Addressing the Root Causes of Plagiarism: Strategies For Promoting Originality and Critical Thinking in Student Writing at Tertiary Institutions

Ejuchegahi Anthony Angwaomaodoko

Abstract

Plagiarism is a common problem in institutions of higher learning and defeats the very purpose of higher education, which is to develop critical thinking and enhance intellectual integrity. The study aims to explore the various causes of plagiarism and strategies for promoting originality and critical thinking among students in tertiary institutions. The study evaluates different types of plagiarism, including accidental, self-plagiarism, and intentional plagiarism, while identifying the root causes among students, such as family pressure, lack of self-control, poor attitude towards learning, poor time management, and inappropriate usage of digital resources or technology. The research also indicated that addressing and mitigating all these factors requires a dynamic approach, utilising plagiarism detection tools, educating students on the importance of academic integrity, and creating awareness of plagiarism as an unethical academic practice. The paper also emphasises the need for originality and critical thinking through active learning, peer collaboration, and continuous assessment. By encouraging students to use original content and actively develop their thoughts, institutions can reduce the rate of plagiarism. In conclusion, institutions must create an environment that fosters originality and critical thinking in writing.

10.22178/pos.115-17


Keywords


Plagiarism; Students; Education; Originality; Critical Thinking

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Anney, V. N., & Mosha, M. A. (2015). Student's plagiarisms in higher learning institutions in the era of improved internet access: Case study of developing countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(13), 203–217.

2. Sibomana, E., Ndayambaje, I., & Uwambayinema, E. (2018). Plagiarism in higher education environment: Causes and solutions. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(2), 15–23.

3. Atrak, H. (2018). Intention Involvement in the Nature of Plagiarism. International Journal of Ethics and Society, 2(1), 1–7.

4. Starovoytova, D. (2017). Plagiarism under a Magnifying Glass. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 109–129.

5. Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for Plagiarism in Higher Education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33–45. doi: 10.1515/orga-2017-0002

6. Alvi, F., Stevenson, M., & Clough, P. (2021). Paraphrase type identification for plagiarism detection using contexts and word embeddings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00277-8

7. Shah, J. N., Shah, J., Baral, G., Baral, R., & Shah, J. (2022). Types of plagiarism and how to avoid misconduct: Pros and cons of plagiarism detection tools in research writing and publication. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 16(2), 3–18. doi: 10.3126/njog.v16i2.42085

8. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). Self-Plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 193–205. doi: 10.1007/s10805-009-9092-1

9. Thurman, R. H., Chervenak, F. A., McCullough, L. B., Halwani, S., & Farine, D. (2015). Self-plagiarism: a misnomer. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214(1), 91–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.004

10. Yeh, E. (2021). Intentional Plagiarism? Strategies for Teaching Language Learners Academic Integrity. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57(3), 132–137. doi: 10.1080/00228958.2021.1935506

11. Das, N. (2018). Intentional Or Unintentional, It Is Never Alright To Plagiarise: A Note On How Indian Universities Are Advised To Handle Plagiarism. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 9(1), 56. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_140_17

12. Vázquez-Recio, R., Calvo-García, G., López-Gil, M., Picazo-Gutiérrez, M., Ruiz-Bejarano, A. M., & Calvo-Gutiérrez, P. (2016). Conceptions And Causes Of Plagiarism Among University Students Of The Degree In Infant And Primary Education. INTED Proceedings, 1, 5705–5713. doi: 10.21125/inted.2016.0366

13. Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2016). Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of Language Studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240–258. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2016.1138864

14. Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074

15. Bethany, R. D. (2016). The Plagiarism polyconundrum. Journal of International Students, 6(4), 1045–1052. doi: 10.32674/jis.v6i4.334

16. Jereb, E., Perc, M., Lämmlein, B., Jerebic, J., Urh, M., Podbregar, I., & Šprajc, P. (2018). Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0202252. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202252

17. Alharbi, H. A. (2015). Improving students' English speaking proficiency in Saudi public schools. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 105–116. doi: 10.12973/iji.2015.818a

18. Kampa, R. K., Padhan, D. K., Karna, N., & Gouda, J. (2024). Identifying the factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: An evidence-based review of the literature. Accountability in Research, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2311212

19. UNSW (2023). Poor Time Management. UNSW Sydney Students. Retrieved from https://www.student.unsw.edu.au/poor-time-management

20. Abbasi, P., Yoosefi-Lebni, J., Jalali, A., Ziapour, A., & Nouri, P. (2020). Causes of the plagiarism: A grounded theory study. Nursing Ethics, 28(2), 282–296. doi: 10.1177/0969733020945753

21. Kammer, J., & Hays, L. (2023). Digital literacy made simple: Strategies for building skills across the curriculum. ISTE.

22. Popenici, S. a. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

23. Doró, K. (2014). Why do students plagiarise? EFL Undergraduates' views on the reasons behind plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 11(1), 255–263. doi: 10.2478/rjes-2014-0029

24. Engkizar, E., Alfurqan, A., Murniyetti, M., & Muliati, I. (2018). Behaviour and Factors Causing Plagiarism Among Undergraduate Students In Accomplishing the Coursework on Religion Education Subject. Khalifa Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 98. doi: 10.24036/kjie.v1i1.8

25. Pedro, A., Piedade, J., Matos, J. F., & Pedro, N. (2019). Redesigning initial teacher's education practices with learning scenarios. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 266–283. doi: 10.1108/ijilt-11-2018-0131

26. Fudge, A., Ulpen, T., Bilic, S., Picard, M., & Carter, C. (2022). Does an educative approach work? A reflective case study of how two Australian higher education-enabling programs support students and staff to uphold a responsible culture of academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1). doi: 10.1007/s40979-021-00099-1

27. Hadley, G., & Boon, A. (2022). Critical thinking. Taylor & Francis.

28. Wardani̇, D. K., Martono, T., Pratomo, L. C., Rusydi̇, D. S., & Kusuma, D. H. (2019). Online learning in higher education to encourage critical thinking skills in the 21st century. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 146–153. doi: 10.24331/ijere.517973

29. Ferguson, D. C., McNeil, L. K., Schaeffe, D. J., & Mills, E. M. (2017). Encouraging Critical Clinical Thinking (CCT) skills in First-Year Veterinary Students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 44(3), 531–541. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0216-032r1

30. AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, N. S., Jovic, N. M., & Lomidze, N. K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology. doi: 10.37965/jait.2023.0184

31. Turnitin (2025). Understanding the Similarity Score. Retrieved from https://guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/23435833938701-Understanding-the-similarity-score


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Ejuchegahi Anthony Angwaomaodoko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.