Trademark Dispute: Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No 161K/PDT.SUS.HKI/2023

Ahmad Janu Kurniawan, Zainal Asikin, Abdul Atsar

Abstract

The advancement of science has resulted in human intellectual capabilities to create various works, whether in the form of technological innovations, art, or literature. The dispute between the trademarks MS GLOW and PS GLOW did not conclude in commercial court. Instead, it reached the cassation level with decision No 161k/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2023. This research aims to explain the substance of cassation decision No 161k/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2023 and analyze the considerations made by the cassation judges in that verdict. The study used a normative legal research method utilized legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials encompass primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The analysis technique involved prescriptive analysis, which was then interconnected in such a way as to create coherent and systematic writing. Subsequently, the legal materials were classified and interconnected deductively, allowing for conclusions to be drawn from the core issues formulated. The results of this study explain that the cassation judges, in deciding this case, have disregarded the principles of justice and legal certainty. Additionally, the researcher found errors by the cassation judges in providing legal considerations in this decision.

10.22178/pos.104-13


Keywords


trademark dispute; cassation decision; Legal Certainty

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Arto, M. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama [Civil Case Practice in Religious Courts] (Vol. 5). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar (in Indonesian).

2. Atsar, A. (2018). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual [A Closer Look at Intellectual Property Law]. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama (in Indonesian).

3. Krisnawati, A. (2004). Perlindungan Hukum Varietas Baru Tanaman : Dalam Perspektif Hak Paten Dan Hak Pemulia [Legal Protection of New Varieties of Plants: From the Perspective of Patent Rights and Breeders' Rights]. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada (in Indonesian).

4. Mulyadi, L. (2007). Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Teori, Praktek, Teknik Penyusunan dan Permasalannya [Judges' Decisions in Criminal Procedure, Theory, Practice, Drafting Techniques and Issues]. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti (in Indonesian).

5. Rahardjo, S. (2011). Ilmu Hukum [Legal Science]. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti (in Indonesian).

6. Mahardika, Y. A. P., & Nurhayati, I. (2019). Analisis Permohonan Pendaftaran Merek Secara Internasional Bagi UMKM Setelah Diterbitkan Peraturan Presiden No. 92 Tahun 2017 Tentang Ratifikasi Protokol Madrid [Analysis of International Trademark Registration Application for MSMEs After the Issuance of Presidential Regulation No. 92 Year 2017 on Ratification of the Madrid Protocol]. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 2(2), 1–13. doi: 10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss2.art1 (in Indonesian).

7. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 [Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945]. Retrieved from https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/regulation/pdf/UUD45%20ASLI.pdf (in Indonesian).

8. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis [Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications]. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37595/uu-no-20-tahun-2016 (in Indonesian).

9. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata [Code of Civil Procedure]. Retrieved from https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/kitab-undang-undang-hukum-perdata/detail (in Indonesian).

10. Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 161 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023 [Supreme Court Decision Number 161 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023]. Retrieved from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaedb29475bb0f9884f0313633373031.html (in Indonesian).

11. Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Sby [District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Sby]. Retrieved from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaed04440333bd8e81ed323034323437.html (in Indonesian).

12. Putusan PN MEDAN Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn [MEDAN District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn]. Retrieved from https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaecebadefa5e296a914313334383032.html (in Indonesian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Janu Kurniawan, Zainal Asikin, Abdul Atsar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.