Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal

Psycholinguistics appeared at the interface of two «oldest» sciences—psychology and linguistics — and became one of the main linguistic sciences in a relatively short period. The need for scientific knowledge of the nature of human mental intellectual activity determined the emergence of this new science. As part of the synchronous study of language in the twentieth century, many original concepts were put forward based on a psychological understanding of the nature of the object of linguistics.

The theoretical significance of the work is that, for the first time, it describes in detail the concepts of A. Marty and K. Buehler in terms of influence on the formation of modern psycholinguistics. The works of the German linguist Anton Marti, who is devoted to the problem of the emergence of language, are considered. In his scientific works, Anton Marti calls language «any sign of mental processes». Thus, an analysis of the development of psycholinguistic thought is made. Also, a vision of the main problems of modern psycholinguistics associated with language use in speech communication and individual speech-thinking activity is proposed.

The article reveals the scientific prerequisites and the main trends in the development of modern psycholinguistics, its methods, current problems, and achievements – a description of the mechanisms of speech, linguistic personality, etc. and shows the methodological foundations and historical continuity of the teachings of linguists. The works of A. Marti, K. Buhler, etc., are consecrated in terms of the significance of their views for today's understanding of the same scientific problems.

psycholinguistics; origins of German psycholinguistics; actual problems of psycholinguistics; A. Marty; K. Buehler

1. Arsentyeva, E., & Arsentyeva, Y. (2017). Rasshirennaja metafora kak odin iz tipov okkazional'nogo ispol'zovanija frazeologizmov-jevfemizmov: jeksperimental'noe issledovanie (Extended metaphor as one of the types of occasional use of phraseological units-euphemisms). Vestnik tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 50, 5–16 (in Russian).

2. Beljanin, V. (2003). Psiholingvistika [Psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Flinta (in Russian).

3. Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer (in German).

4. Buhler, K. (1993). The Theory of the Language. N. d.

5. Carroll, J. (1953). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

6. Chernova, D., Sljusar', N., Prokopenja, V., Petrova, T., & Chernigovskaja, T. (2016). Jeksperimental'nye issledovanija grammatiki: sintaksicheskij analiz neodnoznachnyh predlozhenij [Experimental studies of grammar: syntactic analysis of ambiguous sentences]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 6, 36–50. (in Russian).

7. Cynk, S. (2013). Leksicheskie okkazionalizmy (imena sushhestvitel'nye) v proizvedenii A. I. Solzhenicyna “Dvesti let vmeste”. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija “Russkaja filologija”, 1, 5–10 (in Russian).

8. Chynk S. V. (2015). O nekotoryh leksicheskih okkazionalizmah istoricheskogo ocherka A. I. Solzhenicyna «Dvesti let vmeste» [On Some Lexical Occasionalisms of A.I. Solzhenitsyn's Historical Essay "Two hundred years together"]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija “Russkaja filologija”, 2, 35–39 (in Russian).

9. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (50th ed.). N. d.: The MIT Press.

10. Fedorova, O. (2020). Russian psycholinguistics: Yesterday, today, tomorrow (subjective notes on the study of mechanisms of language production and comprehension). Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 6, 105. doi: 10.31857/0373-658x.2020.6.105-129

11. Frumkina, R. (2001). Psiholingvistika [Psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Akademija (in Russian).

12. Humboldt, V. (1984). Izbrannye trudy po jazykoznaniju [Selected works of general linguistics]. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

13. Zhinkin, N. (1958). Mehanizmy rechi [Speech mechanisms]. Moscow: Akademija pedagogicheskih nauk (in Russian).

14. Kabanovskaya, Y. (2020). Izuchenie verbal'nyh associacij v psiholingvistike [Study of verbal associatives in psycholinguistics]. Science symbol, 5, 139-140 (in Russian).

15. Kovshikov, V., & Gluhov, V. (2007). Psiholingvistika. Teorija rechevoj dejatel'nosti [Psycholinguistics. Theory of speech activity]. Moscow: ACT (in Russian).

16. Kuz'mina, M. (2010). Podhody k issledovaniju diskursa [Approaches to discourse research]. Nauchnaja perspektiva, 7, 5 (in Russian).

17. Gijom, G. (1992). Principy teoreticheskoj lingvistiki [The principles of theoretical linguistics]. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

18. Golub', A., & Ivanov, M. (2020). Jeksperimental'nye metody psiholingvisticheskogo analiza. In Psihologija lichnosti: aktual'nye issledovanija. Magnitogorsk: MGTU (in Russian).

19. Gorelov I., Sedov, K. (2001). Osnovy psiholingvistiki [The basic course of psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Labirint (in Russian).

20. Lebedeva, N. (2017). Opyt tipologizacii orfograficheskih lichnostej na osnove jeksperimenta «Tri diktanta s vizual'nym izucheniem teksta» [Experience of typologisation of orthographic personalities based on the experiment "Three dictations with visual text study"]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologija, 45, 116-125 (in Russian).

21. Leont'ev, A. (2003). Osnovy psiholingvistiki [Basics of psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Smysl (in Russian).

22. Marty A. (2021). Ob otnoshenii grammatiki i logiki [On the relationship between grammar and logic]. Logos, 1(41) (in Russian).

23. Marty, A. (1908). Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/untersuchungenzu01martuoft

24. Miller, J. (1968). Psikholinqvisti [Psiholingvisty]. In Teoriya rechevoy deyatelnosti (in Russian).

25. Osgood, C. E. (1963). Psycholinguistics. In Psychology: A Study of a Science. Study II. Empirical Substructure and Relations with Other Sciences. Volume 6. Investigations of Man as Socius: Their Place in Psychology and the Social Sciences (pp., 244–316). doi: 10.1037/10590-005

26. Ostgorf, G., & Brugman, K. (1964). Morfologicheskie issledovanija v oblasti indoevropejskih jazykov [Morphological research in the field of Indo-European languages] (in Russian).

27. Paul, Q. (1960). Principy istorii jazyka [Principles of language history]. Moscow: izdatel'stvo inostrannoj literatury (in Russian).

28. Popov, S. (2019). Associativnyj jeksperiment kak osnova formirovanija principov otbora leksicheskogo materiala [Associative experiment as a basis for forming the principles of selecting lexical material]. In Lingvistika i lingvodidaktika v svete sovremennyh nauchnyh paradigm. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov (pp. 315–323).Irkutsk (in Russian).

29. Rezanova, Z., & Miklashevskij, A. (2016). Modelirovanie obrazno-perceptivnogo komponenta jazykovoj semantiki pri pomoshhi psiholingvisticheskoj bazy dannyh [Modelling the image-perceptual component of linguistic semantics using a psycholinguistic database]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologija, 5(43) (in Russian).

30. Rezanova, Z., & Ershova, E. (2017). Vlijanie grammaticheskogo roda na konceptualizaciju ob#ektov (jeksperimental'noe issledovanie) [The influence of grammatical genus on object conceptualisation (an experimental study)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologija, 50, 104-124 (in Russian).

31. Saharnyj, L. (1989). Vvedenie v psiholingvistiku [Introduction to Psycholinguistics]. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta (in Russian).

32. Sherbakova, M. (2020). Vosprijatie pis'mennogo vyskazyvanija v psiholingvisticheskom aspekte [Perception of a written statement in the psycholinguistic aspect]. Sciences of Europe, 47, 38–40 (in Russian).

33. Suprun, A. (1996). Lekcii po teorii rechevoj dejatel'nosti [Lectures on the theory of speech activity]. N. d.: Belorusskij fond Sorosa (in Russian).

34. Veysalli, F. (2010). Semiotika [Semiotics]. Studia Philologica, 4, 338 (in Azerbaijani).

35. Jakovlev, A. (2019). Jazykovoe soznanie - chast' individual'nogo soznanija ili chast' teorii? [Is linguistic consciousness part of individual consciousness or part of theory?] Voprosy psiholingvistiki, 4, 69-73 (in Russian).

36. Zimnjaja, I. (2001). Lingvopsihologija rechevoj dejatel'nosti [Linguopsychology of speech activity]. Moscow: Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institut (in Russian).

37. Cynk, S. (2016). Izuchenie jazykovoj lichnosti A. I. Solzhenicyna kak avtora nauchno-publicisticheskogo teksta [Study of A.I. Solzhenitsyn's linguistic personality as an author of a scientific-publicistic text] (in Russian).