US Intervention in Iraq

Rinor Rexhepi


The creation and functioning of world peace have always been the mission and goal of international relations, which is based on specific actions and strategies depending on the extent of the situation, but how many successes and results have been cannot always be predicted. The fight against transnational terrorism and the fight against general evil must always rightly be supported by all influential states in the world. The US intervention in Iraq is often seen with criticism and praise from various scholars and states. In our paper, we aimed to present the US intervention in Iraq based on the comparison and presentation of arguments from different studies and experts in the face of the question; was this intervention necessary or not, and was it humanitarian or aggression? We have tried to present the problem in the most scientific and argumentative way through descriptive, analytical and comparative methods, always based on scientific and factual approaches. In conclusion, we can say that based on general facts and arguments regarding the US intervention in Iraq, the goal has not been achieved correctly and that other forms could have been used to achieve the goal. The failure to find nuclear weapons inside Iraq and the failure to democratize it are two key arguments that shed light on hasty military action against Iraq.


War; Terrorism; Iraq; US; Intervention; Attacks

Full Text:



Bush, J. (2002, 8 October). President Bush’s Speech on the Use of Force. The New York Times. Retrieved

Claassen, C. A., Carmody, T., Stewart, S. M., Bossarte, R. M., Larkin, G. L., Woodward, W. A., & Trivedi, M. H. (2010). Effect of 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the USA on suicide in areas surrounding the crash sites. British Journal of Psychiatry, 196(5), 359–364. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.071928

Dalacoura, K. (2005). US democracy promotion in the Arab Middle East since 11 September 2001: a critique. International Affairs, 81(5), 963–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00497.x

Deutsche Welle. (2005, September 15). Lufta kundër terrorizmit zhvendoset në qendër të takimit të OKB. Retrieved from

Dodge, T. (2020). “The Failure of Peacebuilding in Iraq: The Role of Consociationalism and Political Settlements.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 459–475. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2020.1850036

Dunn, D. H. (2005). Bush, 11 September and the Conflicting Strategies of the “War on Terrorism.” Irish Studies in International Affairs, 16, 11–33.

Haji, B. (2019). Peace Building in Iraq Post 2003 (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from

Mekaj, G. (2020). Globalization and Rise of Terrorism. Path of Science, 6(9), 5001–5009. doi: 10.22178/pos.62-11

Mekaj, M. G., & Aliaj, M. K. (2018). Globalization as a facilitator of terrorism. ILIRIA International Review, 8(1). doi: 10.21113/iir.v8i1.400

Murphy, S. D. (2002). Terrorist Attacks on World Trade Center and Pentagon. American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 237–254. doi: 10.1017/s0002930000221593

Record, J. (2003). The Bush Doctrine and War with Iraq. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 33(1). doi: 10.55540/0031-1723.2135

Roth, K. (2006). Was the Iraq War a Humanitarian Intervention? Journal of Military Ethics, 5(2), 84–92. doi: 10.1080/15027570600711864

Taft, W. H., & Buchwald, T. F. (2003). Preemption, Iraq, and International Law. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 557–563. doi: 10.2307/3109840

Yoo, J. (2003). International Law and the War in Iraq. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 563–576. doi: 10.2307/3109841

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Rinor Rexhepi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.