Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal

This study delves into the complex world of sustainable energy development, seeking to distil the essence of this multifaceted concept. We uncover the key aspects and activities that underpin sustainable energy development through a meticulous and systematic review of existing literature. Our research journey begins with analysing publication trends and tracing the chronological trajectory of scholarly output on sustainable energy development. We identify the most influential articles in the field based on citation frequency and map the global research landscape, pinpointing the top contributing countries.

Next, we explore the dominant subject areas and disciplines intertwined with sustainable energy development and provide a comprehensive overview of the diverse definitions and interpretations surrounding this concept. Our study highlights the pivotal activities and initiatives driving sustainable energy development. Ultimately, our research reveals that achieving sustainable energy development hinges on three critical actions: transitioning to renewable energy sources, boosting energy efficiency, and mitigating greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions. Notably, our findings underscore the need for a unified definition of sustainable energy development, highlighting the need for further research and clarity in this field.

SED; Energy Efficiency; Renewable Energy; Greenhouse gas emission; Low carbon economy

1. Łukasiewicz, K., Pietrzak, P., Kraciuk, J., Kacperska, E., & Cieciora, M. (2022). Sustainable Energy Development—A Systematic Literature Review. Energies, 15(21), 8284. doi: 10.3390/en15218284

2. Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2011). Energy Economics. Springer London. doi: 10.1007/978-0-85729-268-1

3. Tutak, M., Brodny, J., Siwiec, D., Ulewicz, R., & Bindzár, P. (2020). Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential. Energies, 13(24), 6643. doi: 10.3390/en13246643

4. Žičkienė, A., Morkunas, M., Volkov, A., Balezentis, T., Streimikiene, D., & Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I. (2022). Sustainable Energy Development and Climate Change Mitigation at the Local Level through the Lens of Renewable Energy: Evidence from Lithuanian Case Study. Energies, 15(3), 980. doi: 10.3390/en15030980

5. Afgan, N. H., Gobaisi, D. A., Carvalho, M. G., & Cumo, M. (1998). Sustainable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2(3), 235–286. doi: 10.1016/s1364-0321(98)00002-1

6. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf

7. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, & The World Bank. (2019). Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2019. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2019_Tracking_SDG7_Report.pdf

8. Moustakas, K., Loizidou, M., Rehan, M., & Nizami, A. S. (2020). A review of recent developments in renewable and sustainable energy systems: Key challenges and future perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109418. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109418

9. Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (1999). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Applied Energy, 64(1–4), 427–440. doi: 10.1016/s0306-2619(99)00111-7

10. IAEA. (2005). Energyindicators for Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Retrieved from https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/publications/pdf/pub1222_web.pdf

11. United Nations. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3-14 June 1992. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/rio1992

12. United Nations. (1992). 19th Special Session of the General Assembly to Review and Appraise
the Implementation of Agenda 21, 23-27 June 1997, New York. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/newyork1997

13. Vinuales, J. E. (2018, December). Sustainable Development in International Law. Retrieved from https://www.ceenrg.landecon.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/wp20.pdf

14. World Bank. (1992). World Development Report 1992. Development and the Environment. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/995041468323374213/pdf/105170REPLACEMENT0WDR01992.pdf

15. Solidar. (n. d.). Sustainable development and international cooperation. Retrieved from https://www.solidar.org/policy-areas/sustainable-development-and-international-cooperation/

16. Watkins, G. C. (1992). The Hotelling Principle: Autobahn or Cul de Sac? The Energy Journal, 13(1), 1–24. doi: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol13-no1-1

17. European Commission. (2013). Green paper: A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0169:FIN:en:PDF

18. United Nations. (N. d.). The Paris Climate Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement

19. Subbaraman, R., Tripkovic, D., Chang, K.-C., Strmcnik, D., Paulikas, A. P., Hirunsit, P., Chan, M., Greeley, J., Stamenkovic, V., & Markovic, N. M. (2012). Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni,Co,Fe,Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nature Materials, 11(6), 550–557. doi: 10.1038/nmat3313

20. Demirbas, M. F., Balat, M., & Balat, H. (2009). Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Conversion and Management, 50(7), 1746–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.013

21. Yabuuchi, N., Takeuchi, M., Nakayama, M., Shiiba, H., Ogawa, M., Nakayama, K., Ohta, T., Endo, D., Ozaki, T., Inamasu, T., Sato, K., & Komaba, S. (2015). High-capacity electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries: Li3NbO4 - based system with cation-disordered rocksalt structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(25), 7650–7655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504901112

22. Vera, I., & Langlois, L. (2007). Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy, 32(6), 875–882. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.006

23. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2007). A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 62(2), 291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.020

24. Meyer, N. I. (2003). European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets. Energy Policy, 31(7), 665–676. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00151-9

25. Kajikawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: Toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(6), 771–782. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.005

26. Al-Mansour, F., & Zuwala, J. (2010). An evaluation of biomass co-firing in Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(5), 620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.004

27. Gao, S., Chen, Y., Fan, H., Wei, X., Hu, C., Luo, H., & Qu, L. (2014). Large scale production of biomass-derived N-doped porous carbon spheres for oxygen reduction and supercapacitors. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2(10), 3317. doi: 10.1039/c3ta14281g

28. Szabó, S., Bódis, K., Huld, T., & Moner-Girona, M. (2011). Energy solutions in rural Africa: mapping electrification costs of distributed solar and diesel generation versus grid extension. Environmental Research Letters, 6(3), 034002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034002

29. Saha, P. C. (2003). Sustainable energy development: a challenge for Asia and the Pacific region in the 21st century. Energy Policy, 31(11), 1051–1059. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00214-8

30. Balat, H. (2007). Green Power for a Sustainable Future. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 25(1), 1–25.

31. Hurtado, O., & Hunte, C. (2007). Educating engineers in sustainable energy development: An interdisciplinary approach. International Journal Engineering Education, 23, 266–275.

32. Grigoroudis, E., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Phillis, Y. A. (2013). A Fuzzy Paradigm for the Sustainability Evaluation of Energy Systems. Assessment and Simulation Tools for Sustainable Energy Systems, 205–224. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5143-2_10

33. Streimikiene, D., & Mikalauskiene, A. (2016). Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Energy Development in the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Slovakia. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(2), 31–41. doi: 10.7441/joc.2016.02.03

34. Tiep, L. T., Huan, N. Q., & Hong, T. T. T. (2021). Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility In Sustainable Energy Development In Emerging Economy. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 172–186. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.10774

35. Ligus, M., & Peternek, P. (2021). The Sustainable Energy Development Index—An Application for European Union Member States. Energies, 14(4), 1117. doi: 10.3390/en14041117

36. Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2021). Assessing sustainable energy development in the central and eastern European countries and analyzing its diversity. Science of The Total Environment, 801, 149745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149745

37. Kudełko, M., & Wejer, M. (2014). Selected implications of negative externalities – on the example of the Polish energy sector. Managerial Economics, 15(2), 189. doi: 10.7494/manage.2014.15.2.189

38. Knez, S., Šimić, G., Milovanović, A., Starikova, S., & Županič, F. Ž. (2022). Prices of conventional and renewable energy as determinants of sustainable and secure energy development: regression model analysis. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12(1). doi: 10.1186/s13705-022-00333-9

39. Tamoor, M., Abu Bakar Tahir, M., Zaka, M. A., & Iqtidar, E. (2022). Photovoltaic distributed generation integrated electrical distribution system for development of sustainable energy using reliability assessment indices and levelized cost of electricity. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 41(4). doi: 10.1002/ep.13815

40. Wang, G., Chao, Y., & Chen, Z. (2021). Promoting developments of hydrogen powered vehicle and solar PV hydrogen production in China: A study based on evolutionary game theory method. Energy, 237, 121649. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121649

41. Elkadeem, M. R., Younes, A., Mazzeo, D., Jurasz, J., Elia Campana, P., Sharshir, S. W., & Alaam, M. A. (2022). Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment. Applied Energy, 322, 119532. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119532

42. Wu, Y., Ghalkhani, M., Ashrafzadeh Afshar, E., Karimi, F., Xia, C., Le, Q. V., & Vasseghian, Y. (2022). Recent progress in Biomass-derived nanoelectrocatalysts for the sustainable energy development. Fuel, 323, 124349. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124349

43. Majchrzak, M., Szczypa, P., & Adamowicz, K. (2022). Supply of Wood Biomass in Poland in Terms of Extraordinary Threat and Energy Transition. Energies, 15(15), 5381. doi: 10.3390/en15155381

44. Zhang, J., Xu, J., & Tao, F. (2021). Interface Modification of TiO2 Nanotubes by Biomass-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots for Enhanced Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 4(11), 13120–13131. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02760

45. Sari, A. I., Suwarto, Suminah, & Purnomo, S. H. (2022). Community Participation in Utilizing Livestock Waste Biogas to Support Sustainable Energy Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(3), 841–848. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.170314

46. Wang, X., Tu, C., Yang, W., Guo, Q., Hou, Y., & Xiao, F. (2021). Operation Control Strategy of Multi-Energy DC Micro-Grid Considering Complementary Inertia of Gas and Battery. IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. doi: 10.1109/iecon48115.2021.9589332

47. Li, M., Gu, Y., Chang, Y., Gu, X., Tian, J., Wu, X., & Feng, L. (2021). Iron doped cobalt fluoride derived from CoFe layered double hydroxide for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 425, 130686. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130686

48. Almeida, R. M., Fleischmann, A. S., Brêda, J. P. F., Cardoso, D. S., Angarita, H., Collischonn, W., Forsberg, B., García-Villacorta, R., Hamilton, S. K., Hannam, P. M., Paiva, R., Poff, N. L., Sethi, S. A., Shi, Q., Gomes, C. P., & Flecker, A. S. (2021). Climate change may impair electricity generation and economic viability of future Amazon hydropower. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102383. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102383