Policy Analysis of the Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan) from a Long-Term Investment Perspective for the Indonesian Government

Ilhamda El Zuhri

Abstract

Indonesia faces a significant challenge in addressing poverty, with over 26 million low-income families as of 2023. Poverty impedes economic progress and threatens social stability and the quality of life for many. The Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan/PKH), launched in 2007, provides cash transfers to improve access to essential services like education, health, and food security, showing positive impacts such as increased school attendance and reduced financial burdens. However, issues remain in the program's implementation, including inefficient data management and a lack of transparency, leading to misdirected assistance and limited reach. This paper explores E-Monitor: A Digital-Based Reporting Scheme for PKH Beneficiaries as a policy recommendation to enhance the PKH. E-Monitor aims to digitise beneficiary registration, cash transfer distribution, and monitoring, thereby increasing transparency, efficiency, and accessibility. Using an exploratory research design and investment analysis theory, this study evaluates E-Monitor's potential to improve the program's effectiveness and data management.

Additionally, this policy aligns with Indonesia's digital transformation agenda, promoting equitable access and streamlined administrative processes. Implementation considerations include pilot testing, community engagement, and data security. By addressing the PKH's existing limitations, E-Monitor represents a strategic long-term investment for poverty alleviation and sustainable development in Indonesia. This recommendation aims to inform policymakers of the benefits of digitalisation in social assistance programs, ultimately contributing to improved service delivery and poverty reduction outcomes.




Keywords


Family Hope Program (PKH); policy analysis; policy investment; economic development

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Musa, I., Magaji, S., Eke, C. I., & Yakeen, O. A.-M. (2022). Poverty and Its Intractability: Causes and Consequences. Inclusive Society and Sustainability Studies, 2(2), 48–58. doi: 10.31098/issues.v2i2.1218

2. Surajo, A. Z. (2016). Youth Unemployment and Poverty in Nigeria: A Threat to Sustainable Growth and Development. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management. doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v4i12.02

3. Sihotang, D., & Sihotang, M. M. (2022). Investigating the Transformative Impact of the Family Hope Program (PKH) on Basic Needs and Community Development in Pardomuan I Village, Pangururan District, Samosir Regency. Law and Economics, 16(1), 51–68. doi: 10.35335/laweco.v16i1.51

4. Rahayu, S. E., & Harahap, A. F. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of the Family Hope Program (PKH) Policy in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Economics, Social Science, Entrepreneurship and Technology, 1(1), 13–22. doi: 10.55983/ijeset.v1i1.23

5. Ministry of Social and Welfare. (2020). Book of Study Report on the Family Hope Program. Retrieved from https://kemensos.go.id/buku-laporan-studi-program-keluarga-harapan-pkh

6. Maizunati, N. A., & Sulistyaningrum, E. (2019). Impact Evaluation of Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): Indonesia conditional cash transfer program on iron supplements consumption on pregnant women in Indonesia. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2019). doi: 10.2991/icas-19.2019.8

7. Sobari, Suryapermana, N., & Muizuddin, Moch. (2022). Manajemen Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) dan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) Dalam Meningkatkan Layanan Pendidikan Dasar. Formosa Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 115–130. doi: 10.55927/fjss.v1i2.554

8. Rahmi,, & Ulfia. (2021). The Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH): For Poverty Reduction and Social Protection. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ulfia-Ulfia/publication/357603918_The_Program_Keluarga_Harapan_PKH_For_Poverty_Reduction_and_Social_Protection/links/64d59d2dd3e680065aacce13/The-Program-Keluarga-Harapan-PKH-For-Poverty-Reduction-and-Social-Protection.pdf

9. Solekhati, L. (2014). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan PKH (Program Keluarga Harapan) Studi Kasus Kebijakan PKH di Desa Tepus, Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta [Evaluation of PKH (Family Hope Programme) policy implementation Case Study of PKH Policy in Tepus Village, Gunung Kidul Regency, Yogyakarta] (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada) (in Indonesian).

10. Rosyid, M. I. (2023). Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Lebak [Implementation of the Family Hope Programme (PKH) for Community Welfare in Lebak Regency]. JDKP Jurnal Desentralisasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 4(1), 85-98 (in Indonesian).

11. Sendouw, R. H., Langkai, J. E., & Pangerapan, M. J. (2023). Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Di Kelurahan Luaan Kecamatan Tondano Timur [Implementation of the Family Hope Programme (PKH) in Luaan Village, East Tondano District]. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Kebijakan, 3(2). doi: 10.30596/japk.v3i2.17245

12. Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). The Investment Approach to Public Service Provision. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 136–144. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12250

13. Gronbach, L. (2023). Social cash transfers in sub-Saharan Africa: Financialization, digitisation and financial inclusion. Financializations of Development. Routledge.

14. Barron, P., Diprose, R., & Woolcock, M. (2011). Contesting Development: Participatory Projects and Local Conflict Dynamics in Indonesia. Yale University Press. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vkw76

15. Dima, E. T. Y., Pongge, M. I., & Timuneno, A. Y. W. (2024). Analysis Potential Problem In Pkh Program At Ntt Province Using Retrospective Approach. Jurnal Bisnis, Ekonomi, Dan Sains, 3(02), 510–525. doi: 10.33197/bes.vol3.iss02.2023.1975

16. Andreeva, O. V., Vovchenko, N. G., Galazova, S. S., Sukhoveeva, A. A., & Kravchenko, E. V. (2023). Benefits and Risks of Digitalization of Providing Social Services by the State. Anti-Crisis Approach to the Provision of the Environmental Sustainability of Economy, 143–152. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-2198-0_14

17. Mintrom, M., & Mintrom, M. (2012). Implementation Analysis. In M. Mintrom (Ed.), Contemporary policy analysis (pp. 285–304). New York: Oxford University Press.

18. Gusman, S. W. (2024). Development of the Indonesian Government’s Digital Transformation. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 5(5), 1128–1141. doi: 10.38035/dijemss.v5i5.2868

19. van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2022). Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101707. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101707

20. Sundberg, L. (2019, October). If digitalisation is the solution, what is the problem. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1366965/FULLTEXT01.pdf


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Ilhamda El Zuhri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.