Restoration Mechanisms of Cancelled Authentic Deed
Abstract
This study aims to analyse the restoration mechanisms of an authentic deed that has been cancelled. The study involves a normative legal analysis that utilises secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The study adopts a methodology employing statute, conceptual, and case approaches.
As a result, the agreement is considered to have a formal defect and the act of creating the agreement is deemed unlawful. An authentic agreement can only be restored by annulling the court’s decision through an appeal and a cassation decision, followed by an extraordinary legal remedy called a review to cancel the cassation decision. It is important to note that the restoration of an authentic agreement can only occur within an ongoing trial, and there is no other way to recover a cancelled original agreement outside of this.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris [Cancellation and invalidation of notarial deeds]. Bandung: Refika Aditama (in Indonesian).
2. Kelsen, H. (2005). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Routledge.
3. Aristoteles. (1997). Teori Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Hukum [Theories of Justice in Legal Perspective]. Yakarta: Sinar Grafika (in Indonesian).
4. Kelsen, H. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Normatif [Foundations of Normative Law]. Bandung: Nusa Media (in Indonesian).
5. Salim, H. S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi [Application of legal theory to thesis and dissertation research]. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada (in Indonesian).
6. Purwoleksono, D. E. (2016). Hukum Acara Pidana [Criminal Procedure Law]. Yakarta: Airlangga University Press (in Indonesian).
7. Nuzul Indrawan, L., Arba, & Munandar, A. (2021). Juridicial Review Implementation Of Land Registration According To Government Regulation No. 18 Of 2021 Concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units And Land Registration. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 1(1), 39–56. doi: 10.55047/polri.v1i1.27
8. Salim, H. S. (2016). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah [Deed Making Techniques of Land Deed Officials]. Yakarta: Rajawali Pers (in Indonesian).
9. Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum [Legal research methods]. Yakarta: Sinar Grafika (in Indonesian).
10. Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum [Introduction to legal research methods]. Yakarta: Rajawali press (in Indonesian).
11. Muhaimin. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum [Legal Research Methods]. Mataram: Mataram Press (in Indonesian).
12. Rahmatullah, R. (2016). Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perkara [Authority of Religious Courts in Resolving Case Disputes]. Jurisprudentie, 3(1), 126–133 (in Indonesian).
13. Suparman, E. (2018). Hukum Waris Indonesia [Indonesian Inheritance Law]. Bandung: Refika Aditama (in Indonesian).
14. Prawira, Y. G. (2016). Tanggung Jawab PPAT terhadap Akta Jual Beli Tanah [Responsibility Of The Conveyancer Against Selling Land Deed]. Jurnal Ius, 4(1), 69–79 (in Indonesian).
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Robby Auzini Baidhowi, Hirsanuddin, Lalu Wira Pria Suhartana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Email the author