US Intervention in Iraq
The creation and functioning of world peace have always been the mission and goal of international relations, which is based on specific actions and strategies depending on the extent of the situation, but how many successes and results have been cannot always be predicted. The fight against transnational terrorism and the fight against general evil must always rightly be supported by all influential states in the world. The US intervention in Iraq is often seen with criticism and praise from various scholars and states. In our paper, we aimed to present the US intervention in Iraq based on the comparison and presentation of arguments from different studies and experts in the face of the question; was this intervention necessary or not, and was it humanitarian or aggression? We have tried to present the problem in the most scientific and argumentative way through descriptive, analytical and comparative methods, always based on scientific and factual approaches. In conclusion, we can say that based on general facts and arguments regarding the US intervention in Iraq, the goal has not been achieved correctly and that other forms could have been used to achieve the goal. The failure to find nuclear weapons inside Iraq and the failure to democratize it are two key arguments that shed light on hasty military action against Iraq.
Bush, J. (2002, 8 October). President Bush’s Speech on the Use of Force. The New York Times. Retrieved https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/08/national/president-bushs-speech-on-the-use-of-force.html
Claassen, C. A., Carmody, T., Stewart, S. M., Bossarte, R. M., Larkin, G. L., Woodward, W. A., & Trivedi, M. H. (2010). Effect of 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the USA on suicide in areas surrounding the crash sites. British Journal of Psychiatry, 196(5), 359–364. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.071928
Dalacoura, K. (2005). US democracy promotion in the Arab Middle East since 11 September 2001: a critique. International Affairs, 81(5), 963–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00497.x
Deutsche Welle. (2005, September 15). Lufta kundër terrorizmit zhvendoset në qendër të takimit të OKB. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/sq/lufta-kund%C3%ABr-terrorizmit-zhvendoset-n%C3%AB-qend%C3%ABr-t%C3%AB-takimit-t%C3%AB-okb/a-2585942
Dodge, T. (2020). “The Failure of Peacebuilding in Iraq: The Role of Consociationalism and Political Settlements.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 459–475. doi: 10.1080/17502977.2020.1850036
Dunn, D. H. (2005). Bush, 11 September and the Conflicting Strategies of the “War on Terrorism.” Irish Studies in International Affairs, 16, 11–33.
Haji, B. (2019). Peace Building in Iraq Post 2003 (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344324546_PEACE_BUILDING_IN_IRAQ_POST_2003
Mekaj, G. (2020). Globalization and Rise of Terrorism. Path of Science, 6(9), 5001–5009. doi: 10.22178/pos.62-11
Mekaj, M. G., & Aliaj, M. K. (2018). Globalization as a facilitator of terrorism. ILIRIA International Review, 8(1). doi: 10.21113/iir.v8i1.400
Murphy, S. D. (2002). Terrorist Attacks on World Trade Center and Pentagon. American Journal of International Law, 96(1), 237–254. doi: 10.1017/s0002930000221593
Record, J. (2003). The Bush Doctrine and War with Iraq. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 33(1). doi: 10.55540/0031-1723.2135
Roth, K. (2006). Was the Iraq War a Humanitarian Intervention? Journal of Military Ethics, 5(2), 84–92. doi: 10.1080/15027570600711864
Taft, W. H., & Buchwald, T. F. (2003). Preemption, Iraq, and International Law. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 557–563. doi: 10.2307/3109840
Yoo, J. (2003). International Law and the War in Iraq. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 563–576. doi: 10.2307/3109841
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Rinor Rexhepi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.