In the Beginning: Chinese Cosmogonic Myths and Taoist Philosophy

Tetiana Danylova

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse the Chinese cosmogonic myths, cosmogony, and cosmology elaborated by the ancient Chinese philosophers, particularly the representatives of Taoism. Chinese cosmogony and cosmology are most fully represented in philosophical texts, not mythological narratives. Chinese thinkers elaborated on the complex scheme of the emergence and development of the world. The source of the world's origin is not a transcendent external force. Just the opposite, this source is immanent and is based on the principle of constant changes. Chinese philosophers understood the universe as a continuous interaction of complementary forces. The interaction of complementary forces is the path of changes, i.e., the constant creation of the world and the flow of life processes. With special attention given to the Chinese Hundun myth and chaos-hundun concept, the author analyses "Tao Te Ching", "Zhuangzi", "Huaninanzi", and "Taijitu shuo".

10.22178/pos.100-19


Keywords


Hundun; Cosmos; Wu Chi; Tai Chi; Tao; Heaven; Earth; Yin; Yang; Qi

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Bodde, D. (1981). Essays on Chinese Civilisation. N. d.: Princeton University Press.

2. Danylova, T. (2014). Born out of Nothingness: a Few Words on Taoism. Research Revolution. International Journal of Social Science & Management, 3(1), 1–6.

3. Danylova, T. (2014). The World without Fear and Illusions: Meditation as a Means of Overcoming Binary Oppositions of Culture. International Researchers, 3(2), 79–82.

4. Danylova, T. V. (2023). Philosophy and Intercultural Communication: The Phenomenon of a Human Being in the Confucian Tradition. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 23, 146–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283637

5. Eliade, M. (1967). Cosmogonic Myth and “Sacred History”. Religious Studies, 2(2), 171–183.

6. Girardot, N. J. (1976). The Problem of Creation Mythology in the Study of Chinese Religion. History of Religions, 15(4), 289–318.

7. Goldin, P. R. (2008). The myth that China has no creation myth. Monumenta Serica, 56, 1–22.

8. Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (1987). Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.

9. Lin, P. (2020). A Translation of Lao-tzu’s Tao Te Ching and Wang Pi’s Commentary. U Of M Center For Chinese Studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.19935

10. Lushetich, N. (n. d). The Future of Indeterminacy. Datification, Memory, Bio-Politics. Hundun. Retrieved from https://indeterminacy.ac.uk/blog/hundun

11. Maslov, A. A. (2005). Tajnyj smysl i razgadka kodov Lao-czy [The secret meaning and deciphering the codes of Lao Tzu]. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix (in Russian).

12. Britannica. (n. d.). Pan Gu. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pan-Gu

13. Wellcome Collection. (n. d.). Pan-Gu, the primordial giant of Chinese myth, holding the symbol of yin and yang. Woodcut, 1850/1900 (?). Retrieved from https://wellcomecollection.org/works/a4vd4muq

14. Shchutskii, I. (1997). Kitajskaja klassicheskaja “Kniga peremen” [Chinese classic I Ching] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Eastern Literature (in Russian).

15. An, L., & Huainan. (2010). The Huainanzi: a guide to the theory and practice of government in Early Han China. New York: Columbia University Press.

16. Thompson, J. (n. d.). Zhou Dunyi (Chou Tun-I, 1017-1073). Retrieved from https://iep.utm.edu/zhou-dun

17. Torchinov, E. (1993). Daosizm. Opyt istoriko-religiovedcheskogo opisanija [Daoism. An essay on historical and religious description]. Saint-Petersburg: Andreev i synov'ja (in Russian).

18. Torchinov, E. (2007). Puti filosofii Vostoka i Zapada: poznanie zapredel'nogo [The ways of the Eastern and Western philosophy: knowledge of the transcendent]. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika (in Russian).

19. Watson, B. (Trans.). (2013). The Complete Works of Zhuangzi. Retrieved from https://terebess.hu/english/tao/Zhuangzi-Burton-Watson.pdf.

20. Wen, H. (2010). One and many: creativity in whitehead and Chinese cosmology. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 37(1), 102–115. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2009.01567.x

21. Wu, X. (2001). The Rhinoceros Totem and Pangu Myth: An Exploration of the Archetype of Pangu. Oral Tradition, 16(2), 364-380.

22. Yao, W. (2011, October 20). Pangu and Ancient China. Retrieved from http://scholar.valpo.edu/core_reader/13

23. Zhou, D. (2009). Explanation of the Supreme Polarity Diagram (Taijitu shuo). Retrieved from https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/TJTS-Zhu.pdf


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Tetiana Danylova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.