The Issue of Hybridization of Discursive Practices
Abstract
The discourse research, which was reduced to analysing such linguistic problems as the text and the conditions of its generation, gradually gave way to analysing discourse as a social phenomenon. In the 90s of the last century, the status of discourse analysis was determined as an interdisciplinary science. In all fundamental research, the central theme is the concept of discourse as a derivative of social practice and its connection with the social structure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow: Kultura (in Russian).
2. Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2). London: Sage Publications.
4. Fetzer, A. (2013). The multilayered and multifaceted nature of political discourse. In The pragmatics of political discourse. Explorations across cultures (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, 3, 41–58.
6. Galperin, I. (1981). Tekst kak ob'ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
7. Habibova, K. (2019). Sociolinguistics analysis of political communication. Zakarpatski filolohichni studii, 8(1), 149-154.
8. Habibova, K. (2023). Virtual discourse as a communicative requirement of the modern era. Ad Alta. Journal of Interdisciplinary research, 13 (1), 173-176.
9. Lotman, Y. (1970). Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta [The structure of a literary text]. Moscow: Iskusstvo (In Russian).
10. Mammadov, A. (2014). Deictic Representations of Person in Media Discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 10(2). doi: 10.1515/lpp-2014-0013
11. Schiffrin, D. (1985). Everyday Argument: Organisation of Diversity in Talk. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 3, 35-46.
12. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (2003). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Cornwall. London: Blackwell Publishing.
13. Talbot, M. (2007). Media discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
14. Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004). Approaches to Media Texts. In The Sage Handbook of Media Studies (pp. 105–122). London: Sage.
15. Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Zaychikova, N. (2003). Politicheskij tekst-politicheskij diskurs-politicheskij roman [Political text - political discourse - political novel]. In Polifonija obrazovanija i anglistika v mul'tikul'turnom mire (25-26, November, pp. 55–56). MSLU: Moscow (in Russian).
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ramila Farman kyzy Huseynova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Email the author