Stakeholder Cooperation Patterns in Overcoming Tourism Scams in the KEK (Special Economic Zone) Tourism Area of Mandalika, Cen-tral Lombok, Indonesia
Abstract
This research aims to identify forms of stakeholder cooperation to address tourism scams in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone, Central Lombok. Scam tourism is a fraudulent activity perpetrated by perpetrators to profit personally, ultimately damaging a destination's reputation and undermining tourism sustainability. This research uses a qualitative case study approach. The researchers collected data through non-participant observation, distribution of questionnaires, in-depth interviews with key actors—including the Central Lombok Tourism Office, the police/tourist protection task force, ITDC Mandalika, business owners, and local communities—and documentation. The data analysis technique employs the Miles and Huberman model, which comprises four stages: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Source triangulation is used to verify and validate data by comparing information across informants to ensure the credibility of the research findings. The research results indicate that a pattern of cooperation has emerged, with the Central Lombok Tourism Office as the primary driver. Support is provided by security personnel, ITDC Mandalika, local communities, and business operators through several initiatives, including the formation of a tourism security team, training, and law enforcement against fraudulent actors.
Nevertheless, the implementation of this collaboration has not been optimal. Public education remains limited; the case-reporting system is not technology-based; and active public participation in the decision-making process remains minimal. The main constraints include weak inter-agency coordination and insufficient human resources. This research recommends stronger inter-sectoral coordination, increased human resource capacity, the development of digital reporting systems, and the active involvement of the community and business actors. The research recommends formalising cooperation through joint regulations, emphasising continuous education, emphasising the role of the community, establishing an integrated task force, integrating reporting, and optimising technology to build sustainable destinations.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. World Economic Forum. (2022). Travel & Tourism Development Index 2021: Rebuilding for a Sustainable and Resilient Future Insight Report. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Travel_Tourism_Development_2021.pdf
2. Pitana, I., & Gayatri, P. (2005). Sosiologi pariwisata [Sociology of tourism]. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=-Aa9nC0AAAAJ&citation_for_view=-Aa9nC0AAAAJ:UebtZRa9Y70C (in Indonesian).
3. ITDC. (2021). 2021 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://itdcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ITDC-Report-2021-compressed.pdf
4 Putra, I. N. D., & Hitchcock, M. (2021). Bali Imagined in the Context of Tourism. E-Journal of Tourism, 197. doi: 10.24922/eot.v8i2.77749
5. Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., Sakti, E., Zakik, Z., Syarif, M., Safkaur, O., & Said, J. (2023). Explore the potential for tourist scams in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(2), 362. doi: 10.14505/jemt.v14.2(66).06
6. ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Retrieved from https://acfepublic.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2022+Report+to+the+Nations.pdf
7. Lombok Post. (2022). Modus Penipuan, Sewa Mobil untuk WSBK Mandalika, Ternyata Digadai [Scam Modus Operandi: Car Rental for WSBK Mandalika Turns Out to Be Pawned]. Retrieved from https://lombokpost.jawapos.com/hukrim/1502783506/modus-penipuan-sewa-mobil-untuk-wsbk-mandalika-ternyata-digadai?utm (in Indonesian).
8. Fahri, H. (2023). Investigasi Ombudsman Temukan Praktik Pungli Jejali Pengelolaan Parkir KEK Mandalika, ITDC dan Pemda akan Dipanggil [Ombudsman Investigation Finds Illegal Fees in Mandalika Special Economic Zone Parking Management; ITDC and Local Government to be Summoned]. Retrieved from https://insidelombok.id/berita-utama/investigasi-ombudsman-temukan-praktik-pungli-jejali-pengelolaan-parkir-kek-mandalika-itdc-dan-pemda-akan-dipanggil/ (in Indonesian).
9. Van Nguyen, H., Lee, D., & Warren, C. (2022). A comparison of stakeholder perspectives of tourism development in Sapa, Vietnam. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 23(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1177/14673584221075179
10. Carolina, N. A., & Wulandari, N. A. (2024). Anti-fraud Strategy in tourism destination organisations: The role of leader integrity, ethical leadership and trust in the leader. Pusaka Journal of Tourism Hospitality Travel and Business Event, 177–190. doi: 10.33649/pusaka.v6i1.220
11. Redyanto, F., Salahudin, S., & Salviana, V. (2018). Model Kerjasama Antar Stakeholders Dalam Pengembangan Wisata Budaya Dusun Sejo Kabupaten Pasuruan [Model of Cooperation Among Stakeholders in the Development of Cultural Tourism in Sejo Hamlet, Pasuruan Regency]. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/MODEL-KERJASAMA-ANTAR-STAKEHOLDERS-DALAM-WISATA-Redyanto-Salahudin/9075f765912721e56debb4040a1073111d330eb7#citing-papers (in Indonesian).
12. Kvasnová, D., Gajdošík, T., & Maráková, V. (2019). Are partnerships enhancing tourism destination competitiveness? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(3), 811–821. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967030811
13. Susilowati, A. P. E., Rachmawati, R., & Rijanta, R. (2025). Smart village concept in Indonesia: ICT as determining factor. Heliyon, 11(1), e41657. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41657
14. Sadad, A., Simanjuntak, H. T. R. F., Meilani, N., Meiwanda, G., & Amri, K. (2023). Kolaborasi Pengelolaan Desa Wisata Berbasis Masyarakat Menuju Desa Wisata Kategori Maju Di Desa Tanjung Punak Kecamatan Rupat Utara Kabupaten Bengkalis [Community-Based Tourism Village Management Collaboration Towards an Advanced Tourism Village in Tanjung Punak Village, North Rupat Subdistrict, Bengkalis Regency]. SWARNA Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(9), 962–968. doi: 10.55681/swarna.v2i9.874 (in Indonesian)
15. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
16. Kurniati, P. S., Zakiyani, S. N., Yuwono, F. A. N., & Munigar, W. (2023). Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pembangunan Dan Pengembangan Pariwisata Di Wilayah Kota Bandung [Government Policy on Tourism Development and Promotion in the City of Bandung]. Journal Caraka Prabu, 7(2), 1–16. doi: 10.36859/jcp.v7i2.1723 (in Indonesian).
17. Levi-Faur, D. (2010). Regulation & Regulatory Governance. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, 1.
18. Adestya, P., Hidayat, Y., & Azkia, L. (2021). Peran pemerintah dalam meningkatkan daya tarik wisata Candi Agung di Amuntai Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara [The role of the government in enhancing the appeal of Candi Agung in Amuntai, Hulu Sungai Utara Regency]. PADARINGAN Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi, 3(3), 483. doi: 10.20527/padaringan.v3i3.4020 (in Indonesian).
19. Rahmawati, S., & Rizki, A. (2020). Pengawasan Pemerintahan [Government Oversight]. Bandung: Cendekia Press. (in Indonesian).
20. Finta, D., & Malau, H. (2024). Kendala pengawasan izin usaha pembangunan homestay di kawasan wisata Lembah Harau Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota [Obstacles in supervising business permits for homestay development in the Lembah Harau tourist area, Lima Puluh Kota Regency]. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 6(1), 9. doi: 10.47134/villages.v6i1.196 (in Indonesian).
21. Wikipedia. (2025). Socialisation. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialization
22. La Are, R., Hendratono, T., Ihalau, J. J., Bahri, A. S., & Rahmawati, E. (2025). Visualising Tourism Sustainability through Smart Tourism Technology in Lake Toba, Indonesia. Journal Syntax Transformation, 6(4). doi: 10.46799/jst.v6i4.1077
23. AFC. (2021). Mitigating the Risk of Common Fraud Schemes: Insights from SEC Enforcement Actions. Retrieved from https://www.thecaq.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/afc-mitigating-the-risk-of-common-fraud-schemes-2021-01.pdf
24. Akud, N. N., & Karim, A. (2025). Penggunaan dan pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Dunia Pariwisata: Mini Literature Review [The Use and Utilisation of Information Technology in the Tourism Industry: A Mini Literature Review]. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 11(1), 42–47. doi: 10.52643/jti.v11i1.6309 (in Indonesian).
25. Azzopardi, E., & Nash, R. (2012). A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis. Tourism Management, 35, 222–233. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007
26. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2012). Organisational Behaviour. Pearson Education.
27. Sari, A. R. (2024). Multi-Sector Collaboration For Sustainable Tourism Management: Insights From Central Lombok Regency, Indonesia. Jurnal Kelola Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 16(3), 239–254. doi: 10.54783/jv.v16i3.1262
28. Azizurrohman, M., Ilyas, G. B., Ginting, Y. M., Sudiyanti, S., & Hasanah, Y. N. (2023). Analysis of community readiness for the Mandalika Special Economic Zone: using the Sapta Pesona Standard. Journal of Economics Research and Social Sciences, 7(2), 166–174. doi: 10.18196/jerss.v7i2.16414
29. Wondirad, A., Tolkach, D., & King, B. (2019). Stakeholder Collaboration is a Major Factor for Sustainable Ecotourism Development in Developing Countries. Tourism Management, 78, 104024. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104024
30. Damayanti, R. M., Pramesti, D., Ayuninggar, L., Martini, E., & Rosdaliva, M. (2025). Readiness for digital financial transformation: the case of micro, small and medium enterprises in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 19(19), 57–66. doi: 10.47836/ijeam.19.1.04
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuniati, Lalu Thohir, Hairil Anwar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



