The Effectiveness of Deed Making Through Video Conferences in the Digital Age
Abstract
This research aims to analyse the influence of the digital era on civil law evidentiary procedures and the evidentiary power of deeds presented through video conferencing in civil case trials. This normative legal research uses a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The study found that first, the digital era has encouraged the increase in electronic transactions among the public and provides benefits and benefits with the convenience of conducting electronic transactions, where the strong influence of the digital era has a significant impact on changing the forms that were previously only known as written documents and then turning into electronic documents that can also be used and submitted as evidence in court, especially considering the rapid and massive development and progress of the digital era, of course, it also encourages the urgency of doing notarial deeds through Video Conference. Second, the evidentiary power of deeds presented through video conferences in the trial of civil cases based on positive law in Indonesia is not recognised as electronic evidence. So that notarial deeds other than the exception of Article 77 § 1 of the Company Law, which states that the holding of GMS can also use video conferencing or other electronic media facilities, the rest must remain subject to and comply with the enactment of the UUJN which requires that the authenticity of the making of a Notarial Deed must be in front of a Notary with direct physical presence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Adjie, H. (2018). Konsep Notaris Mayantara Menghadapi Tantangan Persaingan Global [The Concept of Notary Mayantara Faces the Challenges of Global Competition]. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 16(2), 201–218. doi: 10.31849/respublica.v16i2.1436 (in Indonesian).
2. BENNY. (2015). Penerapan Konsep Cyber Notary Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 [Implementation of the Concept of Cyber Notary in Indonesia in Review of Law Number 2 Year 2014]. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/14050-ID-penerapan-konsep-cyber-notary-di-indonesia-ditinjau-dari-undang-undang-nomor-2-t.pdf (in Indonesian).
3. Soerjono, S., & Sri, M. (1985). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat [Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview]. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada (in Indonesian).
4. Amiruddin., & Zainal, A. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum [Introduction to Legal Research Methods]. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers (in Indonesian).
5. Johnny, I. (2005). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif [Normative Legal Research Theory & Methodology]. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing (in Indonesian).
6. Hadikusumah, H. (2004). Pengantar Antropologi Hukum [Introduction to Legal Anthropology]. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti (in Indonesian).
7. Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum [Legal Research Methods]. Mataram: Mataram University Press (in Indonesian).
8. Supandi. (2019). Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 untuk mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia [Modernisation of State Administrative Courts in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 to encourage the Advancement of Indonesian Legal Civilisation]. Semarang : UNDIP Press (in Indonesian).
9. Sudarsono. (2019). Legal Issues Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Reformasi Hukum Acara dan Peradilan Elektronik [Legal Issues in State Administrative Courts Post-Reform Procedural Law and Electronic Courts]. Jakarta: Kencana (in Indonesian).
10. Sudikno, M. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya (in Indonesian).
11. Muhammad, N. (2012). Pemeriksaan Alat Bukti Digital Dalam Proses Pembuktian [Examination of Digital Evidence in the Evidentiary Process]. Seminar tentang Digital Forensik (in Indonesian).
12. Santhos, W. (2016). Penggunaan Informasi Elektronik Dan Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Persidangan [Use of Electronic Information and Electronic Documents as Trial Evidence]. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1), 1. doi: 10.25216/jhp.5.1.2016.1-18 (in Indonesian).
13. Yahanan, A., Febrian., & Rahim, R. (2017). The Protection Of Consumer Rights For Aviation Safety and Security In Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Sriwijaya Law Review, 1(1).
14. Merlyania, D., Yahanana, A., & Trisakab, A. (2020). Kewajiban Pembacaan Akta Otentik Oleh Notaris Di Hadapan Penghadap Dengan Konsep Cyber Notary [Obligation to Read the Authentic Deed by Notary in the Presence of the Presenter with the Concept of Cyber Notary]. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(1), 36–47 (in Indonesian).
15. Satjipto, R. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif [Dissecting Progressive Law]. Jakarta: Kompas (in Indonesian).
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ida Susi Rachmawati, Salim, Zunnuraeni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



