Legal Implications of the Position of the Defendant Notary in a Law-suit to Cancel a Deed of Bequest as the Deed of Parties

Yustia Nerissa Arviana, Mohammad Hamidi Masykur, Imam Hamidi Sjafi'i

Abstract

This research discusses the legal implications of the notary's position as a defendant in a lawsuit to cancel a testamentary grant deed made by him as the deed of parties. Notaries are responsible for ensuring that every deed they make meets the quality and validity standards set by Law. The method used in this research is normative juridical research, which, in this case, can be done by examining various laws and regulations governing the role and responsibilities of notaries in making and cancelling testamentary grant deeds. In cancelling a testamentary grant deed, notaries can face various legal consequences, including administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions, if proven to have committed violations or negligence in making the deed. In addition, notaries are also responsible for storing and archiving deeds properly to ensure that they can be accessed for future legal purposes. This article also examines the legal protections that notaries can take to maintain the integrity of their profession and avoid potential lawsuits. By complying with legal procedures, ensuring the quality and validity of deeds, and implementing strict operational standards in storage and archiving, notaries can minimise legal risks and maintain public trust in their profession.

10.22178/pos.108-2


Keywords


Notary; Deed of Testamentary Grant; Deed Cancellation; Legal Implication; Legal Protection

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Harris, F., & Helena, L. (2017). Notaris Indonesia [Indonesian Notary]. Jakarta: Lintas Cetak Djaja (in Indonesian).

2. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris [Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 30 Year 2004 on the Office of Notary] Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Download/30494/UU%20Nomor%2030%20Tahun%202004.pdf (in Indonesian).

3. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris [Law of the Republic of Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Concerning the Amendment to Law No 30 of 2004 Concerning the Position of Notary]. Retrieved from https://www.kemhan.go.id/ppid/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/11/UU-2-Tahun-2014.pdf (in Indonesian).

4. Bujangga, I. K. W. A., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2022). Application Of The Liability Principle In The Land Sale As Joint Property Before A Notary. Policy Law Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(4), 9–16. doi: 10.55047/polri.v1i4.433

5. Wibowo, W. S., Najwan, J., & Bakar, F. A. (2022). Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris [Notary Integrity as an Authentic Deed Official in the Notary Law]. Recital Review, 4(2), 323–352. doi: 10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861 (in Indonesian).

6. Girsang, W. F. E., Kurniawan, K., & Haq, L. M. H. (2024). Legal Validity Of Notarial Deeds Signed With Electronic Signature. Policy Law Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(1), 156–172. doi: 10.55047/polri.v3i1.927

7. Praptaningrum, D. (2024). Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Hibah Atas Tanah Yang Belum Bersertifikat [Role and Responsibility of Notary in Making Deed of Grant Agreement on Uncertified Land] (thesis; University Islam Sultan Agung) (in Indonesian).

8. Dewi, I. A. K. (2022). Pergeseran Makna Panai’ Berlandaskan Gaya Hidup Di Desa Carrebbu Dusun Bentenge Kecamatan Awangpone Kabupaten Bone Sulawesi Selatan [Shifting Meanings of Panai' Based on Lifestyle in Carrebbu Village Bentenge Hamlet Awangpone Sub-district Bone Regency South Sulawesi]. Jurnal Ar-Risalah, 2(1), 55–65 (in Indonesian).

9. Yurahman, P. Z. (2023). Kedudukan Akta Hibah Wasiat Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Harta Bersama (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 2979 K/Pdt/2019) [The Position of Testamentary Grant Deed Made by Notary in View of the Perspective of Joint Assets (Study of Supreme Court Decision No 2979 K/Pdt/2019)] (thesis; Universitas Andalas) (in Indonesian).

10. Prastuti, M. T. M. (2006). Peran dan Tanggungjawab Notaris Atas Akta Wasiat (Testament Acte) Yang Dibuat Dihadapannya [The Role and Responsibility of a Notary Over a Testament Acte Made Before Him] (thesis; Universitas Diponegoro) (in Indonesian).

11. Hardianti, A. S. (2018). Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Memutus Pembatalan Akta Hibah (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 78 PK/AG/2013) [The Authority of the Religious Court in Deciding the Cancellation of Grant Deed (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Number: 78 PK/AG/2013)]. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 46(1), 69. doi: 10.14710/mmh.46.1.2017.69-79 (in Indonesian).

12. Almuntazar, M. A., Manfarisyah, M., & Hamdani, H. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Dan Pembatalan Akta Hibah Tanah Nomor 590.4/23/2007 Menurut Hukum Perdata Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam [Juridical Analysis of Granting and Cancellation of Deed of Land Grant Number 590.4/23/2007 According to Civil Law and Compilation of Islamic Law]. Suloh Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 7(2), 14. doi: 10.29103/sjp.v7i2.2032 (in Indonesian).

13. Maria, J. (2020). Pembatalan Akta Notariil Oleh Notaris [Cancellation Of Notarial Deed By Notary Public]. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 4(4). doi: 10.58258/jisip.v4i4.1547 (in Indonesian).

14. Herawati, N. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris/Ppat Dalam Pembuatan Akta Hibah Wasiat [Responsibility of Notary/Pat in Making Deed of Testamentary Grant] (thesis; Universitas Islam Sultan Agung) (in Indonesian).

15. Hendra, R. (2013). Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Mempergunakan Identitas Palsu Di Kota Pekanbaru [Notary's Responsibility Towards Authentic Deed with False Identity in Pekanbaru City]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1). doi: 10.30652/jih.v3i01.1029 (in Indonesian).

16. Suryadini, Y., & Widiyanti, A. T. (2020). Akibat Hukum Hibah Wasiat yang Melebihi Legitime Portie [Legal Effects of Testamentary Grants that Exceed the Legitime Portie]. Media Iuris, 3(2), 241. doi: 10.20473/mi.v3i2.18774 (in Indonesian).

17. Afriana, A. (2020). Kedudukan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pihak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia Terkait Akta Yang Dibuatnya [The Position and Responsibility of Notary as a Party in the Settlement of Civil Disputes in Indonesia Related to the Deed He Made]. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(2), 246–261. doi: 10.23920/jphp.v1i2.250 (in Indonesian).

18. Harahap, W. A., Nurdin, A., & Santoso, B. (2020). Kompetensi Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Syariah (Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah) [Competence of Notary in Making Sharia Agreement (Review from the Perspective of Sharia Economic Law)]. Notarius, 13(1), 170–180. doi: 10.14710/nts.v13i1.29171 (in Indonesian).

19. Nurmawati, B., Fahlevie, R. A., Herman, K., Suparman, M., & Lusia, A. (2023). Keabsahan Akta Notaris yang Menggunakan Cyber Notary dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris [The Validity of Notarial Deeds Using Cyber Notary in Making Authentic Deeds According to the Notary Law]. Action Research Literate, 7(9), 35–41. doi: 10.46799/arl.v7i9.160 (in Indonesian).

20. Reynaldi, M. R., & Adjie, H. (2023). Peran Notaris Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Meminimalisir Sengketa Tanah [The Role of Notary Deed Makers in Minimising Land Disputes]. Jurnal Hukum, 20(2) (in Indonesian).

21. Moechthar, O. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta [Fundamentals of Deed Making Techniques]. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press (in Indonesian).

22. Wibowo, U. R. (2020). Apa Wujud Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Akta Otentik Terdegradasi Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan [What is the Notary's Responsibility as a Result of an Authentic Deed Degraded into an Underhand Deed]. Humani, 10(1), 62–82. doi: 10.26623/humani.v10i1.1802 (in Indonesian).

23. Meutia, F. (2022). Pembatalan Akta Hibah Wasiat Dan Akibatnya Terhadap Pembagian Waris (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 2665 K/PDT/2019) [Cancellation of Testamentary Grant Deed and Its Impact on the Division of Inheritance (Study of Supreme Court Decision No 2665 K/PDT/2019)]. Indonesian Notary, 4(2), 19 (in Indonesian).

24. Pandawa, G. C., Sumbu, T., & Kapugu, B. A. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Pada Undang-Undang No 11 Tahun 2019 Tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Apabila Melakukan Pelanggaran Atas Ketentuan Hukum [Application of Administrative Sanctions in Law No 11 of 2019 concerning the National System of Science and Technology for Violations of Legal Provisions]. Lex privatum, 13(2), 1–9 (in Indonesian).

25. Nurlete, M. (2020). Tanggung J Anggung Jawab Notaris Terh Aris Terhadap Akta Palsu Berdasarkan Pel Asarkan Pelanggaran Jenis Norm Anggaran Jenis Norma Dan Sanksin An Sanksinya. (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang No 244/PID.B/PN.TJK) [Liability of Notary Terh Aris for False Deed Based on Violation of Types of Norms and Sanctions. (Case Study of Tanjung Karang District Court Decision No 244/PID.B/PN.TJK)]. Indonesian Notary, 2(18) (in Indonesian).

26. Enggarwati, I. D. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Diperiksa Oleh Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Keterangan Palsu Pada Akta Otentik [Criminal Liability and Legal Protection for Notaries Investigated by Investigators in the Crime of False Statement in Authentic Deed]. Brawijaya Law Student Journal (in Indonesian).

27. Flora, H. S. (2012). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti dalam Pembuatan Akta [Responsibility of Substitute Notary in Deed Making]. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 57(14), 179–199 (in Indonesian).

28. Putra, G. I., Hasanah, S., & Jiwantara, F. A. (2023). Penguatan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris dalam Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris [Strengthening the Authority of the Regional Supervisory Council of Notaries in the Guidance and Supervision of Notaries]. Indonesia Berdaya, 4(2), 679–688. doi: 10.47679/ib.2023475 (in Indonesian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Yustia Nerissa Arviana, Mohammad Hamidi Masykur, Imam Rahmad Sjafi'i

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.