The Implementation of Cancellation of Land Title Certificates Due to Administrative Defects After the Enactment of Government Regulation No 18 of 2021: A Case Study of the Land Office in Malang Regency
Abstract
The research examines the implementation of the cancellation of land certificates due to administrative defects by the National Land Agency (BPN) in Malang Regency following the enactment of Government Regulation No 18 of 2021. Researchers adopted a socio-legal approach with a juridical-anthropological perspective to investigate human behaviour within the cultural context, particularly in the legal realm. Researchers collected primary data through interviews with the Head of the Section for Control and Resolution of Disputes at the Land Office of Malang Regency. Secondary data, including legal regulations, documents, literature, and online sources, were obtained through a literature review. The study reveals that the annulment process is categorized into light, moderate, and severe cases based on complexity. Challenges include determining parties acting in bad faith, lacking technical guidance for evidence collection, and lacking a timeframe for dispute resolution, resulting in inefficiencies. The BPN of Malang Regency received minimal cancellation requests, reflecting low public awareness. Efforts to address these challenges involve classifying cases appropriately, recommending cancellations to the Regional Office, and enhancing public awareness through awareness campaigns. The study concludes that while the BPN follows prescribed procedures, improvements in defining good faith, establishing clear evidence collection guidelines, and implementing timeframes for dispute resolution are essential for more efficient and just handling of certificate cancellations.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Sutedi, A. (2023). Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah [Land Title Certificate]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika (in Indonesian).
2. Miru, A. (2011). Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen di Indonesia [Principles of Consumer Legal Protection in Indonesia]. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada (in Indonesian).
3. Dominikus, R. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum [Legal Philosophy Seeking: Understanding and Making Sense of Law]. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo (in Indonesian).
4. Wirawan, V., Silviana, A., & Widowaty, Y. (2022). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Mafia Tanah [Political Reconstruction of the Land Registration System as an Effort to Prevent the Land Mafia]. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 13(2), 185–207 (in Indonesian).
5. Harsono, B. (2003). Hukum Agraria Indonesia [Indonesian Agrarian Law]. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan (in Indonesian).
6. Indrawan, L. N., Arba, N., & Munandar, A. (2021). Juridicial Review Implementation Of Land Registration According To Government Regulation No 18 Of 2021 Concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units, And Land Registration. Policy Law Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 39–56. doi: 10.55047/polri.v1i1.27
7. Yuris, R. F., & Sudiro, A. (2023). Responsibility Of The Head Of The National Land Agency For The Issuance Of Land Ownership Certificates With Administrative Legal Defects. Policy Law Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 2(4), 437–445. doi: 10.55047/polri.v2i4.911
8. Marbun, S. F. (2015). Peradilan Administrasi Negara Dan Upaya Administratif Di Indonesia [State Administrative Courts and Administrative Remedies in Indonesia]. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press (in Indonesian).
9. Malangkab. (2019). Profil Malang. Retrieved from https://malangkab.go.id/Berita/index/misi-kabupaten-malang (in Indonesian)
10. Wijaya, T. (2022). Rawan Konflik, 800 Ribu Bidang Tanah di Kabupaten Malang Belum Bersertifikat [Prone to Conflict, 800,000 Parcels of Land in Malang Regency are Uncertified]. Jawa Pos, Radar Malang. Retrieved from https://radarmalang.jawapos.com/malang-raya/811082117/rawan-konflik-800-ribu-bidang-tanah-di-kabupaten-malang-belum-bersertifikat (in Indonesian).
11. Alfons, A., & Mujiburohman, D. A. (2021). Penerbitan Dan Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Karena Cacat Administrasi [Issuance and cancellation of land title certificates due to administrative defects]. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 277. doi: 10.30652/jih.v10i2.8095 (in Indonesian).
12. Saleh, A. A. (2022). Analysis Yuridis Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Akibat Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah (Studi Putusan No. 08/PDT. G/2020/PN. PSW) [Juridical Analysis of the Cancellation of Land Ownership Certificates as a Result of Land Rights Ownership Disputes (Study of Decision No. 08/PDT. G/2020/PN. PSW)] (Thesis; Semarang: Universitas Islam Sultan Agung) (in Indonesian).
13. Farhah, N. (2022). Cacat Administrasi Pada Sertifikat Tanah Akibat Jual Beli Fiktif:(Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Cianjur) [Administrative Defects in Land Certificates Due to Fictitious Sale and Purchase: (Study at the Land Office of Cianjur Regency)] (Thesis; Universitas YARSI (in Indonesian).
14. Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hokum [Normative Legal Research Methodology in Justifying Legal Theory]. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
15. Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2019). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris [Dualism of Legal Research: Normative & Empirical]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar (in Indonesian).
16. Patajai, S. M. (2019). Nilai Pembuktian Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah [Evidentiary Value of Land Rights Certificates]. Al-Ishlah, 22(1), 32–44 (in Indonesian).
17. Hamidi, J. (2011). Hermeneutika Hukum: Sejarah Filsafat dan Metode Tafsir [Legal Hermeneutics: A History of Philosophy and Methods of Interpretation]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Brawijaya Press (in Indonesian).
18. Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar [An introduction to the law]. Maha Karya Pustaka (in Indonesian).
19. Tanuwidjaja, A., & Hoesin, S. H. (2022). Responsibility Of Notaries In The Inclusion Of The Names Of Instrumentary Witnesses Who Were Not Present At The Signing Of Authentic Deeds (Study Of The Decision Of The Rantau Prapat District Court Number 26/Pdt.G/2020/PN RAP). Legal Brief, 11(4), 2304–2314.
20. Wangean, B. H. (2018). Pembatalan Ratusan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanaholehkantor Wilayahbadan Pertanahan Nasionaljawa Barat (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggitata Usaha Negarajakarta No 296/B/2013/Pt.Tun.Jktjo. Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandung No 11/G/2013/Ptun.Bdg) [Cancellation of Hundreds of Land Rights Certificates by the Regional Office of the National Land Agency of West Java (Analysis of the Decision of the High Administrative Court of Jakarta No. 296/B/2013/Pt.Tun.Jktjo. Decision of Bandung State Administrative Court No 11/G/2013/Ptun.Bdg)]. Jurnal Legal Reasoning, 1(1), 1–13 (in Indonesian).
21. Santoso, U. (2015). Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah [Acquisition of Land Rights]. Jakarta: Prenada Media (in Indonesian).
22. Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar (Edisi Revisi) [Law Discovery: An Introduction (Revised Edition)]. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka (in Indonesian).
23. Santoso, U. (2017). Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehenshif [Agrarian Law: A Comprehensive Study]. Jakarta: Prenada Media (in Indonesian).
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Wiranto, Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto, Herlindah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



