Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal

This study investigates the role of cohesion in Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀'s A Spell of Good Things, using Halliday and Hasan's (1976) theory of cohesion as a framework. The research aims to analyze how lexical and referential cohesion contribute to the narrative coherence and thematic expression in the novel. Cohesion, a key linguistic mechanism, is explored through various devices, including repetition, synonymy, collocation, and reference, which link different parts of the text and reinforce key themes such as poverty, political corruption, and social inequality. The study highlights the distinction between cohesion and coherence, noting that while cohesion ensures structural unity, coherence is achieved through the reader’s interpretation. Through a detailed textual analysis, the research demonstrates how Adébáyọ̀ employs cohesive devices to maintain the flow of the plot, deepen character development, and engage readers emotionally. Lexical cohesion, particularly through thematic repetition of words like "school fees," "poverty," and "hunger," effectively anchors the narrative in the socio-political realities of contemporary Nigeria. Referential cohesion, achieved through pronouns, demonstratives, and proper nouns, facilitates smooth transitions between characters and events, ensuring that readers remain engaged and oriented throughout the story. The findings suggest that cohesive devices are not only essential for textual organization but also contribute significantly to the novel's emotional depth and socio-political critique. The research adds to the field of discourse analysis by illustrating the importance of cohesion in African literature and offering insights into the linguistic strategies that shape reader experience and meaning construction in Nigerian fiction.

1. Carrell, P. L. (1984). Comments on Patricia Carrell’s “Cohesion Is Not Coherence”. The Author Responds. TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 161–168. doi: 10.2307/3586347

2. Adébáyọ̀, A. (2023). Spell of Good Things: A novel. Knopf

3. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315836010

4. Keevallik, L. (2009). Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 1071–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.002

5. Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in Written Texts of Students of Faculty of Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(2), 93. doi: 10.11114/jets.v5i2.1998

6. Tseng, C.-I., Laubrock, J., & Bateman, J. A. (2021). The impact of multimodal cohesion on attention and interpretation in film. Discourse, Context & Media, 44, 100544. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100544

7. Gómez González, M. de los Á. (2018). Revisión del concepto de cohesión léxica. Un análisis de corpus y sistémico-funcional combinados. Quaderns de Filologia - Estudis Lingüístics, 23, 105–127. doi: 10.7203/qf.23.13523

8. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge.

9. Alotaibi, H. (2014). The Role of Lexical Cohesion in Writing Quality. (2014). International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(1). doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.261

10. Ekaningsih, N. (2019). Analysis Of Casual Conversation In Spontaneity, Interactivity, Interpersonally And Coherence Features. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2), 131. doi: 10.25134/ieflj.v5i2.1809

11. Hossain, M. A. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis of Literary Texts of NCTB English for Today (Class II - Class VIII) Textbooks: A Qualitative Study. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(9), 434–444. doi: 10.36347/sjahss.2022.v10i09.006

12. Salkie, R. (1995). Text and Discourse Analysis. Routledge.

13. Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Routledge.

14. Kim Nhung, L. T., & Huu Hiep, N. (2023). The Effects of Thematic Progression in Improving Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Writing. English Language Teaching, 16(6), 126. doi: 10.5539/elt.v16n6p126

15. Bello, M., & Sharndama, E. C. (2017). An Analysis of Grammatical Cohesion in Written Labour Texts: A Study of Selected Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) Communiqués. Ahyu: A Journal of Language and Literature, 1, 23–35. doi: 10.56666/ahyu.v1i.97

16. Onuoha, O. P., & Ohanyere, L. O. (2022). Identity as life & Death in My Name Is Okoro. Tamaddun, 20(2), 283–292. doi: 10.33096/tamaddun.v20i2.167

17. Jinam, E. (2023). The Role of Cohesion in Text Organization. Full Text Book Of Ijher Congress, 7, 47–64. doi: 10.47832/ijhercongress7-4

18. Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1984). Cohesion in English. Longman.

19. Uru, O. B., Sudirman, A., & Nugroho, A. D. (2021). Exploring Cohesions in EFL Academic Writing: A State of the Art on the Study of Cohesions. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 3(2), 141–149. doi: 10.31849/elsya.v3i2.6730

20. Gerrig, R. J. (2018). Experiencing Narrative Worlds. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429500633

21. Rahman, Y. A. (2020). Lexical Collocation Productivity Of Indonesian L2 Writers In Essay: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 6(2). doi: 10.31949/educatio.v6i2.757

22. Meurer, J. (2008). Relationships Between Cohesion And Coherence In Essays And Narratives. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242149024_RELATIONSHIPS_BETWEEN_COHESION_AND_COHERENCE_IN_ESSAYS_AND_NARRATIVES

23. Tajjiou, A. (2024). The ‘Comparative African Literatures’ Project: Challenges and Opportunties. Comparative Literature: East & West, 8(1), 89–107. doi: 10.1080/25723618.2024.2368350

24. Putra, E. D., Samudra, H., & Susanti, A. (2022). Cohesion and Coherence: An Analysis of the Students’ Narrative Writings. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(1), 16–24. doi: 10.30650/ajte.v4i1.2287

25. Dingemanse, M. (2015). Ideophones and reduplication. Studies in Language, 39(4), 946–970. doi: 10.1075/sl.39.4.05din

26. Behnam, A. (1996). A Stylistic Study of Cohesive Features in English Prose Fiction with Some Pedagogical Implications for Non-Native Contexts. Retrieved from https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/6049/1/388696.pdf

27. Kashiha, H. (2022). An Investigation of the Use of Cohesive Devices in ESL Students’ Essay Writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(18). doi: 10.7176/jep/13-18-02

28. Toolan, M. (2014). Language in Literature. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203763537

29. Chapman, M. (2003). African Literature, African Literatures: Cultural Practice or Art Practice? Research in African Literatures, 34(1), 1–10.

30. Wang, W., Chen, W., Shi, S., Tong, L., & Duan, M. (2024). A Corpus-Based Study on Cohesion Development in Writing by EFL Novices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(3), 772–786. doi: 10.17507/jltr.1503.10

31. De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. Longman.

32. Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford University Press.

33. Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O., Jančaříková, R., Miššíková, G., & Povolná, R. (2017). Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse. doi: 10.5817/cz.muni.m210-8857-2017

34. Darong, H. C., Jem, Y. H., & Guna, S. (2022). Lexical Cohesion Devices in Students’ Narrative Text and Its Pedagogigal Implication in Language Teaching (A Discourse- Semantics Point of View). Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(1), 362–374. doi: 10.23960/jpp.v12.i1.202228