The Dilemma of Balancing between Benefits and Risks: Desert Locust Management Best Practices

Abstract

While desert locusts threaten human security, management practices can also introduce unintended risks, thus leading to a normative dilemma. Therefore, this study sought to determine desert locust management techniques that protect human security from pests and its management practices in Kenya. The analysis used a mixed methods approach using ex-post facto evaluation and cross-sectional survey designs. The target population included desert locust-affected persons. A multi-stage sampling approach using stratified and purposive random sampling techniques was used to target a sample size of 900 respondents drawn from 30 counties affected by desert locusts. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data was analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics using frequencies, percentages and ordinal logistic regression. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis and incorporated in the discussion. The findings revealed that there were several possible desert locust management best practices. The study concludes that the Integrated pest management (IPM) approach presents an opportunity to build resilience against human resource, technical and financial challenges through the progressive use of readily available knowledge and skills during physical control before advancing to more sophisticated strategies such as biological and chemical control options. The study recommends that scholars, policymakers and practitioners develop a customised IPM strategy for Kenya.