The Management of Dualism Leadership in Sekolah Nusa Alam a Cooperation Education Unit based School in Lombok, Indonesia

Budi Darmawan, Untung Waluyo, Sudirman Sudirman

Abstract

The aim of this research is limited to several factors that might cause “the tragedy of the commons” between a principal and a Kepala Sekolah. These factors are 1) cultural background, 2) differences in leadership models, and 3) differences in organizational behaviour. The research was conducted using a qualitative method with a single case study research design. The research was undertaken in one location, Sekolah Nusa Alam in Lombok. Data research techniques and procedures were unobstructed observation, semi-structured interviews, and data-checking processes. Interviews were conducted with six people using the purposive sampling method. The data analysis procedure was carried out by collecting the data, reducing the data, presenting the data, and concluding the data. The research showed that the cultural background, leadership model and organizational behaviour could trigger the ‘tragedy of the commons’ between the principal and Kepala Sekolah in Sekolah Nusa Alam. It is concluded that this happens because there is no or no misunderstanding in terms of communication, the application of leadership models and different organizational behaviours that lead to the misunderstanding in the collaboration between the two that trigger “the tragedy of the commons”.



Keywords


leadership; dualism; culture; organization; communication

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Nam, K. (2015). High Context and Low Context Communication. In J. Bennet (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence (pp. 377–381). N. d.: Sage Publication, Inc.

2. Broeder, P. (2021). Informed Communication in High Context and Low Context Cultures. Journal of Education, Innovation, and Communication, 3(1). doi: 10.34097/jeicom-3-1-june21-1

3. Rahul, M., & Ganesan, R. (2015). Leadership in Cross Cultural Environment – A Comparison of Asian and Non-Asian Managers. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(1), 211–266.

4. Fotini, G. (2022). The Leadership Models in Education. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7(2), 181–184.

5. Marzano, R. J., Walters T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School Leadership That Works, From Research to Results. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

6. Msila, V. (2012). Conflict Management and School Leadership. Journal of Communication, 3(1), 25–34. doi: 10.1080/0976691x.2012.11884792

7. Choudhury, S. R., Barman, A. (2014). Organisational Environment, Culture, and Subjective Well-being in Indian Power Sector Organisation: Case for Impact Contrast Analysis. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour and Management Perspective, 3(3), 1191–1199.

8. Luthans, F. (2011). Organisational Behaviour: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin Publisher.

9. Thomas, L., & Johnson, E. (2014). Contextual Teaching Learning. Jakarta: Kaifa.

10. Clistrap, R. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia [Human Resource Management]. Jakarta: Selemba Empat (in Indonesian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Budi Darmawan, Untung Waluyo, Sudirman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.