitoring in Ethiopia. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1), 326–335. doi: 10.1080/22797254.2018.1432993

10. Feng, H., Chen, Q., & De Soto, B. G. (2021). Application of Digital Twin Technologies in Construction: An Overview of Opportunities and Challenges. Proceedings of the ISARC. doi: 10.22260/isarc2021/0132

11. Hou, L., Wu, S., Zhang, G., Tan, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Literature Review of Digital Twins Applications in Construction Workforce Safety. Applied Sciences, 11(1), 339. doi: 10.3390/app11010339

12. Piras, G., Agostinelli, S., & Muzi, F. (2024). Digital Twin Framework for Built Environment: A review of Key Enablers. Energies, 17(2), 436. doi: 10.3390/en17020436

13. Salem, T., & Dragomir, M. (2022). Options for and Challenges of Employing Digital Twins in Construction Management. Applied Sciences, 12(6), 2928. doi: 10.3390/app12062928

14. Pal, A., Lin, J. J., Hsieh, S., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2023). Automated vision-based construction progress monitoring in the built environment through a digital twin. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100247. doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100247

15. Jarahizadeh, S., & Salehi, B. (2024). A Comparative analysis of UAV photogrammetric software performance for forest 3D modelling: a case study using AGISoft Photoscan, PIX4DMapper, and DJI Terra. Sensors, 24(1), 286. doi: 10.3390/s24010286

16. Gabara, G., & Sawicki, P. (2019). Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A case study on an investment area. Sensors, 19(23), 5229. doi: 10.3390/s19235229

17. Ahmed, F., Mohanta, J. C., Keshari, A., & Yadav, P. S. (2022). Recent Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Review. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47(7), 7963–7984. doi: 10.1007/s13369-022-06738-0

18. Qi, Q., Zhao, D., Liao, T. W., & Tao, F. (2018). Modelling of Cyber-Physical Systems and Digital Twin Based on Edge Computing, Fog Computing and Cloud Computing Towards Smart Manufacturing. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. doi: 10.1115/msec2018-6435

19. Moeini, S., Oudjehane, A., Baker, T., & Hawkins, W. (2017). Application of an interrelated UAS-BIM system for construction progress monitoring, inspection and project management. PM World Journal, 6(9), 1-13.

20. Dupont, Q. F., Chua, D. K., Tashrif, A., & Abbott, E. L. (2017). Potential Applications of UAVs along the Construction Value Chain. Procedia Engineering, 182, 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.155

21. Rui, Y., Yaik-Wah, L., & Siang, T. C. (2021). Construction Project Management based on Building Information Modelling (BIM). Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(6), 2055–2061. doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090633

22. Koon, M. (2016). Construction of Sacramento Kings Arena Using Award-Winning Drone Monitoring System Developed at Illinois. Retrieved from https://cee.illinois.edu/news/construction-sacramento-kings-arena-using-award-winning-drone-monitoring-system-developed

23. Hirose, M., Xiao, Y., Zuo, Z., Kamat, V. R., Zekkos, D., & Lynch, J. (2015). Implementation of UAV localisation methods for a mobile post-earthquake monitoring system. IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS) Proceedings, 66–71. doi: 10.1109/eesms.2015.7175854

24. Zhang, P., Li, N., Jiang, Z., Fang, D., & Anumba, C. J. (2018). An agent-based modelling approach for understanding the effect of worker-management interactions on construction workers' safety-related behaviours. Automation in Construction, 97, 29–43. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.015

25. Behzadi, A. (2016). Using Augmented and Virtual Reality Technology in the Construction Industry. American Journal of Engineering Research, 5(12), 350-353.

26. Tayeh, B. A., Salem, T. J., Aisheh, Y. I. A., & Alaloul, W. S. (2020). Risk Factors Affecting the Performance of Construction Projects in the Gaza Strip. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 14(1), 94–104. doi: 10.2174/1874149502014010094

27. Draghici, A., Dursun, S., Bașol, O., Boatca, M. E., & Gaureanu, A. (2022). The Mediating Role of Safety Climate in the Relationship between Transformational Safety Leadership and Safe Behaviour – The Case of Two Companies in Turkey and Romania. Sustainability, 14(14), 8464. doi: 10.3390/su14148464

28. Noghabaei, M., Heydarian, A., Balali, V., & Han, K. (2020). Trend analysis on the adoption of virtual and augmented reality in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Data, 5(1), 26. doi: 10.3390/data5010026

29. Elshafey, A., Saar, C. C., Aminudin, E. B., Gheisari, M., & Usmani, A. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model for Augmented Reality and Building Information Modelling Integration in the Construction Industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 25, 161–172. doi: 10.36680/j.itcon.2020.010


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Aleke Christiana Ukamaka, Christopher Mayowa Adeniji, Kofi Yeboah Adjei, Olatunji Olamide Segun, Idris Usman Aliyu, Peter Sanctus Ejiofor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.