An appraisal on the Role of Technology in Modern Education, Opportunities and Challenges

Ejuchegahi Anthony Angwaomaodoko

Abstract

The influence of technology in modern education is a transformative force that has changed the learning and teaching process in contemporary education. This study investigates several aspects of the impact of technology on education, with emphasis on both the opportunities and challenges it presents. Technology's benefits in education have shown that accessibility and diversity in education have risen in rapid technological growth due to digital resources and personalised learning possibilities. The implication showcases that technology would better enhance an inclusive education that accommodates diverse learners and ensures interactive learning, bearing in mind the global connectivity of technology. Despite technology's immense possibilities and benefits in modern education, it should be managed appropriately to avoid challenges such as privacy and security concerns and ethical and societal considerations. There is a need for strategic planning, strong policies, and professional development to ensure the closing of digital gaps within education to exploit the potential of technology while tackling its related issues.




Keywords


Technology; Modern; Education; Learning; Students

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/32815106/_Use_of_Technology_in_English_Language_Teaching_and_Learning_An_Analysis

2. Brill, J. M., & Galloway, C. (2006). Perils and promises: University instructors' integration of technology in classroom‐based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 95–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00601.x

3. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-kr/Should+Robots+Replace+Teachers%3F%3A+AI+and+the+Future+of+Education-p-9781509528967

4. Zhao, Y. (2018). What Works May Hurt: Side Effects in Education. N. d.: Teachers College Press.

5. Chen, F., & Cui, Y. (2020). Utilising Student Time Series Behaviour in Learning Management Systems for Early Prediction of Course Performance. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 1–17. doi: 10.18608/jla.2020.72.1

6. Aristovnik, A. (2012). The Impact of ICT on Educational Performance and its Efficiency In Selected EU and OECD Countries: A Non-Parametric Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2187482

7. Tinio, V. (2002). ICT in Education. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/524544

8. Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital Technologies in Education 4.0. Does it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning? A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(04), 31. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20291

9. Machado, L. J., & Chung, C.-J. (2015). Integrating Technology: The Principals' Role and Effect. International Education Studies, 8(5). doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n5p43

10. Sandars, J., Homer, M., Pell, G., & Croker, T. (2008). Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Medical Teacher, 30(3), 308–312. doi: 10.1080/01421590701798729

11. Luo, L. (2010). Web 2.0 Integration in Information Literacy Instruction: An Overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.11.004

12. Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6(1). doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41

13. Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, S33–S35. doi: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3is1.165

14. Aisami, R. S. (2020). Utilising a 5-Stage Learning Model for Planning and Teaching Online Courses. In Advances in Mobile and Distance Learning. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2042-0

15. Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0

16. Corrin, L., & de Barba, P. (2015). How do students interpret feedback delivered via dashboards? Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. doi: 10.1145/2723576.2723662

17. Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2013). Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. doi: 10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2

18. Wise, A. F. (2014). Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. doi: 10.1145/2567574.2567588

19. Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330636

20. Sianou-Kyrgiou, E., & Tsiplakides, I. (2011). Digital Divide: Students' Use of the Internet and Emerging Forms of Social Inequalities. Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education, 55–68. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_5

21. Fisher, C., Dwyer, D.C., & Yocam, K. (Eds.). (1996). Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22. Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., Niiya, M., Cotten, S., & Farkas, G. (2014). Balancing the One-To-One Equation: Equity and Access in Three Laptop Programs. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(1), 46–62. doi: 10.1080/10665684.2014.866871

23. Gray, L., Thomas, N., Lewis, L. (2010, May). Teachers' Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf

24. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

25. YUMPU. (2008). Technology in Schools: The Ongoing Challenge of Access. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/3156258/technology-in-schools-the-ongoing-challenge-of-access-nea

26. Albert, C. O. (2014). Constraints to Effective Use of ICT among Extension Professionals and Farmers in Extension Delivery in Rivers State, Nigeria. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 2(11), 136–142.

27. Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3). doi: 10.12973/ejmste/75275

28. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373–398. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013

29. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(2), 277–302.

30. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.

31. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. doi: 10.1007/bf02299597

32. Brodie, C., Karat, C.-M., Karat, J., & Feng, J. (2005). Usable security and privacy. Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security - SOUPS '05. doi: 10.1145/1073001.1073005

33. BCCampus. (n. d.). Teaching In a Digital Age. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/chapter/9-9-the-sections-model-speed-and-security/

34. Schoonenboom, J., Sligte, H., & Kliphuis, E. (2009). Guidelines for supporting re-use of existing digital learning materials and methods in higher education. ALT-J, 17(2), 131–141. doi: 10.1080/09687760903033074

35. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 12–24. doi: 10.18261/issn1891-943x-2006-01-03

36. Pangrazio, L. (2014). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2014.942836

37. Byun, J. F., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: Ameta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(34), 113–136.

38. Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., Wilson, A., & Razak, A. (2016). A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 102, 202–223. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.001

39. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

40. Mora, C. E., Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual Technologies Trends in Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2). doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00626a


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Ejuchegahi Anthony Angwaomaodoko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.