Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Going Concern Likelihood of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

John Jandiya, Gbegi Daniel Orsa, Saidu Adamu

Abstract

Going concern describes the company's ability to maintain its business continuity. The auditor can issue a going concern audit opinion if the company's condition is doubtful in its business continuity. Based on this premise, this study investigated the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the going concern likelihood of Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in Nigeria. The study used an ex post facto research design. The secondary data source was collected from the published annual financial reports of the studied DMBs in Nigeria. The study covered fifteen  DMBs in Nigeria, ranging from 2013 to 2021. The data collected were analysed using logistic regression analysis using STATA software. Findings from the research show that board financial expertise and independence negatively and significantly affect the likelihood of DMBs in Nigeria. The study also indicates audit firms' size positively affects going concern likelihood. While audit tenure shows a negative and significant impact on the going concern likelihood of DMBs in Nigeria. Based on the above findings, the study recommends that the authorities ensure that the board has the requisite financial expertise to oversee the financial reporting, risk management, and decision-making of the DMB. The regulatory authorities should also investigate cases of perceived failure of the board to perform its oversight function and take appropriate disciplinary actions against erring board members.



Keywords


board financial expertise; board independence; audit firm size; audit tenure; going concern

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Manurung, D. T., & Hardika, A. L. (2015). Analysis of factors that influence financial statement fraud in the perspective fraud diamond: Empirical study on banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange year 2012 to 2014. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42984276.pdf

2. International Accounting Standards Board. (2016). IFRS Practice Statement 2: Making Materiality Judgements. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/materiality-practice-statement/#about

3. Zhaokai, Y., & Moffitt, K. C. (2019). Contract Analytics in Auditing. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 111–126. doi: 10.2308/acch-52457

4. Law Chapple, L., Kent, P., & Routledge, J. (2012). Board Gender Diversity and Going Concern Audit Opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1979040

5. Todorovic, I., & Poljasevic, J. (2016). The impact of a going-concern audit opinion on board of directors. Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance and Risk Management, 3(1), 87-96.

6. Liao, J., Young, M. R., & Sun, Q. (2009). Independent Directors' Characteristics and Performance: Evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1489088

7. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. doi: 10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x

8. Chang, H., Cheng, C. S. A., & Reichelt, K. J. (2010). Market Reaction to Auditor Switching from Big 4 to Third-Tier Small Accounting Firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 83–114. doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.83


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 John Jandiya, Gbegi Daniel Orsa, Saidu Adamu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.