The Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Behaviour Towards, and Intention to Use Mobile Compilers in Learning Computer Programming
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Song, Y. (2014). “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.005
Nelson, D. (2012). BYOD: An opportunity schools cannot afford to miss. SmartBlogs on Education. Retrieved https://1library.net/document/qmjd1l84-an-opportunity-schools-cannot-afford-to-miss.html
Cardoza, Y., & Tunks, J. (2014). The Bring Your Own Technology Initiative: An Examination of Teachers’ Adoption. Computers in the Schools, 31(4), 293–315. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2014.967626
Soni, A. (2017, October 1). 6 advantages of BYOD in the classroom. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/byod-in-the-classroom-6-advantages
Joyce-Gibbons, A., Galloway, D., Mollel, A., Mgoma, S., Pima, M., & Deogratias, E. (2017). Mobile phone use in two secondary schools in Tanzania. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 73–92. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9586-1
McLean, K. J. (2016). The Implementation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Primary [Elementary] Schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01739
Mbise, K. S. (2021). The usefulness of mobile compilers for learning computer programming. The Journal of Informatics, 1(1), 43–57.
Oloo, G. J., & Robert, C. (2020). Exploring the use of an android based C/C++ compiler in learning of a programming course by university students. International Journal of Computer Applications, 175(22), 43–49.
Sharmila, F. M. (2017). Portable mobile java compiler. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 5(1), 357–360.
UNESCO. (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219641
Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 143–156.
Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.010
Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and Learning with iPads, Ready or Not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42–48. doi: 10.1007/s11528-011-0540-6
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Portz, J. D., Bayliss, E. A., Bull, S., Boxer, R. S., Bekelman, D. B., Gleason, K., & Czaja, S. (2019). Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e11604. doi: 10.2196/11604
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: 10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. doi: 10.1006/imms.1993.1022
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Evaluation of Security Factors Effectingon Web-Based Service Adoption, Recent Advances. In Telecommunications, Informatics and Educational Technology (pp. 117–123).
Olipas, C. N., & G. Cochanco, R. A. (2021). The information technology Students’ cognitive determinants and its relationship to academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 8(3), 381–389. doi: 10.22161/ijaers.83.39
Olipas, C. N. (2022). The Gen Z’s learning experiences and its relationship to social media use. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 8(1), 1291–1299.
Olipas, C. N. P., & Leona, R. F. (2020). The Extent Of Engagement To Social Networking Sites, The Impact of Playing Mobile Games, And The Students’ Learning Experiences: An Assessment. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(5), 112–119.
Pronto. (2022). Importance of student engagement in their learning journey. Retrieved from https://pronto.io/importance-student-engagement-learning-journey/
Tochukwu, I. U., & Hocarin, F. T. (2017). Awareness of Students on the Usefulness of ICT Tools in Education: Case of EMU. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(2), 96–106.
Cochanco, R. A., Olipas, C. N., Cochanco, A., & Sison, R. (2021). An Assessment on the Test Anxiety and Academic Performance of Information Technology Students. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 8(4), 118–122. doi: 10.22161/ijaers.84.13
Olipas, C., & Luciano, R. (2020). Understanding The Impact Of Using Countdown Timer On The Academic Motivation And Computer Programming Anxiety Of IT Students: The Case Of A State University In The Philippines. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 235–240.
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Cris Norman P. Olipas, Rodibelle F. Leona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.