Validity of the Instrument for the Critical Analysis Ability of Prospective Biology Teacher
Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of an instrument designed to measure the critical analysis skills of prospective biology teacher students. Content validity was calculated using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI), which involved five biology education experts. Of the nine items tested, seven were declared valid with a CVR value 1.0, while the other two were declared invalid. The empirical validity and reliability of the instrument were tested on 60 students using SPSS 23. The results of the empirical validity test showed that all items were valid with a Pearson Correlation value greater than r-table (0.254). The instrument's reliability was also good, with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.714. The research results show that this instrument is valid and reliable for measuring the critical analysis skills of prospective biology teacher students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Asy’ari, M., & Fitriani, H. (2017). Literatur Reviu Keterampilan Proses Sains sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi [Literature Review of Science Process Skills as the Basis for Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills]. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 5(1), 1. doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v5i1.1114 (in Indonesian).
2. Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: The Logic of Methods (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.
3. Ennis, R. (2011). Critical Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19. doi: 10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
4. Seventika, S. Y., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Mariani, S. (2018). Critical thinking analysis based on Facione (2015) – Angelo (1995) logical mathematics material of vocational high school (VHS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012067. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012067
5. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards. doi: 10.5771/9781538133934
6. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/7-%20How%20to%20Assess%20Higher-Order%20Thinking%20Skills%20in%20Your%20Classroom%20-%20Copy%201.pdf
7. Fitriani, H., Asy'ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Exploring the Prospective Teachers' Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis Skills. (2019). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3). doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19434
8. Afriansyah, E. A., Herman, T., Turmudi, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Mendesain Soal Berbasis Masalah untuk Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Calon Guru [Designing Problem-Based Problems for Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills of Prospective Teachers]. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 239–250. doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.649 (in Indonesian).
9. Chaidir, D. M. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Bantuan Diagram Vee terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi [The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model with the Help of Vee Diagram on Critical Thinking Ability of Biology Teacher Candidate Students]. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 10(2), 41. doi: 10.25134/quagga.v10i2.1324 (in Indonesian).
10. Suroto, S., Prakoso, B. B., Ridwan, M., & Juniarisca, D. L. (2021). Berpikir kritis dan hubungannya dengan prestasi akademik calon guru pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan Kesehatan [Critical thinking and its relationship with academic achievement of prospective physical education sport and health teachers]. Jurnal Olahraga Pendidikan Indonesia (JOPI), 1(1), 46–59. doi: 10.54284/jopi.v1i1.5
11. Malik, M. S., & Priyadi, M. S. (2021). Analysis Of Instrument Validity Assessment Items For Student Learning Achievement. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika: Media Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 21(2), 127. doi: 10.22373/jid.v21i2.6702
12. La Vega, M. D., Baez-Lopez, Y., Limon-Romero, J., Tlapa, D., Flores, D.-L., Borbon, M. I. R., & Maldonado-Macias, A. A. (2020). Lean Manufacturing Critical Success Factors for the Transportation Equipment Manufacturing Industry in Mexico. IEEE Access, 8, 168534–168545. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3023633
13. Widiatmo, T., Jufri, A. W., & Jamaluddin, J. (2019). Analysis of Validation of Instruments to Measure Student's Critical Thinking Ability and Science Literation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 212–218. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.272
14. Kassab, S. E. H., Fida, M., & Ahmed, A. A. (2014). Constructs Emerging from Students' Scores Using Five Assessment Instruments at the End of Pre-Clerkship Phase in a PBL Curriculum. Education in Medicine Journal, 6(4). doi: 10.5959/eimj.v6i4.271
15. Masoudifar, Z., Khanali Mojen, L., Rassouli, M., Nasiri, M., Patterson, P., Mc Donald, F., & Eshghi, P. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Sibling Cancer Needs Instrument (SCNI). Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 19(12), 3457–3462. doi: 10.31557/apjcp.2018.19.12.3457
16. Rahmi, Y. L., & Hayati, M. (2022). The instruments for measuring students' self-efficacy in biology learning: Validity and reliability. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 6(02), 139–147. doi: 10.33503/ebio.v6i02.1364
17. Yuan, S.-P., Liao, H.-C., Wang, Y., & Chou, M.-J. (2014). Development of a Scale to Measure the Critical Thinking Disposition of Medical Care Professionals. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 303–311. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.303
18. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. doi: 10.1177/0748175613513808
19. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, D., Leiva-Santos, J. P., Sánchez-Hernández, R., Hernández-Marrero, D., & Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2016). Spanish modified version of the palliative care outcome scale–symptoms renal: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. BMC Nephrology, 17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0402-8
20. Rismaulhijjah, W., & Kuswanti, N. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Harian Hasil Pengembangan Guru Materi Sistem Gerak Manusia Kelas XI IPA [Item Analysis of Teacher-Developed Daily Test Questions on Human Movement System Class XI IPA]. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 11(3), 643–661. doi: 10.26740/bioedu.v11n3.p643-661 (in Indonesian).
21. Mulyadi, R., & Mulianti, M. (2018). Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Vokasi: Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Indikator [Competence of Vocational Education Graduates: Indicator Validity and Reliability Analysis]. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 18(1), 49–58. doi: 10.24036/invotek.v18i1.240 (in Indonesian).
22. Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2018). Validitas Instrumen Karakterisasi Kemampuan Metakognisi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika [Validity of Instrument for Characterising Metacognition Ability of Physics Teacher Candidates]. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(1), 18. doi: 10.33394/j-ps.v6i1.955 (in Indonesian).
23. Pratiwi, RA, & Rahmi, A. (2023). The Impact of Full Day School on Student Learning Concentration at SMAN 4 Pariaman. JKPPK. doi: 10.59031/jkppk.v1i1.66
24. Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif Dalam Perspektif Bimbingan Dan Konseling [Qualitative Descriptive Research Methods in Guidance and Counselling Perspective]. QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Pendidikan, 2(2), 83–91. doi: 10.22460/q.v2i2p83-91.1641 (in Indonesian).
25. Abdollahi, A., & Allen, K. A. (2021). Psychometric Assessment of the Persian Translated Version of the Romantic Perfectionism Scale Among Couples. Psychological Reports, 125(6), 3224–3237. doi: 10.1177/00332941211036026
26. Şenel, S., & Topuzkanamış, E. (2018). Görme Yetersizliği Olan Öğrencilerin Dinleme Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesi [Determination of Listening Strategies of Students with Visual Impairment]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(4), 699–722. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.397642 (in Turkish).
27. Septenia, E., Maryani, M., & Prastowo, S. H. B. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Kontekstual Berbantuan Quiz Kahoot untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa [Development of Contextual Based Assessment Instrument Assisted by Quiz Kahoot to Measure Students' Critical Thinking Ability]. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 10(2), 176–186. doi: 10.24252/jpf.v10i2.30274 (in Indonesian).
28. Setyaputri, N. Y., Krisphianti, Y. D., & Nawantara, R. D. (2020). Skala Pengukuran Karakter Adil: Salah Satu Instrumen sebagai Piranti BADRANAYA (Board-game Karakter Konselor Multibudaya) [Fair Character Measurement Scale: One Instrument as a Tool for BADRANAYA (Multicultural Counsellor Character Board-game)]. Efektor, 7(1), 90–97. doi: 10.29407/e.v7i1.14463
29. Maciel, M. E. D., & Vargas, D. de. (2020). Criterion validity of the Key Question for screening at-risk alcohol use in primary healthcare. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP, 54. doi: 10.1590/s1980-220x2018032503553
30. Arikunto, S. (2017). Development of research instruments and program assessment. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
31. Samosir, T. I., & Salayan, M. (2023). Pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 4(1), 1–12. doi: 10.34007/jdm.v4i1.1621
32. Kafami, Z., Farhoudi, F., Alimoradi, M., Sangsefidi, Z., Delshad, N., & Khadem-Rezaiyan, M. (2022). Persian translation and validation of community attitudes toward the mentally ill scale: a tool for assessing social stigma about mental illness. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. doi: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000419
33. Larasanty, L. P. F., Jaya, M. K. A., Astuti, K. W., & Santika, I. W. M. (2021). Pengembangan Kuisioner Udayana untuk Penilaian Kepuasan Pasien terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian oleh Apoteker di Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat [Development of the Udayana Questionnaire for Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with Pharmaceutical Services by Pharmacists at Community Health Centres]. Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice, 11(1), 62. doi: 10.22146/jmpf.60998 (in Indonesian).
34. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
35. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Herdiyana Fitriani, Ni Ketut Rapi, Ida Bagus Putu Arnyana, Putu Budi Adnyana, Desak Made Citrawathi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Email the author