Deep Learning Approaches to Identify Subtle Anomalies in Prenatal Ultrasound Imaging

Olasoji O. Agboola, Oludare Olukayode Kuye, Thomas K. Adenowo

Abstract

This research investigated deep learning approaches for detecting subtle anomalies in prenatal ultrasound imaging. Congenital anomalies affect approximately 6% of births worldwide, with detection rates for subtle defects varying significantly based on operator expertise. A multi-institutional dataset comprising 12,450 prenatal ultrasound examinations from three tertiary care centres was employed to develop and evaluate multiple deep learning architectures, including modified convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, autoencoders, and feature fusion approaches. The ensemble approach, which combines these architectures, achieved an overall accuracy of 91.4% and 89.8% accuracy for subtle anomalies, specifically substantially exceeding previous benchmarks. Feature visualisation confirmed that models focused on anatomically appropriate regions when making predictions. Performance varied across anomaly categories, with cardiac defects presenting the most significant challenges. The research identified meaningful relationships between model confidence and clinical significance, with higher sensitivity for anomalies requiring immediate intervention. Expert evaluation confirmed that models occasionally detected subtle findings that were missed during routine interpretation, suggesting a potential complementary role between automated systems and human expertise. The findings demonstrate significant progress toward addressing the challenges of subtle anomaly detection in prenatal ultrasound while identifying important directions for future refinement.



Keywords


Healthcare policymakers; Healthcare organisations; Data governance; Privacy protocols; Ethical implementation; Data protection; Robust data management; Integration of diagnostic technologies

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Miguel, O. X., Kaczmarek, E., Lee, I., Ducharme, R., Dingwall-Harvey, A. L. J., White, R. R., Bonin, B., Aviv, R. I., Hawken, S., Armour, C. M., Dick, K., & Walker, M. C. (2024). Deep Learning Prediction of Renal Anomalies for Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis. Scientific Reports, 14(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59248-4

2. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539

3. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., & Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. arXiv (Cornell University). doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1605.08695

4. Gulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., Kim, R., Raman, R., Nelson, P. C., Mega, J. L., & Webster, D. R. (2016). Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal Fundus photographs. JAMA, 316(22), 2402. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216

5. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-NET: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. arXiv (Cornell University). doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1505.04597

6. Chen, Y., Yang, X., Wei, Z., Heidari, A. A., Zheng, N., Li, Z., Chen, H., Hu, H., Zhou, Q., & Guan, Q. (2022). Generative Adversarial Networks in Medical Image augmentation: A review. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 144, 105382. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105382

7. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2020). Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), 139–144. doi: 10.1145/3422622

8. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). doi: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.243

9. Shahrivar, R. Y., Karami, F., & Karami, E. (2023). Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches. Biomimetics, 8(7), 519. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8070519

10. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. L. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimisation. arXiv (Cornell University). doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980

11. Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H. (2017). Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 19(1), 221–248. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442

12. Ardila, D., Kiraly, A. P., Bharadwaj, S., Choi, B., Reicher, J. J., Peng, L., Tse, D., Etemadi, M., Ye, W., Corrado, G. S., Mani, H., Cai, X., Motta, V., Mossin, A., Jeon, S., Kim, J., Park, S. H., Lee, J. H., Chen, P. C., & Shetty, S. (2019). End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nature Medicine, 25(6), 954-961.

13. Dhar, T., Dey, N., Borra, S., & Sherratt, R. S. (2023). Challenges of Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis—Improving Explainability and Trust. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 4(1), 68–75. doi: 10.1109/tts.2023.3234203

14. Alotaibi, A. (2025). Ensemble Deep Learning Approaches in Health Care: A Review. Computers, Materials & Continua, 1–10. doi: 10.32604/cmc.2025.061998


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Olasoji O. Agboola, Oludare Olukayode Kuye, Thomas K. Adenowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.