Ethical and Corporate Governance Failures in the Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal (2016): Impact And Implications For Corporate Responsibility
Abstract
This study investigates the corporate governance and ethical failure that led to the 2016 Wells Fargo stage account crisis, one of the most notorious recent bank scandals. The scandal erupted when 3.5 million unauthorised accounts were opened by bank employees working under intense pressure to meet impossible sales targets. This study reveals significant ethical shortcomings, such as support for improper selling practices and poor management of whistleblower complaints. Additionally, it considers corporate governance shortcomings, i.e., inadequate board and management controls, permitting the deceptive activities to proceed. Ethical egoism, a theory whose core is self-interest, is mentioned in comparison to the scandal, showing how the profit motive incentives resulted in improper behaviour.
Additionally, the paper discusses the implications of corporate responsibility, which include the need for stronger governance structures, ethical leadership, and regulation to prevent such scandals. The research emphasises the need for ethical standards in financial institutions to protect consumers, enhance investor confidence, and ensure long-term corporate sustainability. Finally, it calls for re-examining corporate cultures that prioritise profits at the expense of ethics and impose stringent internal controls to prevent further misconduct.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Aina, A. T. (2022). Financial Ethics: The Wells Fargo scandal. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/75697843/Financial_Ethics_The_Wells_Fargo_scandal
2. Keane, A., & Tindera, M. (2024). Why auditors are missing red flags. Behind the Money. Retrieved from https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/why-auditors-are-missing-red-flags/id1376303362?i=1000656347554
3. Egan, M. (2020). US government fines Wells Fargo $3 billion for its 'staggering' fake accounts scandal. CNN Business.
4. Directors of the Board of Wells Fargo & Company. (2017). Independent Directors of the Board of Wells Fargo & Company Sales Practices Investigation Report. Retrieved from https://lowellmilkeninstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WF-Board-Report.pdf
5. Veetikazhi, R., & Krishnan, G. (2018). Wells Fargo: Fall from Great to Miserable: A Case Study on Corporate Governance Failures. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 8(1), 88–99. doi: 10.1177/2277977918803476
6. Committee On Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs. (2016). An Examination Of Wells Fargo's Unauthorised Accounts And The Regulatory Response. Washington: Government Publishing Office.
7. Committee On Financial Services. (2020). Holding Wells Fargo Accountable: Examining The Role Of The Board Of Directors In The Bank's Egregious Pattern Of Consumer Abuses. Washington: Government Publishing Office.
8. Austin-Campbell, S. (2021). Wells Fargo: an examination of a corporate scandal and the economic impact on the value of the stock. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3895348
9. Learnsignal. (2016). The Wells Fargo Fake Accounts Scandal: A Comprehensive Overview. Retrieved from https://www.learnsignal.com/blog/wells-fargo-fake-accounts-scandal-overview-2/
10. OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. In OECD Publishing eBooks. doi: 10.1787/9789264236882-en
11. Osman, S. M., & Noel, M. D. (2024). Bank scandal contagion: Evidence from the Wells Fargo cross selling scandal. Global Finance Journal, 63, 101044. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101044
12. Sweet, K. (2024). US eases restrictions on Wells Fargo after years of strict oversight following scandal. Associated Press.
13. Ivlampie, V. (2017). Ethical egoism, a failure of moral theories. Lumen Proceedings. doi: 10.18662/lumproc.rsacvp2017.34
14. Rand, A. (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. Signet
15. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
16. Zogning, F. (2017). Agency Theory: A Critical Review. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(2).
17. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1998). Separation of ownership and control. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.94034
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Bolouboye Micah Eradiri, Glory David Adebayo, Princess Abies Ogieriakhi, Ifeanyi Kingsley Egbuna, David Opeyemi Adebayo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




