Juridical Study of Arrangements for Authentic Deeds through Cyber Notary: Comparative Study with Japan

Noval Dwi Kurnia, Muhammad Sood, Hirsanuddin Hirsanuddin

Abstract

This study aims to analyze cyber notary regulations in Indonesia and Japan, analyze the similarities and differences in cyber notary regulations in Indonesia and Japan and explore what benefits can be drawn from cyber notary regulations in Indonesia by using the theory of legal certainty, comparative law, legal system, and the idea of legal authority. The legal materials in this research are primary and secondary legal materials using normative research methods. According to the study, the concept of a cyber notary in Indonesia is still conceptual. At the same time, in Japan, the cyber notary is regulated in Law No 74 of 2011 concerning the Notary Act, which has differences related to Notary Organizations, procedures for carrying out cyber notary, Certification Authority / Certified Service Provider, and witnesses.




Keywords


Сyber notary; Authentic deed; Notaryact

Full Text:

PDF


References


1. Sihombing, L. B. (2020). Keabsahan Tanda Tangan Elektronik Dalam Akta Notaris [The validity of electronic signatures in notarial deeds]. Jurnal Education and development, 8(1), 134–140 (in Indonesian).

2. Makarim, E., & Kom, S. (2020). Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik Kajian Hukum Tentang CyberNotary atau Electronic Notary [Notaries and Electronic Transactions Legal Studies on CyberNotary or Electronic Notary]. Depok: Tahun (in Indonesian).

3. Arisatya, C. G., Sihabudin., & Safa’at, R. (2015). Urgensi Dan Relevansi Kewenangan Notaris Untuk Mensertifikasi Transaksi yang Dilakukan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Notaris Wilayah Kerja Kota Malang) [Urgency and Relevance of Notary Authority to Certify Transactions Conducted Electronically (Study in Notary Work Area of Malang City)]. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa. Retrieved from http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1235 (in Indonesian).

4. Nurita, E. (2012). Cyber Notary (Pemahaman Awal Dalam Konsep Pemikiran) [Cyber Notary (Initial Understanding in Conceptual Thinking)]. Bandung: Refika Aditama (in Indonesian).

5. Salim, H., & Nurbani, E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis [Application of Legal Theory to Thesis Research]. Retrieved from https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/penerapan-teori-hukum-pada-penelitian (in Indonesian).

6. Ibrahim, J. (2005). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif [Theory and Methods of Normative Legal Research]. Malang: Bayumedia (in Indonesian).

7. Makarim, E. (2015). Keautentikan Dokumen Publik Elektronik Dalam Administrasi Pemerintahan Dan Pelayanan Publik [Authenticity of Electronic Public Documents in Government Administration and Public Services]. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(4), 508. doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol45.no4.60 (in Indonesian).

8. Wijaya, P. A. P. D., & Prajitno, A. A. A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Kesalahan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris Penggantinya [Notary's Responsibility for Errors in Deed-Making Made by His Substitute Notary]. Perspektif, 23(2), 113. doi: 10.30742/perspektif.v23i2.684 (in Indonesian).

9. Gerungan, L. K. (2012). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Di Bawah Tangan Yang Telah Memperoleh Legalitas Dari Notaris [The Evidentiary Power of Underhand Deeds That Have Obtained Legality from Notaries]. Retrieved from http://repo.unsrat.ac.id/292/1/KEKUATAN_PEMBUKTIAN_AKTA_DI_BAWAH_TANGAN_YANG_TELAH_MEMPEROLEH_LEGALITAS_DARI_NOTARIS_LUSY_KFR_GE.pdf (in Indonesian).

10. Rizkianti, W. (2016). Akta Otentik Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Melalui Media Telekonferensi (Mekanisme Pembuatan dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya) [Authentic Deed of General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) Through Teleconference Media (Mechanism of Making and its Evidentiary Power)]. Jurnal Yuridis, 3(1), 83–98 (in Indonesian).

11. Wijanarko, F., Mulyoto., & Supanto. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Akta Notaris Terhadap Pemberlakuan CyberNotary Di Indonesia Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 [Juridical Review of Notarial Deed Against the Implementation of CyberNotary in Indonesia According to Law Number 2 Year 2014]. Repertorium, 2(2), 7–19 (in Indonesian).

12. Marzuki, P. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum [Introduction to the Science of Law]. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group (in Indonesian).

13. Madyastuti, R. (2020). Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Terjadinya Pelanggaran Kewenangan Dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris [The Authority of the Notary Supervisory Council in Preventing Violations of the Authority and Duties of Notary Office]. Renaissance, 3(5), 711–731 (in Indonesian).


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Noval Dwi Kurnia, Muhammad Sood, Hirsanuddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.