Transforming Education in Indonesia: The Impact and Challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum

Hunaepi Hunaepi, I Gusti Putu Suharta

Abstract

The "Merdeka Belajar" initiative, introduced by Indonesia's Ministry of Education, represents a significant shift towards a student-centred learning approach. This manuscript aims to analyse the development, implementation, and outcomes of the Merdeka Belajar curriculum. The objectives are to evaluate the curriculum's impact on fostering critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills among students and to identify the challenges faced during its implementation. The methodology involves a comprehensive literature review and content analysis, drawing on existing research and policy documents to provide a detailed overview of the curriculum's principles and pedagogical foundations. The results indicate that the Merdeka Belajar curriculum has positively influenced students' engagement and learning outcomes by promoting autonomy and integrating 21st-century skills. However, significant challenges persist, including logistical issues, teacher preparedness, and digital resource disparities. The findings suggest that while the curriculum has made strides in transforming Indonesian education, further efforts are needed to address these challenges. Recommendations include enhancing teacher training programs, improving infrastructure to support digital learning, and fostering greater collaboration between educational stakeholders. By addressing these areas, the Merdeka Belajar curriculum can more effectively achieve its goal of preparing students for the demands of the modern world.


10.22178/pos.105-31


Keywords


Mardeka Belajar; Educational Transformation; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Fajri, T. A. A., & Andarwulan, T. (2023). Implementation Of The Merdeka Curriculum In Indonesia: Challenges And Opportunities. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 10(2).

2. Mulyadin, T., Muhammad Khoiron, Dion Ginanto, & Kristian Adi Putra. (2023). Workshop on Kurikulum Merdeka (Freedom Curriculum): Dismantling Theories and Practices. BEMAS: Jurnal Bermasyarakat, 3(2), 126–132. doi: 10.37373/bemas.v3i2.265

3. Utami, Y. P., & Suswanto, B. (2022). The Educational Curriculum Reform in Indonesia: Supporting “Independent Learning Independent Campus (MBKM).” SHS Web of Conferences, 149, 01041. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202214901041

4. Efendi, Moch. Y., & Hsi, N. L. (2020). The Comparison of Elementary Curriculum Education between Indonesia and Singapore. Journal Of Teaching And Learning In Elementary Education (Jtlee), 3(1), 22. doi: 10.33578/jtlee.v3i1.7323

5. Anisa Sari, G. M., Antika, V. Y., Wisutama, R. A., Syiami, L. N., Sulaeman, N. F., Nuryadin, A., & Subagiyo, L. (2022). New Indonesian Science Curriculum for Junior High School: A Content Analysis to Support STEM SDGs. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(2), 176–182. doi: 10.30872/jlpf.v3i2.1555

6. Shpeizer, R. (2019). Towards a Successful Integration of Project-based Learning in Higher Education: Challenges, Technologies and Methods of Implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1765–1771. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070815

7. Mohd Basar, Z., Mansor, A. N., Jamaludin, K. A., & Alias, B. S. (2021). The Effectiveness and Challenges of Online Learning for Secondary School Students – A Case Study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119. doi: 10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514

8. Ebardo, R., & Wibowo, S. (2021). I Work to Learn: The Lived Experiences of Working Students in Online Learning during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356194963_I_Work_to_Learn_The_Lived_Experiences_of_Working_Students_in_Online_Learning_during_COVID-19

9. Husni Rahiem, M. D. (2021). Indonesian University Students’ Likes and Dislikes about Emergency Remote Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 1. doi: 10.24191/ajue.v17i1.11525

10. Alhayat, A., & Arifin, Z. (2023). Evaluation of Science curriculum: A literature study. Inovasi Kurikulum, 20(2), 239–250. doi: 10.17509/jik.v20i2.58887

11. Arlinwibowo, J., Retnawati, H., & Kartowagiran, B. (2021). How to Integrate STEM Education in The Indonesian Curriculum? A Systematic Review. Challenges of Science. doi: 10.31643/2021.03

12. Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Djuhartono, T., Ramdayana, I. P., & Desnaranti, L. (2021). Improvement of teacher’s professional competency in strengthening learning methods to maximize curriculum implementation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 720. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21010

13. Andriyanto, O. D., Darni, D., Utami, R. R., Ulfatin, N., Bagus, A., Tuwoso, T., & Rochmawati, R. (2023). Revitalizing Local Language Curriculum and Its Implementation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 1497–1504. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-008-4_161

14. Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, S., Sumarti, S. S., & Kadarwati, S. (2021). Indigenous knowledge of Indonesian traditional medicines in science teaching and learning using a science–technology–engineering–mathematics (STEM) approach. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(2), 467–510. doi: 10.1007/s11422-021-10067-3

15. Kabanda, M. N. (2021). Globalization and Curriculum in the 21st Century: A Case for Flexible and Dynamic Curriculum. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 18–29. doi: 10.34256/ajir2132

16. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326084

17. Mat Dangi, M. R., Mohamed Saat, M., & Saad, S. (2022). Teaching and learning using 21st century educational technology in accounting education: Evidence and conceptualisation of usage behaviour. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19–38. doi: 10.14742/ajet.6630

18. Fink, A. (2024). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

19. Caulley, D. (2007). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper [Book Review]. Qualitative Research Journal, 7(2), 103–104. doi: 10.3316/qrj0702103

20. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. N. d.: SAGE.

21. White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0053

22. Abduh, A., & Rosmaladewi, R. (2019). Language policy, identity, and bilingual education in Indonesia: a historical overview. XLinguae, 12(1), 219–227. doi: 10.18355/xl.2019.12.01.17

23. Berg, E., & Lepp, M. (2023). The meaning and application of student-centered learning in nursing education: An integrative review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 69, 103622. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103622

24. Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered Approach in Teaching and Learning: What Does It Really Mean? Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72–83. doi: 10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

25. Rizaldi, D. R., Nurhayati, E., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). The Correlation of Digital Literation and STEM Integration to Improve Indonesian Students’ Skills in 21st Century. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 73–80. doi: 10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36

26. Widayana, G. (2023). The influence of technical skills and 21st century skills on the job readiness of vocational students. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Vocational Education and Technology, IConVET 2022, 6 October 2022, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia. doi: 10.4108/eai.6-10-2022.2327433

27. Kodrat, D. (2021). Industrial Mindset of Education in Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Policy [Industrial Mindset of Education in Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Policy]. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, 4(1), 9–14. doi: 10.47076/jkpis.v4i1.60 (in Indonesian).

28. Prakoso, B. H., Ramdani, Z., & Rahmah, B. (2021). Teacher’s Perception on Merdeka Belajar Policy. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 3(2). doi: 10.26499/ijea.v3i2.84

29. Kamran Akhtar Siddiqui, Shahid Hussain Mughal, Imran Ali Soomro, & Masood Ahmed Dool. (2021). Teacher Training in Pakistan: Overview of Challenges and their Suggested Solutions. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(2), 215–223. doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v2i2.91

30. Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: perspectives from the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 197–209. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.515024

31. Taylor, M. W. (2013). Replacing the ‘teacher-proof’ curriculum with the ‘curriculum-proof’ teacher: Toward more effective interactions with mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2012.710253

32. Hidayat, S. E., Samidi, S., & Nasution, A. (2021). The Alignment And Misalignment Of The Islamic Economics Curriculum With The Indonesian Government Policy. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 10(1), 61. doi: 10.22373/share.v10i1.9394

33. Khaeroni, K., & Sabri, S. (2022). Implementation of Independent Learning-Independent Campus at the Department Level of Islamic Religious Higher Education. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(02), 213–226. doi: 10.32678/tarbawi.v8i02.6864

34. Aliyyah, R. R., Rasmitadila, Gunadi, G., Sutisnawati, A., & Febriantina, S. (2023). Perceptions of elementary school teachers towards the implementation of the independent curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(2), 154–164. doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v10i2.4490

35. Ward, H., & Hockey, J. (2007). Engaging the learner: Embedding information literacy skills into a biotechnology degree. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(5), 374–380. doi: 10.1002/bmb.79

36. Salakhova, V. B., Erofeeva, M. A., Pronina, E. V., Belyakova, N. V., Zaitseva, N., & Ishmuradova, I. I. (2021). State regulation and development of digital educational platforms. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(4), 956–966. doi: 10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6282

37. Raffo, C. (2009). Interrogating poverty, social exclusion and New Labour’s programme of priority educational policies in England. Critical Studies in Education, 50(1), 65–78. doi: 10.1080/17508480802526660

38. Diyasa, I. G. S. M., Putra, I. N. D. P., Mandenni, N. M. I. M., Mahendra A, M. R., & A, R. L. (2023). Implementation of Innovation in Integrated Evaluation and Learning System using Outcome-Based Education Ecosystem. IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 6(1), 78–83. doi: 10.29138/ijebd.v6i1.2079

39. Syeed, M. M., Shihavuddin, A., Uddin, M. F., Hasan, M., & Khan, R. H. (2022). Outcome Based Education (OBE): Defining the Process and Practice for Engineering Education. IEEE Access, 10, 119170–119192. doi: 10.1109/access.2022.3219477

40. Norawati, R., & Puspitasari, Y. (2022). The Learning Skills of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Student-Teachers in Project-based Learning and Case-based Learning. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 9(2), 255–277. doi: 10.30762/jeels.v9i2.512

41. Novita, M., Kusumaningsih, W., Setia Wardana, Y., Kumar Behera, S., . M., & Iskandar, F. (2022). Advancing Indonesian Education through the Three Penggerak Programs. KnE Social Sciences. doi: 10.18502/kss.v7i19.12462

42. Ehren, M., & Baxter, J. (2020). Trust, Accountability and Capacity in Education System Reform (M. Ehren & J. Baxter, Eds.). Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429344855

43. Little, A. W. (2010). International and comparative education: what’s in a name? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(6), 845–852. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2010.523264

44. Alashwal, M. (2020). Design Thinking in STEM Education: A Review. International Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 18. doi: 10.5430/irhe.v5n1p18

45. Althubaiti, A., Tirksstani, J. M., Alsehaibany, A. A., Aljedani, R. S., Mutairii, A. M., & Alghamdi, N. A. (2022). Digital transformation in medical education: Factors that influence readiness. Health Informatics Journal, 28(1), 146045822210755. doi: 10.1177/14604582221075554

46. Lungu, G. F. (1985). Elites, Incrementalism and Educational Policy‐making in Post‐independence Zambia. Comparative Education, 21(3), 287–296. doi: 10.1080/0305006850210306

47. Reimers, F. M. (2020). Thinking Multidimensionally About Ambitious Educational Change. Audacious Education Purposes, 1–46. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_1

48. Yuan, H., Kunaviktikul, W., Klunklin, A., & Williams, B. A. (2008). Improvement of nursing students’ critical thinking skills through problem‐based learning in the People’s Republic of China: A quasi‐experimental study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 10(1), 70–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00373.x

49. Zeng, F. (2019). The Cultivation of Student’s Critical Thinking Skills Based on English Reading Contest: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2019). doi: 10.2991/icsshe-19.2019.250

50. Stedman, N., & Brown, A. (2020). Critical thinking perspectives of undergraduate students: How they think about climate change impacts on global food security and hunger. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 1(1), 14–24. doi: 10.37433/aad.v1i1.29

51. de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331–353. doi: 10.1080/13603110903030089

52. Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development: A Systemic Framework for Connecting the SDGs to Educational Outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104. doi: 10.3390/su11216104

53. Jarvis, J., & Mthiyane, N. (2022). Using empathetic-reflective-dialogical re-storying as a teaching-learning strategy to confront xenophobic attitudes in a context of higher education. Journal of Education, 88, 1–20. doi: 10.17159/2520-9868/i88a07

54. Medina-García, M., Doña-Toledo, L., & Higueras-Rodríguez, L. (2020). Equal Opportunities in an Inclusive and Sustainable Education System: An Explanatory Model. Sustainability, 12(11), 4626. doi: 10.3390/su12114626

55. Galkiene, A. (2021). Values Supporting The Sustainability Of Inclusive Education In Different Practices. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 192–202. doi: 10.17770/sie2021vol2.6422

56. Pegalajar Palomino, M. (2022). Implications of Mobile Learning for Sustainable Inclusive Education: A Systematic Review. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 538–553. doi: 10.34190/ejel.20.5.2612

57. Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1348/000709906x156881

58. Muktiyo, W. (2016). Marketing Strategy and the Potency of Inclusive Education Throughout Surakarta Ex-Residency. Komunitas, 8(1), 13–21. doi: 10.15294/komunitas.v8i1.5211


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Hunaepi, I Gusti Putu Suharta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.